Welcome to Stupidville.. . 101 We are supposed not to judge all Muslims by the acts of a few crazies... but the acts of a few American crazies is enough tn all
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - ninetwenty (04/12/2013) [+] (10 replies)
They aren't saying that all the Americans that owns a gun will go around and shoot people. It's a way of preventing more people from doing it. And the security has increased after acts of Muslims... So yeah, it goes both ways!
User avatar #7 - hudis (04/13/2013) [+] (16 replies)
From a "rest of the world"-viewpoint, this pointless drama over guns is getting ridiculous. Numerous other nations are fine (and have been for decades/centuries) without being obsessive about firearms, why do you have to make it such a big ******* deal?
#9 to #7 - teranin ONLINE (04/13/2013) [-]
At first I wrote a really long exposition about the many reasons why American citizens need to be able to own guns and all the many things our government has been doing the past 30 years to limit our citizen's rights, but I got way too long-winded and preachy and I doubt you would have bothered to read the whole thing, so I'm going to try to do this the short way.

Gun ownership is one of the fundamental aspects of American culture, because before the birth of the country britain attempted to take our guns, once they knew that we were becoming disinfranchised with their rule. We kept and hid our guns, and with them poorly-trained civilian militias managed to throw off the shackles of tyranny and forge this country based on the (although somewhat hypocritical at the time) ideas of freedom and liberty. We wrote into our original bill of rights the right to bear arms and form militias in order to always be able to overthrow our government should it become the very tyranny we had fought so hard to remove. Citizen gun ownership is therefore sacred in American culture, as it is the right we use to protect all of our other rights, so whenever the government decides it wants to limit or restrict the lynchpin right, it incites a defensive fervor in us which is ingrained into our very identity as Americans.

That's why it is, as you put it, "such a big ******* deal".

davidavidson will want to read this post.
#3 - Ken M (04/12/2013) [+] (2 replies)
That's not the point. If you want a gun to hunt, or to protect yourself, that is your legal right. However, if you need a high-capacity, 75x zoom scope, hollowpoint firing death machine to hunt? That's not necessary at all.
User avatar #8 to #3 - icedmantwo (04/13/2013) [-]
the only problem with that statement is most of that statement
>high capacity
please define more
>75x zoom scope
nobody would ever use anything even close to that retarded as that is approaching microscope level magnification
>hollow point firing
hollow points wont go through your walls and peg your neighbor accidently if you miss and are less effective than standard "ball" ammo for armored targets
>death machine
most of what you would consider "assault weapons" (an arbitrarily defined buzzword) or assault rifles are both semi automatic and fire smaller bullets than hunting rifles such as .223/5.56 vs .308, .30-06 or 7.62 variant ammo
#63 - Ken M (04/13/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Consider this:

You can ban guns in order to reduce gun related crime, that's the thinking behind it

How the **** do you ban people being Muslim without a major backlash you ******* retard?
User avatar #71 to #66 - angelious ONLINE (04/13/2013) [-]
well if your argument is "it wont stop criminals from doing it"

then why do we even bother with laws? criminals will break them anyway.lets just throw laws out of the window and live in a sweet sweet anarchy :I
#48 - bananarking **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (2 replies)
User avatar #56 to #48 - sparkyoneonetwo (04/13/2013) [-]
I wouldn't say it's that they change between then. It seems more like the different groups people come and go in waves around here. This could have been posted 10 hours latter and possible been thumbed to hell.
#27 - daboomee (04/13/2013) [+] (1 reply)
#16 - imgood (04/13/2013) [-]
Just cause ONE GUY killed a bunch of Jews, we can't put them in camps anymore...this world man...

inb4 red thumbs because I used logic in an arguement
#2 - Ken M (04/12/2013) [+] (2 replies)
yeah, only both attacks were performed by americans.
#77 - mikeclay (04/13/2013) [-]
America has been a hypocrite since before it was officially a country
User avatar #70 - epicextreme (04/13/2013) [-]
the explosion and his hair are the same
User avatar #65 - reaperriley ONLINE (04/13/2013) [-]
"We are supposed not to"

#35 - WolfPrince ONLINE (04/13/2013) [+] (10 replies)
If other countries citizens can live without guns, the USA can too.
I just don't understand why they love guns they're not allowed to shoot.
#25 - Ken M (04/13/2013) [+] (3 replies)
His hair is the same color as the explosion O_o
User avatar #23 - chuckbillrow (04/13/2013) [+] (2 replies)
gun control is not about saying if you own a gun you must be evil its more like if you want to own a gun we need to make sure you are not evil first also guns that have been deemed evil are off limits sorry for the inconvenience
#29 to #23 - tittylovin has deleted their comment [-]
#84 - Jesusnipples (04/13/2013) [-]
OP is a bad troll.

We're not attacking gun owners, because they're not all evil. We just want to regulate and keep a better track of guns, because they are a tool that can be used to thoroughly wreck someone's **** . It blows my mind that as soon as something completely preventable like Sandy Hook happens, all we hear from the NRA is "You can't take our guns!!"

Rant over

<-- unrelated
User avatar #80 - PubLandlord (04/13/2013) [+] (3 replies)
So America gets attacked once and then decides that's enough of a reason to invade Iraq on the basis of a terrorist threat , but after numerous shootings fails to see a problem with their gun culture.

Slight hypocrisy there
User avatar #47 - MegaAwesomeSauce (04/13/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Can't people just deal with the fact that guns shouldn't be accessible to everyone?
#40 - Ken M (04/13/2013) [+] (2 replies)

That guy is Kim De Gelder, he's Belgian, not american. He murdered several kids and a few adults. With a knive, not a gun. He's locked away now though.
#36 - thisotherdude (04/13/2013) [-]
What was that, sorry, couldn't hear you over the sound of our long since dropped long gun registry and my legally unregistered SKS.

I swear, the way we're going in 10 years the US is gonna have some of the strictest gun control and over here we'll be like "gun control? Oh you mean that thing we used to have"
#32 - Ken M (04/13/2013) [-]
DBZ has a better story, better characters, and character development than your average teranin.
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)