EA making a very true statement.. Here's where I found it . Electronic Arts 45 minutes ago i' Sup consumerism, find your wallet because BFA is on the way! Featu EA making a very true statement Here's where I found it Electronic Arts 45 minutes ago i' Sup consumerism find your wallet because BFA is on the way! Featu
Upload
Login or register

EA making a very true statement.

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
Electronic Arts
45 minutes ago i'
Sup consumerism, find your wallet because BFA is on the way!
Featuring a new shitty campaign, a ton of shitty DLC because we
dont know new to make a fully constructed game and a voice
system so you can hear who fucked your mom,
Like ' Comment ' Share Cei) 1
Nathan Dixon, kevin Wish, Fernando Ruiz and 3 others like this,
Electronic Arts We' re working as hard as we can! Our employees
A are doing a very good job at jacking each other off,
35 minutes ago ' Edited ' Like '
Write a comment...
...
+1098
Views: 47976 Submitted: 04/10/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (182)
[ 182 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#3 - lempersy
Reply +240 123456789123345869
(04/10/2013) [-]
EA's response to being named worst Company in America
EA's response to being named worst Company in America
#168 to #3 - monkeybrains
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I like it.
User avatar #81 to #3 - RiflemanFunny
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Again
#15 - aconfuseddonut
Reply +18 123456789123345869
(04/10/2013) [-]
#129 to #15 - donbonbon
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
funny enough...
User avatar #144 to #15 - germed
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
EA: Electronic Anti-Christs
User avatar #24 to #15 - bloodspider
Reply +114 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Don't sully Satan's good name with that of EA.
#29 to #24 - sirbutterballs
-3 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#104 to #29 - psychodreadnought
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#27 - sniffythebird
Reply +34 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
>Take BF3
>Add more lens flare and dubstep
>Continue some 4 hour long campaign no one gives a **** about
>Recycle multiplayer
>Super awesome pre-order premium exclusive bonus - get a few extra weapons when you pay more, or maybe get an extra skin for a gun!
>BF4
User avatar #31 to #27 - mythicdragoon
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
and this is different from CoD...how?
#33 to #31 - sniffythebird
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
>Most modern FPS games these days
User avatar #34 to #33 - mythicdragoon
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
didn't answer the question
User avatar #35 to #34 - sniffythebird
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I don't get how people said MW3 was the same as MW2. I played the effing **** out of 2, and found 3 to be so different and stupid I just couldn't play it much at all.

Same for BO 1 and 2. Yeah, they're on the same engine and ****, but the feel of the gameplay changes a lot. That isn't the case with Battlefield. Apart from being able to sprint diagonally and having some smoother animations, BF3 was just like BFBC2. BF4 looks like just another DLC for BF3, except that it adds some more sun glare / lens flare and a more modern look to the whole shebang.
User avatar #64 to #35 - coolcalx
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
what didn't you like about MW3, as opposed to MW2?
I actually preferred 3 to 2
User avatar #169 to #64 - sniffythebird
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
What rohze said + how the perks, classes, guns + attachments work. I just felt MW3 was more unbalanced than MW2, every kind of class setup just felt weird. Yeah, MW2 had one many army noobtubes and commando, but then the worst gametype was to play ground war, which is not what you should do in MW2. Free for all in MW2 was near flawless except for boosters (which I actually kinda liked, because it was fun hunting them down), or people getting lucky with killstreaks.
User avatar #177 to #169 - coolcalx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
how was 3 more unbalanced than 2?

2 was awful because of all the noobtubes (which you mentioned) and mostly the UMP being way overpowered, which they fixed in 3.

also, I love how I'm getting thumbed down for asking a question, and then making an obviously subjective statement.
User avatar #121 to #64 - rohze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
For me as a PC gamer it was the hit reg, mouse acceleration, and the horrible ******* graphics. I don't mean to be a graphics whore but it was probably the ugliest game I have ever played and coupled with the terrible reg, it was just bad. At least in my opinion.
User avatar #178 to #121 - coolcalx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I have it for the PS3, so none of that is applicable to me.
the graphics (on the PS3) are much better on 3 than on 2, and the hit registration worked fine on the PSN servers.

this is probably why I liked it and you didn't.

I've never played the PC version, but can you not change the mouse acceleration? I've been able to do that on literally every PC game I've ever played.
User avatar #186 to #178 - rohze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
No it was a very bad console port and didn't even have dedicated servers. The reason for the bad hit reg is that as a PC gamer we're used to server side hit reg inside of client side/host. There were a few 3rd party mouse accel fixes I believe but they didn't work 100% of the time.
User avatar #189 to #186 - coolcalx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
does BF3 have the same server problem?
User avatar #193 to #189 - rohze
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
No, but BF3 does have an issue with its server-side + client-side hybrid netcode. It really doesn't work well at all but almost all of the Battlefield games since 1942 were notorious for having atrocious hit reg problems and over-all general network issues. BF3 does technically have dedicated servers but mod tools were never released (which is a huge no no to do with PC shooters) and you could only get "EA" ones which are servers that EA has approved of, which is okay but doesn't allow for a large selection of providers.
#194 to #193 - coolcalx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
"all of the Battlefield games since 1942"

you have no idea how confused I was when I read this. I was trying to figure out how video games existed in 1942.

mfw
User avatar #195 to #194 - rohze
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/13/2013) [-]
Lol should have elaborated on that a bit better I apologize.
User avatar #135 to #31 - ninjastarthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
It's not.
User avatar #77 to #31 - ronyx
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
As a matter of fact it's not different from CoD. EA saw that they could turn BF series into a cowmilk like the CoD franchise. After BF:BC2 they realize they could just **** out a spray and pray fps game that could appeal to most CoD players. That is why BF3 became CoD with better graphics and that's why BF4 will be BF3 with new maps, vehicles and guns, basically a 60 dollar DLC.
User avatar #41 to #27 - darkfuzion
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Yes, pretty much. I had swear a screw in my table went loose when the theme for BF4 played when I saw the trailer.
#89 to #27 - anon id: 98dee1e5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
No way man, we get 5 NEW CAMOS (one per 5 randomly selected guns out of 50, so of the 10% chance the gun you wanted gets selected, there's an 80% chance it will be a camo you didn't want, assuming you wanted any of them, considering they're all **** anyway).

$120 well spent, take that Arma III.
#114 to #27 - anon id: a408274e
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
To be fair, it runs on Frostbite III, whereas BF3 runs on Frostbite II.
User avatar #122 to #114 - rohze
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I'm not even joking when I say that BF4 looked exactly the same as BF3. Especially the knife takedowns and Russian models being directly ripped from BF3.
#53 - Crazywarriorman
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I believe DICE writes the storyline and develops the game, not EA. I also believe that if you judge a game soley on it's owner without even playing it, then you need to get out.

"It looks the same as battlefield 3 with different guns and graphics"
Battlefield 3 was pretty bad ass, and DICE didn't need to change much to make it better. Just a few tweaks here and there. I for one am looking forward to the new game.
User avatar #78 to #53 - TheSock
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Thank You! I personally really like EA, dead space and battlefield are 2 of my favorite series, and it makes me mad when people see EA and wont even try the game, or instantly **** on it. I just dont see the point in getting all mad at a company, just my opinion anyway..and as long as DICE is making it, any battlefield game will be kickass
User avatar #93 to #53 - ninjastarthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
DICE has the curse of EA's ****** business.
User avatar #107 to #53 - stringfingerable
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I think the story with this one is going to take the cake. I really liked the trailer.
#139 to #53 - anon id: d855a5f7
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
It is the publishers that make the deadline, thus the development cycle, and fund the entire project. They can force the developers' hand in many cases, because the developers have no other alternative. EA just tries to get a slice of the cake by publishing games that come out several times through sequels; the Battlefield franchise, Mass Effect 1, 2 and 3, Dragon Age: Origins, II and III, FIFA and so forth. Of course it is the publishers' intent to earn money, but EA doesn't care and is indifferent to the game studios that they destroy along the way by downgrading their products through short development cycles, forced (day-1) DLC and desperate profit-making.
#141 to #53 - anon id: b3b52812
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
yes
User avatar #161 to #53 - Cloudlessewe
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
BF 3's multiplayer was amazing. The SP campaign on the other hand... not so much. If BF4 is released with a more gripping campaign, and a multiplayer with the same style but with TONS of new features, i think it could turn out to be a pretty good game.
User avatar #73 to #53 - ronyx
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Not sure what you mean about the "storyline" DICE sucks ass writing a good SP campaign, leave that to Bioware. FYI publishers have a huge impact on what goes into the game and what doesn't since they're the ones injecting money into the game. Thus a lot of things get changed and a lot of features get dropped as to maximize profits, this is coming from an interview from a publisher.
User avatar #23 - therealtjthemedic
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
ElectronIc Arts > Electronic arts
#52 - sonofposeidon
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Come on guys...Quidditch: World Cup was awesome.
Come on guys...Quidditch: World Cup was awesome.
User avatar #7 - hjgamer
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(04/10/2013) [-]
#25 to #7 - haloavp
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #99 - ninjastarthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
EA doesn't give a **** about the consumer. All they care about is money...
User avatar #142 to #99 - thalfak
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Find a company that doesn't?
User avatar #187 to #142 - deadinferno
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
Bungie
User avatar #188 to #187 - thalfak
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(04/12/2013) [-]
We'll see with their new game for PS4 :)
User avatar #172 to #142 - ninjastarthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Good point.
#115 to #99 - blakkmagicman
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
thanks for the update bud
thanks for the update bud
#79 - xblueflamex
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I actually really like BF3, I still play it and I also bought premium and never once regretted it. BF4 looks bad ass and I mean if you go to gamestop and put at least 5 dollars down on a BF4 preorder, you also get BF4 premium edition.
#106 to #79 - anon id: acde3a27
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
cool opinion bro
User avatar #132 to #79 - ninjastarthrow
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
I regretted premium. I could have just bought Armored Kill and Back to Karkand and been happy.
#152 to #79 - anon id: ca2ab9dd
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
But there's no point in getting bf4, and that's the thing that's really supposed to bother you.

They're trying to pull a call of duty, without actually including a good single player campaign or anything new in general.
#68 - ROTFLcopter **User deleted account**
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(04/11/2013) [-]
Boron Tetrafluoride?