0. ­.. As much as I hate to be "that murican", North Korea actually is at a state of war and has threatened to attack other countries as soon as it has nucle
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

0

­

+1054
Views: 45932
Favorited: 73
Submitted: 04/05/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to rototornjik E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(321):

[ 321 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #1 - gatodelfuego (04/05/2013) [+] (21 replies)
As much as I hate to be "that murican", North Korea actually is at a state of war and has threatened to attack other countries as soon as it has nuclear capabilities, unlike every other nuclear country. Don't act like the USA is the only nuclear-enabled country against the poor, small, north korea.
#27 - defectivetoast (04/05/2013) [+] (9 replies)
I don't want to sound like an 'Murican, but the US doesn't threaten to use their nukes every other week just because of some misunderstanding.
#79 - psykobear (04/06/2013) [+] (34 replies)
To be fair, North Korea threatened to use their missile.
The USA's missiles are there for added security. The USA has not threatened to use them on anyone unprovoked.
Before you red thumb me, think about it.
#50 - anonymous (04/06/2013) [+] (6 replies)
so now people are sympathetic to the N. Korean government? Well, my faith in humanity was just shot to hell
#56 - jrondeau **User deleted account** (04/06/2013) [+] (6 replies)
Just get out of here OP. No sane person is sympathetic to North Korea.
Just get out of here OP. No sane person is sympathetic to North Korea.
#48 - telamatoes (04/06/2013) [+] (8 replies)
We know when to use them, which is never.
User avatar #84 - buttholee (04/06/2013) [+] (4 replies)
North Korea is threatening countries with their bombs... USA just have them stock piled, that's it
#8 - ClicheUsername (04/05/2013) [+] (11 replies)
The difference is the US did not declare that they are in a state of war and are going against UN sanctions and firing nuclear weapons at other countries.
+30
#139 - zmbz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (7 replies)
#181 - anaphase (04/06/2013) [+] (5 replies)
#240 - skwirl (04/06/2013) [+] (14 replies)
But the US isn't claiming they'll nuke everyone and anyone.
User avatar #189 - Awesomecarrot (04/06/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Although this is very true, to be fair, the USA
aren't threatening to blow anyone up with theirs.
User avatar #191 to #189 - VincentKing ONLINE (04/06/2013) [-]
well, not publicly at least.
User avatar #23 - gernab (04/05/2013) [+] (7 replies)
I have shortened it down to this, having a big stick doesn't mean shit unless you swing it.
#121 - bakinboy ONLINE (04/06/2013) [+] (1 reply)
this cartoon is biased in the most retarded way possible
this cartoon is biased in the most retarded way possible
User avatar #32 - I Am Monkey (04/05/2013) [-]
That's like saying "Hey, you have guns. That means you're a hypocrite if you don't let this lunatic run around with them and point them in your face"

There are plenty of countries that the US has helped get nukes and dozens more that have them with no quarrel from the US. It's when a tinpot dictatorship gets a hold of them and runs propaganda ads of nuking the US capitol that we draw the line. The number of nukes we have is irrelevant. It only takes one to cause unimaginable destruction. The only reason we have to many is for the sake of Mutually Assured Destruction. So that if Russia or China ever tried to nuke us, they would also be destroyed by the counterattack thus keeping each side from starting an exchange. MAD doesn't apply to places like North Korea that do not care for their own wellbeing. They have proven this when they dump their budget into nukes while their people starve by the millions.
#166 - themexicanpwner (04/06/2013) [+] (6 replies)
as someone who is English, so is in no way biased or american, can i just say this post is bollocks. the north Koreans and that fat fuck leader threatened the south and other smaller, poorer country, and then had the audacity to say "herro merica, we hav permission to nuke you tooooo" and what?, America is not going to defend itself? or step in and say that what they are doing is wrong? that's bullshit. i completely agree with america on this one.
tl;Dr: op is a faggot and this post is bullshit
pic not related
User avatar #301 - maskedhippo (04/06/2013) [-]
Except America doesn't threaten other countries with nukes,
#136 - SilentRaver (04/06/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Kim Jong-il only died like a year ago. How the fuck are you all so dense to not be able to recognize him?
This cartoon was published in 2006, after North Korea announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test. We were angry because they produced the weapons in secret, violating our agreements. Kim's regime argued the secret production was necessary for security purposes — citing the presence of United States-owned nuclear weapons in South Korea and the new tensions with the United States under President George W. Bush.

tl;dr - They were not openly making threats to the world at this time.
Because KJU wasn't yet in power on a mission to compensate for being the living incarnation of the word 'chode'.
Therefore, this cartoon is not stupid.
The OP is stupid for not understanding it's complete irrelevance to current events.
[ 321 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)