Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#207 - beerterror (03/23/2013) [-]
MFW Internet liberals.   
   
1. Church shouldn't change it's course or it's dogmas at "how people feel these days about something". Religion, if we care to organise one, should be as a monolith, to which people will gather seeking stability. Of course they should also be morally superior, so they shouldn't be raping 						*******					 altar boys, but why don't we have both?   
   
2. Nobody cares who are you 						*******					, and nobody has the right do tell you who you should be 						*******					. But gay adoption is over the top for me, mother and father are iconic figures in child's development, and it shouldn't be changed in any way. And don't give "same sex couples are better parents" cause one thing probably is - they're more liberal, which leads to child's lack of authorities and proper up-bringing, the other - abusive families probably make the same percentage of same sex couples and classic families.
MFW Internet liberals.

1. Church shouldn't change it's course or it's dogmas at "how people feel these days about something". Religion, if we care to organise one, should be as a monolith, to which people will gather seeking stability. Of course they should also be morally superior, so they shouldn't be raping ******* altar boys, but why don't we have both?

2. Nobody cares who are you ******* , and nobody has the right do tell you who you should be ******* . But gay adoption is over the top for me, mother and father are iconic figures in child's development, and it shouldn't be changed in any way. And don't give "same sex couples are better parents" cause one thing probably is - they're more liberal, which leads to child's lack of authorities and proper up-bringing, the other - abusive families probably make the same percentage of same sex couples and classic families.
#254 to #207 - freddyhollensen (03/23/2013) [-]
MFW reading your comment.

On one hand, I'm thinking you're just a troll... But it's probably just because I haven't had my dose of internet crazy for a while, which makes it hard for me to believe you really are this screwed up. Nevertheless, I'm going to give you the disfavour of taking you serious.

1. Incredibly enough I can somehow agree with the first part of your argument, I'm an atheist so it's not like I agree with your doctrine, but for an institution who makes its numbers from claiming to know eternal and divine truth... You'd think they'd be more consistent. (Populism seem dishonest at best in this case)

2. You literally just contradicted yourself immediately after making your first statement... Twice. ''Nobody cares who you are ******* , and nobody has the right to tell you who you should be ********* the next line you say that you personally feel that a child will have a bad upbringing if its parents have same sex relations, whereafter you go on to talk about how people must be straight to adopt children.

Are you even reading what you're writing or are you just splattering ******** on our screens to hide the smell of your own ****** opinions.

Either you're a clever troll or you're a stupid cunt.
#239 to #207 - batassassin (03/23/2013) [-]
maybe you ought to just go home.
maybe you ought to just go home.
#229 to #207 - anonymoose (03/23/2013) [-]
The church has already changed dramatically and will change dramatically based on "how people feel these days about something". If it didn't the religion would simply die out. It has to evolve to survive.   
   
gay couples naturally adopt a masculine and feminine role each.   
   
Should single parents have their children taken away from them?   
   
You can ignore statistics all you want, but children of gay couples show absolutely no lack of development.
The church has already changed dramatically and will change dramatically based on "how people feel these days about something". If it didn't the religion would simply die out. It has to evolve to survive.

gay couples naturally adopt a masculine and feminine role each.

Should single parents have their children taken away from them?

You can ignore statistics all you want, but children of gay couples show absolutely no lack of development.
User avatar #223 to #207 - neoexdeath ONLINE (03/23/2013) [-]
Goddammit Hitler, this is why we can't have nice things!

That stash would look ******* AWESOME on me, and I can't use it!
#217 to #207 - toughactintinactin (03/23/2013) [-]
Is it fun being a self righteous bigot?
Is it fun being a self righteous bigot?
User avatar #211 to #207 - internetrage (03/23/2013) [-]
also unfortunately kids with same sex parents get the absolute **** ripped out of them at school etc. i know this cause someone i knew had two mums and he had to leave school. incidentally, he's gay now.
User avatar #231 to #211 - anonymoose (03/23/2013) [-]
That's because people make gay adoption out to be something strange. If it were normalised, it would probably start becoming just as normal as having adopted heterosexual parents.
User avatar #259 to #231 - goldenglimmer (03/23/2013) [-]
This is the problem with "normalization". The thing about homosexuality is this - it's not normal, and it never will be. That doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong, it just means that in a biological, natural and psychological sense, it isn't normal. We have to accept this and stop sticking our fingers in our ears yelling "equal rights, tolerance, social justice!".

Our society is obsessed with "normalizing this" and "normalizing that". What we've done is make gays a minority, and assign them rights based upon the notions of social justice, which seems to be a trend lately. This is part of an odious illusion - that rights are something that can be given to us; provided to us by a benevolent state. I humbly believe that rights are something innate, self-evident and consistent, not something to be changed on a whim because our culture has been seduced by the idea of tolerance (which apparently is more important than tolerance itself).

The moral decadence and social rationalization so prevalent in our society, indicates we are at a crossroads in civilization. It has been seen before in history; we haven't discovered anything new. Every time a culture has become focused with rights instead of responsibility, it has buckled. What we're doing, when we boil it down, is simply justifying our own feel-good mentalities. It's easier to be a relativist, and it feels good to pretend that "everything is the same and nothing is absolute truth", but this is a counter-productive and ultimately destructive philosophy, which is shown time and time again in history.

On the matter of gay adoption, I am personally against it (for now), and I have a few gay friends who are as well. Why? Because there are negative implications of having same sex parents revealed in recent studies. This is simply the objective truth. If one has an agenda when considering this, that is truly disgusting. After all, this is about the welfare of our children, not about self-righteous demands for "rights".
User avatar #210 to #207 - dedaluminus (03/23/2013) [-]
I did math just to thumb you down. I hope you're happy with yourself.
#214 to #210 - beerterror (03/23/2013) [-]
I expressed my opinion, if you don't have contrarguments I don't really care.
 Friends (0)