Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #2 - vatra (03/15/2013) [-]
But, she looks fine in the first picture..
0
#147 to #2 - lvlarcopolio **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #151 to #147 - vatra (03/16/2013) [-]
In comment number 14 I freely admitted she looks better in the second picture, but she isn't bad in the first. Lower your excessively high standards.
0
#155 to #151 - lvlarcopolio **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #159 to #155 - vatra (03/16/2013) [-]
She honestly doesn't look bad to me. Also I can't help but laugh at that last part considering how many chicks I've insulted royally on other threads.
0
#162 to #159 - lvlarcopolio **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #164 to #162 - vatra (03/16/2013) [-]
Dude, it is the hair style that is atrocious, if she let her hair down in the first picture she'd look like a slightly younger version of the second picture.
User avatar #11 to #2 - Onemanretardpack (03/15/2013) [-]
>White knighting this hard
She looks OK in the first picture, way better in the second
User avatar #14 to #11 - vatra (03/15/2013) [-]
Never claimed she looked great, just fine, she just isn't bad looking, and I do agree she does look better in the second.
#13 to #11 - waffies (03/15/2013) [-]
White knighting isn't the act of defending a girls appearance in a random, it's the act of trying to be moral, fair, and kind, even in a moral vacuum. If she herself had posted an image and people had insulted, i feel it's a different story, but it's just an opinion of someones appearance.
 Friends (0)