| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#61 - cupotruth (03/09/2013) [-]
If 4chan had been on it Bin Laden would have been dead years ago.
If 4chan had been on it Bin Laden would have been dead years ago.
#465 to #61 - koobzacc (03/10/2013) [-]
Anonymous, not 4chan :P
#462 to #61 - adamks ONLINE (03/10/2013) [-]
But that is not true. You can be one hundred percent sure that whoever found him, is better at finding people than 4chan.
#472 to #462 - cabbagemayhem (03/11/2013) [-]
What makes you think that whoever found him isn't from 4chan?
#473 to #472 - adamks ONLINE (03/11/2013) [-]
My certainty that 4chan is just as unproductive and dumb as we are.
#475 to #473 - cabbagemayhem (03/11/2013) [-]
The only site as unproductive as we are is 9fag. 4chan has a verifiable history of being in a completely different bracket of productivity than fj. By the time you looked though, it was probably already crawling with fj and 9fag cancer. What you saw was probably just a mirror of your own shitty sites.
#476 to #475 - adamks ONLINE (03/11/2013) [-]
Stop licking 4chan's ass. I don't consider myself a legitimate part of 4chan, but I do lurk on their every once in a while, as in a couple times a week maybe. We are all the same people.
#479 to #476 - cabbagemayhem (03/11/2013) [-]
Also, stop going to 4chan. It's bad for you, and you're probably just being cancer.
#478 to #476 - cabbagemayhem (03/11/2013) [-]
4chan invented lolcats, trolled national media, and were the original anonymous. They pioneered most of what you see today when you were learning to type. FJ invented the repost. Ever since FB introduced swaths of douchebags to the internet, there's been cancer everywhere, but before that, we weren't even close to the same people. /b/ is shit, but you can't say they're as unproductive as we are. So I ask you again, what makes you think whoever found him isn't from 4chan?
#480 to #478 - adamks ONLINE (03/11/2013) [-]
That they are just as fucking stupid as us. They are just more.
#484 to #480 - cabbagemayhem (03/11/2013) [-]
4chan has produced far more intelligent content than this site ever has, and that's why we leech their content. We're not smarter, we just have more of a life. Some people confuse the two. pic related
#485 to #484 - adamks ONLINE (03/11/2013) [-]
You're not possible to argue with. Few people on 4chan has done something cool, like Katawa Shujo, but the majority is just like us. Lazy people looking for a cheap laugh.
#487 to #485 - cabbagemayhem (03/11/2013) [-]
Katawa Shujo is the coolest thing you've seen come out of 4chan? Well, maybe that's the problem. Anyway, as you can now see, there's no reason the person who caught Osama isn't one of those "few" at the head of the class, and there's no way to know.
#477 to #476 - adamks ONLINE (03/11/2013) [-]
Wow. Can't believe I did that. On there*
0
#474 to #473 - cabbagemayhem has deleted their comment. [-]
#405 to #61 - ignusblanchh (03/10/2013) [-]
you give anonanus and 4chub to much credit lol   
also 4chan isnt what it ysed to be   
   
   
lelele we is leeeee juuun
you give anonanus and 4chub to much credit lol
also 4chan isnt what it ysed to be


lelele we is leeeee juuun
User avatar #454 to #405 - AlexPaincakes ONLINE (03/10/2013) [-]
Because too many people know about it swarming it with newfags.
User avatar #122 to #61 - admiralen ONLINE (03/09/2013) [-]
playstation network down for a week bin ladin found, coincidense?
#111 to #61 - undeadwill (03/09/2013) [-]
I think you're right
#65 to #61 - N. Korean citizen (03/09/2013) [-]
im pretty sure bin laden doesn't have a facebook page and a phone number.. U FUKING RETARD
User avatar #86 to #65 - goteamphaze (03/09/2013) [-]
he HAD a twitter page and a skype number
#84 to #65 - cabbagemayhem (03/09/2013) [-]
Implying that's the only way to do it.
User avatar #97 to #84 - thrashish (03/09/2013) [-]
implying you support the premise that a gang of nerds can kill the head of a jihadist organization.

pew pew binladen...imma chargin up mah lazors!!
User avatar #151 to #97 - sirbutterballs (03/09/2013) [-]
Maybe if they hacked a military drone?
User avatar #181 to #151 - thrashish (03/09/2013) [-]
only in the movies. military (national defense) (covert) operations require an extraordinary amount of time, money, equipment, and extremely skilled people power. '4chan' simply does not have the resources. tracking down kids on the internet is one thing. tracking down a guy surrounded by well armed zealots who lives in caves and without electricity is entirely different. actually delivering a kill vehicle to that guy adds an entirely new set of problems. while my opinion is seemingly an unpopular one, i stand by it...no way.
User avatar #187 to #181 - sirbutterballs (03/09/2013) [-]
Obviously, just said it jokingly
User avatar #189 to #187 - thrashish (03/09/2013) [-]
oi. forgive me plz. a thumb for you, kind sir.
User avatar #192 to #189 - sirbutterballs (03/09/2013) [-]
S'alright. Kinda hard to know someones tone from text
#102 to #97 - cabbagemayhem (03/09/2013) [-]
1. No, I did not imply that.
2. If you knew what you were talking about, you would know why it is possible that they could.
3. The CIA, a band of nerds, already did track him down and kill him. Your argument is invalid.
User avatar #103 to #102 - thrashish (03/09/2013) [-]
meh. im not about to argue with you.

implying you have any fucking clue what kind of operation the whole 'track and kill' binladen thing was. did you watch zero dark thirty or something? is your uncle on seal team six?
#107 to #103 - cabbagemayhem (03/09/2013) [-]
meh. im not about to argue with you.

implying you have any fucking clue what kind of operation the whole 'track and ruin lives' thing is. did you watch some screen caps? is your uncle a child molester?
User avatar #112 to #107 - thrashish (03/09/2013) [-]
heh. actually..my uncle is a child molester. i would ask how you knew, but whats the point in bringing that all back up?
 Friends (0)