win. . Those gentle, always polite Canadians. Maybe beige hockey commentator makess difference. DON CHERRY, Canadian Hockey CBC Television, was asked on a local
Home Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

win

Those gentle, always polite Canadians.
Maybe beige hockey commentator makess difference.
DON CHERRY, Canadian Hockey CBC Television, was asked on a local live radio talk
show, what he thought about the allegations of suspected terrorists. His reply prompted
his ejection from the studio, but to thunderous applause from the audience.
HIS STATER ENT:
If hooking up one rag head terrorist prisoner' s a car battery's getthe truth out ofthe
lying little camel one Canadian life or American, then I have onlything things to
say:
Red is positive, black is negative, and make sure his nuts are wet."
...
+713
Views: 41300
Favorited: 123
Submitted: 03/05/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to bcsaint E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(129):

[ 129 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
#141 - mypielovingfriend (03/11/2013) [-]
you cant torture a terrorists because its not even human
you cant torture a terrorists because its not even human
User avatar #108 - bcsaint (03/06/2013) [-]
top 12 XD
#102 - timmywankenobi (03/06/2013) [-]
"Those who would give up Essential Liberties to purchase a little Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."-Ben Franklin
#120 to #102 - winglit (03/07/2013) [-]
giving up guns to try and make people safer... BAM argument turn around!
User avatar #121 to #120 - timmywankenobi (03/07/2013) [-]
when did I say anything about taking guns away ?
#122 to #121 - winglit (03/07/2013) [-]
im making the relatively safe assumption that your a liberal and in favor of stricter gun control by examining your above comment's complete misuse of his quote for torture being seen as a giving up freedom for temporary safety... if this isnt what you meant then please clarify better next time you use a quote completely out of context with no knowladge of how it was originally used, ALSO "give a man a quote and he sure as hell wont stop trying to act cool on the internet" ~ Abraham Lincon
see i can do it too
User avatar #124 to #122 - timmywankenobi (03/07/2013) [-]
I was referring to not giving terrorists or suspected terrorists any Rights, and the government passing the patriot act etc. taking away freedoms and right to make Americans feel safe. no I am not for taking guns away I am for preforming background checks and psychiatric evaluations for anyone who want's assault weapons or multiple weapons and more training to handle fire arms responsibly. Also Lincon never said that where as my quote was Franklin.
#125 to #124 - winglit (03/07/2013) [-]
Wow you really didn't get the point of my fake Abe quote... you need to understand something, quoting someone smart doesn't make you smart, Ben Franklin never had this exact situation and that quote wasn't for or against torture, your taking the words of a dead man (albeit a great man) and using them to fight an argument he was never involved in... ALSO a great man isn't the one that uses quotes from the past, its the man who makes those quotes in the first place... you quoting a dead man doesn't justify or mean anything, do you really think you can use his words to describe the current situation? he didn't know the extent technology would reach, we don't know how he would react in a world with all that we have, for all we know he couldve ended up a fat welfare abusing trailer trash illiterate... You need to find your own words to express your opinion and stop stealing from corpses, why should i need to have a psychiatric evaluation to carry a gun? why do i need a background check, its a gun, i could kill someone with a knife, **** my Ex would consistently brag about knowing how to kill someone with her bare hands by holding an artery, I'm sure you could find a way to kill someone with a marshmallow... Don't claim to defend freedom on one thing and go back on it if someone doesn't gel with your sense of sanity... I don't disagree with your dislike of the patriot act, I'm a Libertarian i hate all things which drag America's "freedom" through the mud, but people who rob the dead of their words to justify any argument don't deserve to weigh in on it, hold your tongue unless it speaks your own words. ~Winglit of Funnyjunk
User avatar #126 to #125 - timmywankenobi (03/07/2013) [-]
the quote was about the government taking away rights and freedoms for the illusion of safety. this Ideal is applicable in any era regardless of technological advancements. anyone who thinks they need multiple assault weapons should have a basic psychiatric evaluation .I didn't rob his words I shared his Ideals.
#127 to #126 - winglit (03/08/2013) [-]
Again no you didn't share his ideals, you don't know his ideals, you don't know how he would react in this situation at all, and using a random quote from a man in history DOESN'T make you right or intelligent, now either express your opinion without quotes from a man who didn't weigh in on the argument in the first place, OR shut up... either or, I'm not picky, but if you intend to use quotes to prove yourself right, then you probably aren't qualified to properly care for yourself, let alone decide the rights and liberties of a nation... so are you smarter than your typical Wikipedia page? because Wiki on Ben Franklin has that quote too... and WIki doesn't even preach their own ideals using his quote, so actually you don't even seem as smart as one of the least reputable websites for information on the internet... the one edited by a whole hell of a lot of idiots... you really don't look smart quoting the dead... get it?
User avatar #128 to #127 - timmywankenobi (03/08/2013) [-]
I know some of his ideals cause he wrote them down and he made comments to similar situations, and I can't be 100% sure how he would act in this situation, but judging by his actions in his life time it is safe to say he would agree with me as would many others that America has become a shadow of what is was and strayed greatly form what they wanted and by that I mean what they wrote they wanted. Also you can look at everything a person has done and with some what accuracy predict there actions in other situations. finally regardless of what century you live in you can tell right from wrong . also I never claimed to be smart or cool all I did was share a great mans though and you just acted like an ******* .
User avatar #131 to #128 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
you lack of relatively basic grammar skills disagree with you statement.
#129 to #128 - winglit (03/08/2013) [-]
Only you didnt share his thought you spouted his words without cause, fact is Ben Franklin leaned far more to the right in his life, and was in favor of the revolutionary war because it was the route to freedom, he was never against torture... at all, and i act like an ******* because people like you who act politically aware while spouting off quotes you dont actually understand... on both sides people do this, i hate them all equally, STOP using a dead mans words to fight your wars, the great men if they were alive today would hate to see everything this countries become, for one thing, Tohmas Jefferson wanted a revolution every couple decades "tree of liberty watered with the blood of patriots" any idea how many times ive heard that quote from both sides? it makes me sick, people taking these sayings so far out of context that itd be as accurate to say my above quote about Lincon! you dont use his words well, you dont do his action justice, you just sit there and spout about freedoms, and rights, and words you dont understand, dont just give a ******* quote give your own words, make your own opinion known because actually Ben Franklin was ok with torture... soldiers go into battle knowing full well they could be tortured if captured, he wouldnt like the patriot act, but really neither side does
User avatar #130 to #129 - timmywankenobi (03/08/2013) [-]
Clearly you have miss read what I said .I said Ben Franklin would oppose all the freedom stealing act and bills that were but in to action by bush and maintained by Obama, and he would be against not giving people trials in a court of law ! . I never said Ben Franklin wasn't more of a republican then a democrat I am fully aware he was and partisan lines have no bearing on anything I have said. I hardly think using one quote one time constitutes have a dead man fight my wars. who are you to tell me I don't understand ,you don't know anything about me !
it is not just the patriot act ,it's the legal video surveillance of citizen at any and all times and the legalizing of government wire taps on anyone's phones and the legal killing of any citizen by the military as longs as they say they were a terror threat and the ability to legally declare martial law at any time for any reason not to mention the drones are free to go anywhere and kill anyone without legal ramification. these things are what I was referring to not just torture that's just the tip of the iceberg. also I am not on any political side I am Independent . the only sides that concern me is right and wrong good and evil. "soldiers go into battle knowing full well they could be tortured if captured" the terrorists torture because they are desperate and filled with hate and they had no laws against it and many of them are mentally unstable . The military has no moral or reasonable justification for sinking to the level of mad men and if you can't understand that then it is you who doesn't understand.
User avatar #132 to #130 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
you think the military NOW is made up of mad men? you think it is better now to have men brutally bashing each others heads in with any available branch, torture the likes of which you cannot imagine, disemboweling your neighbor because you wanted their land, lopping children's heads off with an axe, the quick descent into madness that is the glory and horror of real battle. you think THAT isn't madness. you clearly are too naïve to speak of anything that matters. I know that I am too jaded. shut your GOD DAMNED MOUTH! you know nothing, you sick, twisted little worm of a man, whining about freedom whilst doing nothing to save to save it. go lie with the other dogs where you belong.
User avatar #101 - ihatecarltonbanks (03/06/2013) [-]
Canadians are Americans...
+3
#90 - swiftykidd **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #86 - timmywankenobi (03/06/2013) [-]
well maybe if the guy was a confirmed terrorist or if torturing for information actually worked which it hasn't .
#95 to #86 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
> which it hasn't

Sorry to burst your bubble of rainbow unicorn ponies which i call being a liberal ******** , but torture works. period. That's why we still have Guantanamo.
User avatar #99 to #95 - timmywankenobi (03/06/2013) [-]
Torture has no provided any credible information .Guantanamo is still open because fagget's like you were afraid to let the detainees face trial or be imprisoned on American soil and decided that they should **** on the constitution and suspend habius corpus and ignore the Geneva act.
User avatar #133 to #99 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
actually, if they are not U.S. citizens, the constitution says nothing on the matter. It actually says nothing to the letter of foreign policy, either. The Declaration of Independence and George Washington do, however. DON'T. ******* . DO IT.
#103 to #99 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
Afraid?
You misunderstand. I am not afraid of them taking advantage of their legal rights.

I simply believe that we are at war with them, as they have declared war on us, and as such, they can be treated as prisoners of war, whatever that entails.
Captured Japanese soldiers didn't get trials or legal rights. No one complains about that, because we were in a war.

Now, it is no different. Same **** Different Name.
User avatar #106 to #103 - timmywankenobi (03/06/2013) [-]
many detainees have not be proven to be terrorists. only "suspected"- that means they don't know. Also new laws were put in place after WII to make sure that **** didn't happen anymore but america ignored them as did the terrorists. secondly your going to prove to the middle east you're not evil by abducting random people torturing people with out trials or proof and killing thousands of civilians bombing entire cities because terrorist "might" be there but your the good guy's ? do you see how stupid that sounds . your going to beat the terrorists be becoming worse then them . "cause the only way to kill a monster is with a bigger monster."
User avatar #134 to #106 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
yeah, so collateral damage happens. get over it. people die. all the time. people don't matter that much.
#111 to #106 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
I wish we could play by the rules in war.

However, they don't play by the rules, and that, in my opinion, should forfeit their right to have us fight fair.
User avatar #113 to #111 - timmywankenobi (03/06/2013) [-]
so because the other team is playing dirty you should too . Shouldn't we be better then that ? Why should we be dragged down to their level ? We should prove we are better by being better !
#115 to #113 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
Morality has no place in a battlefield.
Let's be better at their game.

My terrorism is much more lethal than your terrorism. the only way to stop them is to end them, as threats cannot work, as they don't fear death.
User avatar #118 to #115 - timmywankenobi (03/06/2013) [-]
I disagree, you can catch more bee's with honey then vinegar.
User avatar #135 to #118 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
except when they are Africanized bees. then they kill you unless you kill them. and there, sir, is this war in a nutshell. a bunch of crazy dudes from the middle east who want to kill us all. us or them. those are our options.
#82 - turretbuddy (03/06/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#78 - seniorpokeman (03/06/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #81 to #78 - seniorpokeman (03/06/2013) [-]
If you can't read it:
Liberal: "Great... another photo of an abused iraqi prisoner! Those responsible should be severely punished! We should condemn all abuse and correction and humiliation and—"
Uncle Sam: "That's an American hostage."
Liberal: "Oh. Never mind."
#74 - thebritishguy (03/06/2013) [-]
who is to say they are the terrorists? British troops do all kinds of horrible things in the Middle East I'm sure over there we are the terrorists
#72 - anonymous (03/06/2013) [-]
American translation: I'm not sorry.
User avatar #70 - thebritishguy (03/06/2013) [-]
I don't know why the fact that it was an American or Canadian life, I would say "as long as it saves innocent lives"
#68 - anonymous (03/06/2013) [-]
Don Cherry is a ******* boss. He had an English bullterrier named blue who bit his wife. A friend told him he would have to get rid of her and Don said "I know. Me and Blue will really miss her".
#66 - anonymous (03/06/2013) [-]
Podaję hasło: Okoń
#64 - maskedguardianmkii (03/06/2013) [-]
The problem with this is that he was asked about the torture of suspected terrorists, not actual terrorists. We don't know if that "lying little camel shagger" is actually a terrorist.
#61 - anonymous (03/06/2013) [-]
Why is everyone so mad at terrorists? 9/11 happened more than 11 years ago and since 9/11 terrorists didn't do **** . 3000 victims, ************** . 'Murricans start a war at least every 10 years or so and kill way more people but nobody cares.
User avatar #63 to #61 - temporalguardian ONLINE (03/06/2013) [-]
Not to mention breaking up Yugoslavia by seeding distrust into the minds of all former-yugoslavian countries, and then bombing the **** out of one of them (including schools, airports, and other civilian buildings).
#62 to #61 - hockeynerd (03/06/2013) [-]
Terrorists are people who terrorizes someone or a group of people, regardless of where they are from. If I see an American terrorist who is planning on bombing a building in Iran, I'm gonna stop that ************ .
User avatar #136 to #62 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
actually a terrorist in this instance is an individual who uses guerilla(spelled right) tactics to instill fear, hatred, apprehension, and uncertainty into the targeted group. kind of like trolls, but usually with a much higher body count. basically a military who uses shock and awe as well as guerilla(also spelled right, check it if you want) tactics with no discrimination whatsoever.

TL;DR shut the **** up you know nothing about military tactics or modern events.
#139 to #136 - hockeynerd (03/09/2013) [-]
Actually it's guerrilla, with two R's. And It's funny how you think you're the only one who knows what it means. You're kinda just making yourself seem very stupid and ignorant. A terrorist literally means "a person, usually a member of a group, who uses or advocates terrorism." So please, sit down.
User avatar #140 to #139 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
we are not talking about the dictionary definition. we are talking about it in this specific context. semantics are everything.

by the way, thank you for correcting my spelling error, it's not a word I use or see often.
User avatar #58 - Vandeekree (03/06/2013) [-]
Maybe my opinion differs from the rest of funnyjunk, but i see nothing admirable about putting Canadian and American lives as more valuable that anyone else's.
User avatar #137 to #58 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
Whiny little bitch... I'm not conservative, mind you, but a kind of middle ground. identifying with a party is just asking for trouble, and naïve little pansy asses like you are the reason that nothing ever gets done.
#92 to #58 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
Its not just about Canadians and Americans.

A terrorist is a person that wishes ill being on anyone that does not agree with him, and will do anything to make his points known and accepted.

A person like that is a shame on the human race, and a stain on the tapestry of morality.

To say they are equal with other humans should be taken as offensive by the entirety of the human population.

Any person that wishes ill will on the innocents of another nation or culture because they don't share your opinions is a total piece of **** .

And you know what, valuing innocents of Canada and the USA more than a terrorist isn't admirable, its common ******* sense. If you don't, your stupidity is admirable.
User avatar #94 to #92 - Vandeekree (03/06/2013) [-]
Then me disagree. I don't think that the wrong someone has done or would do lessens their humanity in the least. Just because someone ******* or steals does not mean you should not see them as a human being. People love to create monsters out of others, but do you think there is a single person like that that wasn't pushed into doing it by something? If you look at it from their side you will see a person who doesn't deserve to lose their rights, they need help.
User avatar #138 to #94 - kagji (03/09/2013) [-]
i agree. let me see if I cant find some lead zanex for the ****** .
#100 to #94 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
Those that wish to or have done ill will have no place in a peaceable society.
And don't get me wrong, I still think they are humans. They just don't deserve to interact with the rest of us. I could care less if they didn't interact with innocents. However, they pursue war and death of the innocents based on twisted religious logic.


the only help they need is a 360 volts of help to rat out their towel head buddies that attack civilians since the country those civilians belong to isn't Islamic and is "sinful".

Can you really think that if an innocent or a terrorist had to die, that their lives are equal? Which one would you choose to Die?
User avatar #104 to #100 - Vandeekree (03/06/2013) [-]
Their lives are equal like it or not. If i had to choose i could not choose even though that hypothetical situation is quite rigged. You see, perhaps their logic is twisted, but that only shows that they need help. Now i agree that the easy way would be to simply kill/imprison anyone who doesn't see eye to eye with your moral code, but would not the right thing be to try and help those people see why they shouldn't be killing? Why save one life when you could save both the terrorist and the innocent? Not to mention you don't know who the bad guys are, so would you risk hurting one innocent man to bring in one terrorist?
#109 to #104 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
Don't misunderstand me,
I we could all hold hands and sing kumbaya, i'd be all for it.
If we could reason with terrorist, I'd be happy.
If we could convince them to not do it, I'd be happy.
One cannot reason with terrorists, their entirety of their being is unreasonable and they have been brainwashed by their elders into doing these things.


User avatar #112 to #109 - Vandeekree (03/06/2013) [-]
So then my next logical question would be how do you know that? How many terrorists have you tried to reason with?
See, you can't just use the cop out that they are brain washed because that could mean you are the one brain washed and they are the ones who are right. They don't know they're wrong? Then maybe you don't know you're wrong.
But in order for everyone to "hold hands and sing kumbaya" someone has to extend the first hand.
#116 to #112 - rety (03/06/2013) [-]
You don't need to be a chef to know something tastes like **** .

People that try to get their points across through the death of innocents and the promise of an afterlife cannot be turned from that path.

As for me, what if i'm wrong?
Then, I will die as wrong as i am now. Nothing will turn from my code of morality.
Nothing will turn them from theirs.

As for the hold hands and sing kumbaya, You can extend your hands, but i won't extend mine.

The are only two things i will ever offer a terrorist.

The first is a life rotting in a cell until they die if they rat out their friends.

The second is a pig-blood covered bullet.

You be you, sympathize and understand their plight. Hold out your hand, they may not kill you instantly and just ransom you, then kill you. They may torture you.

I'll be me, serving cupro-nickel jacketed diplomacy to any terrorist that encounters me.
User avatar #117 to #116 - Vandeekree (03/06/2013) [-]
Well if you are going to harden yourself up and refuse to change then yes, there is little hope of you changing, but you see not everyone refuses to change. They will not harm you if you rove you mean no harm to them. There is hope for every person, no one is too far gone. And i think your words are driven by fear, not understanding. If you would simply look at their side you will realize we cause their actions as much as they cause ours. There is a reason they want to kill us, it's because they do not know us or understand us just as we don't know them or understand them.
But let me assure you that if you go around killing anyone who you believe to be a terrorist, you are only going to make more terrorists, angry that their father was killed by an American.
User avatar #52 - randomnab (03/06/2013) [-]
Black is negative huh?

****** racist.
#54 to #51 - anonymousattorney (03/06/2013) [-]
Canadian, eh? Well, thanks for helping out with that *********** back in '79. We owe you guys for that one.
#55 to #54 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (03/06/2013) [-]
You mean Vietnam?
User avatar #56 to #55 - anonymousattorney (03/06/2013) [-]
That, and Iran.
#59 to #56 - solarisofcelestia ONLINE (03/06/2013) [-]
That war was trouble for everyone.
User avatar #60 to #59 - anonymousattorney (03/06/2013) [-]
Still, though. Figure saying thanks now and again for when we help each other out can't hurt. And, as for the Iran thing I'm referring to...Argo. That is all.
User avatar #46 - Zarke (03/06/2013) [-]
Does it really matter which is positive or negative if you're just hooking them up to somebody's balls?
[ 129 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)