Camera vs Eye. . use WHAT MY CAMERA SEES. but if camera don't see then how first picture? funny jokes laugh lol Camera eye Moon clouds
x
Click to expand

Comments(52):

[ 52 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - anonymous (03/04/2013) [+] (6 replies)
then how did you get the first picture?
User avatar #2 to #1 - mookiez (03/04/2013) [-]
With his eye.
#19 - beardarama (03/04/2013) [+] (8 replies)
but if camera don't see then how first picture?
but if camera don't see then how first picture?
User avatar #44 - HOLYCARP (03/04/2013) [+] (3 replies)
First picture; cloud behind moon.

Seems legit.
#54 - deezknuts (03/04/2013) [-]
Then how the hell did you get a picture of the first frame?
Then how the hell did you get a picture of the first frame?
#32 - CDMAN (03/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
What Stevie Wonder sees
#3 - HIMTheSixSixSix (03/04/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Because so far there has not been a camera that can match the dynamic range of our eyes.
#51 - DrollHumor (03/04/2013) [-]
Tripod, slow shutter speed, remote, telephoto lens.



Hooray for amateur photography!
#15 - anonymous (03/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
The human eye has been measured to be corresponding to a 695 megapixel camera.
User avatar #30 to #15 - exicuton (03/04/2013) [-]
>implying that megapixels have a lot to do with the quality of a picture
#47 - gunz (03/04/2013) [-]
What see.....
User avatar #6 - DrBobsPatient (03/04/2013) [+] (4 replies)
do you have a wallpaper size of the top pic?
#43 - ravyen (03/04/2013) [-]
I love irony. Don't you?
#38 - anonymous (03/04/2013) [-]
The second picture is the result of a shutter speed that captured too little light for the conditions present (nighttime) or an aperture that didn't let in enough light, probably even both. We don't have those problems as bad because our eyes naturally adjust to let in the right amount of light on our own, some cameras don't. If you can change the shutter speed and aperture and are getting the second photo, try slowing down the shutter speed and using a tripod. That will get you a result more like the first photo.
Anon out.
User avatar #37 - kingxddd (03/04/2013) [-]
It's not easy to take a photo of the stars at night
User avatar #28 - eddymolly (03/04/2013) [-]
Or just change your camera settings?
User avatar #26 - maddboiy (03/04/2013) [+] (2 replies)
appature problems
User avatar #23 - sorrowofdaedalus (03/04/2013) [-]
Actually, the human mind gives it the illusion of size due to the comparison of the moon's ACTUAL size compared to the threshold of the trees and the land itself as it raises. That's why the farther the moon gets up in the sky, the farther away it seems to get, even though the rotation of the moon isn't at so extreme an axis the size would change that drastically.
0
#18 - beardarama has deleted their comment [-]
#16 - tennisgoalie (03/04/2013) [-]
the first picture was taken with a long exposure shot
User avatar #14 - atkissonbr (03/04/2013) [+] (1 reply)
then how was the first pic taken?
#20 - bubblefoxee (03/04/2013) [-]
Your mind also "manipulates" the picture with the powerful tool called imagination or fantasy.
[ 52 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)