Cannibalism Is Cool. The title, taken literally, is a lie. So are the tags. i fucked your Mom
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (403)
[ 403 comments ]
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
#5 - nooneofinterest
Reply +106 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
#135 to #5 - anon id: 28ffceb5
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
SLUTS CAN READ MINDS!?
#295 to #5 - thatguyuknowtheone
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
What else would i be staring at?
What else would i be staring at?
#45 - ragingflamingos
Reply +100 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
Regardless if you are pro-choice or pro-life that has got to be the STUPIDEST argument I have ever heard for it.
User avatar #52 to #45 - ainsleyreborn
Reply -12 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
Most arguments for pro life are ridiculous anyway
#126 to #52 - anon id: 2464e6bc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
So are most arguments for pro-choice either.
#104 to #52 - anon id: 2464e6bc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
How are their arguments ridiculous?
According to you killing unborn humans isn't murder.
#177 to #104 - anon id: b861e943
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
because it isn't
#69 to #52 - anon id: 1d2ab831
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
I don't know why he is getting red-thumbs.
User avatar #327 to #52 - coldactill
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
I heard a story about a child at their 9th or 10th week in the womb being aborted, and during the operation, whilst being removed it held the doctors finger tightly and as the baby died it let go of his finger.. the doctor never operated another abortion, and even began to advocate against it. There are some pretty decent reasons out there for both sides, and you should always be open minded.
User avatar #387 to #327 - brettyoke
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
"heard a story"

You do realize that at 9 or 10 weeks a baby is still mostly a pink blob, right? For the most part, they don't have hands or fingers at that point.
User avatar #410 to #387 - coldactill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
I know that at week 7 the child begins to form arms..
User avatar #353 to #327 - jrondeau **User deleted account**
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Please cite that, I can't seem to find that story anywhere.
User avatar #83 to #52 - luquaz
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
I never understood the logic here. We are all pro-life and pro-choice. It's for or against abortion the argument is about.
User avatar #241 to #45 - sommerli
Reply -11 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
why is it a stupid argument?
#398 to #241 - anonymouspusy **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #373 to #241 - fredthemilkman
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
comment #4
User avatar #9 - stcronin
Reply +56 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
That doesn't make sense Abortion you are killing a developing cell with a full set of chromosomes who has a 20% chance of dying before birth anyways.

While sperm is haploid so it will never develop into anything unless it fertilizes an egg. I would think cannibalism would only apply to eating a humans tissues. Or fully developed cells
#12 to #9 - nightstar
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
20%?
User avatar #27 to #12 - stcronin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
I am studying Biochemistry and I am taking genetics and we learned 20% of all conceptions are aborted naturally due to chromosomal problems and other complications that can happen in the womb
User avatar #17 to #12 - impo **User deleted account**
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
That's a pretty scary number, isn't it?
User avatar #29 to #17 - stcronin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
Ya, and that is just natural, of all conceptions excluding abortion procedures 20% fail
User avatar #58 to #29 - jonebonez
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
I'm glad someone else out there is also a little more educated on the subject. Pro life people are so against things like birth control, yet they don't realize that using birth control would actually -save- fetuses from being aborted. Naturally at least.
User avatar #67 to #58 - stcronin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
Your logic doesn't make sense... The reason people are pro-life is because you are not giving the "child" even a chance to live. Everyone knows that miscarriages happen, but by purposefully removing/killing the fetus they see that as murder because it isn't natural the fetus/child is purposefully being removed/killed that is why it is viewed as unethical by some.

In the same regard that is why birth control is seen that way because it is seen as unnatural
User avatar #409 to #67 - jonebonez
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
I guess I should of used my words more carefully. I wasn't talking about miscarriages when you're 6- 12 weeks pregnant. The female body actually rejects fertilized eggs and just flushes them out with a normal period.

"Without Birth Control:
Out of 100 fertile women without birth control, 100 of them will ovulate in any given month.
Out of those 100 released eggs, 33 will become fertilized.
Out of those 33, 18% will be rejected by the uterus.
In a group of 100 women not on birth control: 6 zygotes will “die”
With Birth Control:
Out of 100 fertile women on birth control, around 6 of them will ovulate in any given month.
Out of those 6 released eggs, only 2 will become fertilized.
Out of those 2, 100% will be rejected by the uterus.
In a group of 100 women on birth control: 2 zygotes will “die”
"

It comes from a blog post from someone who did a bunch of research on the subject, and after doing a bit of my own the numbers matched up for me. It's even more eye opening for me considering the fact that it's coming from someone who used to be a pro life extremist.

I'm not sure if you're actually really interested in all of this, or if you were just making a random comment, but it was a good read. If you're interested (though it's kind of long) it's at You need to login to view this link l

Granted, yes. All of this happens naturally. But if pro-life peoples goal is to save zygotes/fetuses/children then why shouldn't they be for this? They're fighting the wrong cause.

Sorry for the long (and late) reply.
#75 to #67 - freeyourmind
Reply -7 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
dude shut up you pro-life mong
User avatar #76 to #75 - stcronin
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
I never said what I was I just explained their point of view
User avatar #32 to #9 - skubasteve
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
There are hundreds of studies done all ranging in different % ranges in regard to this subject. Its not a definitive number as of yet.
User avatar #39 to #32 - stcronin
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
In natural abortions though its 20% idk about the abortions done on purpose
User avatar #122 to #39 - skubasteve
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
This is in regard to natural abortions.
User avatar #239 to #122 - stcronin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Well they are pretty sure is it around 20%
User avatar #259 to #239 - skubasteve
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
And others are sure its higher while some say lower. Yes we just went over this. The studies can be based on a varitey of factors when it comes to testing chromosomal chemistry and comparison that are still up for debate.
User avatar #278 to #259 - stcronin
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Of course a lot of things are that way but by this point we can see with a lot of supportive evidence that it is around 20% and not a huge fluctuation of 10-40% is all I am trying to say
User avatar #263 to #9 - deezknuts
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
**** YOUR SCIENCE I GOTTA GO KILL SOME KIDS
#105 - dathunter
Reply +52 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
then i guess using a condom is kidnapping
User avatar #74 - ryukyukids
Reply +41 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
yeah right like a feminist swallows.
#81 - jtdoggs **User deleted account**
+31 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #331 to #81 - paesani
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Actualy, for every time you fap, you kill 3 times the population of the earth in sperm
#338 to #331 - jtdoggs **User deleted account**
+3 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #350 to #338 - paesani
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Don't fear it, EMBRACE IT. HUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUEHUE
#64 - tannerb
Reply +30 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
I am pro-choice but this sign makes no sense. Pro-life people claim that life starts at conception. A girl swallowing sperm is not conception. So the sign is complete bull. (Also by their logic jacking off is a murder)
#89 to #64 - pridefulmatthew
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
I just hate that they call themselves Pro-Life, they are Pro-Not Choice...every one that is Pro-Choice is not against life so why would the opposition call themselves differently..
#68 to #64 - anon id: 23a455a0
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
to get technical it would be cannabalism because you are consuming somthing that is paert of a human being, also I am pro life because in most cases abortions happen almost when the child is fully developed but i have no problem with the morning after pill that stops the egg from fertalizing, please no butt hurt just my opinion not yours
#80 to #68 - keggut **User deleted account**
+8 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#91 to #68 - autoxx
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(03/02/2013) [-]
The morning after pill causes an immediate menstrual cycle.
Fertilized or not, it's just hitting the "flush" lever.
#365 - I Am Monkey
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Regardless of were you stand on abortion, that argument it terrible.
Regardless of were you stand on abortion, that argument it terrible.
#367 to #365 - anon id: ebcc4588
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Depends on the argument being made..........
User avatar #394 to #365 - aldheim
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
But humorous.
#162 - deezknuts
Reply +19 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
The comments section is filled with people who understand the difference between a fetus/embryo/zygote and a sperm cell.   
   
   
it's like bill nye came down from heaven and made sweet science love to everyone and impregnated them with logic and reasoning
The comments section is filled with people who understand the difference between a fetus/embryo/zygote and a sperm cell.


it's like bill nye came down from heaven and made sweet science love to everyone and impregnated them with logic and reasoning
User avatar #181 to #162 - shiifter
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Oh jesus christ... nobody say anything about religion to this guy.
User avatar #189 to #181 - deezknuts
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Mom, Dad, Whaat is religion?
User avatar #254 to #162 - darman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
But is it right to abort that logic and reasoning? And where do we draw the line between the development of basic logic and reasoning to full blown intelligence?
User avatar #261 to #254 - deezknuts
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
I'm not sure where this is going but I like it
#403 to #162 - anonymouspusy **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #414 to #403 - deezknuts
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
and he's completely right
#416 to #414 - anonymouspusy **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #418 to #416 - deezknuts
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
yes, but if crestionists try to hinder astrological sciences as well as the basis of evolutiionary theory that drives the entire branch of psychology known as evolutionary pshychology, not to mention how denial of evolution serves to hinder further development in chemistry and biology, then they are holding the world back with their ignorance
#424 to #418 - anonymouspusy **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#249 to #162 - hardongo
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
you made having common sense sound so dirty and i like it
#226 - fyaq
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
Maybe cover your tits before trying to fight for women's rights.

just sayin.
#253 to #226 - namnori
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
I thought she was protesting against the abortion protesters... Now I realise how silly I have been.
I thought she was protesting against the abortion protesters... Now I realise how silly I have been.
#247 to #226 - keggut **User deleted account**
+15 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #401 to #247 - fyaq
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(03/03/2013) [-]
didnt say i wouldnt motorboat her.