| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
-
its not aloud becau- - Folding a T-Shirt
- Bad punoroo
- C'mon Son
- All Hail The King!
- Mission to Mars
- Non-wet T-shirt con-
- so cash
- This is one of my f-
- Who's carrying whom?
- WITH A STICK SHIFT
- Too Much of Anything
- simple jobs are the-
- going up
- Well ma'am..you won-
- Donuts
- Pennies
- More gaming facts
- FHFIF
- he has a small knife
Point of view
Uploaded by: eclecticparadigm
Benedict Arnold betrayed the Americans as he was loyal to the crown.
George Washington betrayed the crown as he was loyal to the Americans.
Jefferson Davis conquered the slaves while he tried to liberate CSA....more »
Benedict Arnold betrayed the Americans as he was loyal to the crown.
George Washington betrayed the crown as he was loyal to the Americans.
Jefferson Davis conquered the slaves while he tried to liberate CSA.
Abraham Lincoln conquered the CSA while he tried to liberate the slave.
TheodoreVan Kirk was a genocidal war hero when he dropped the nuke.
Hirohito was a genocidal war hero when he slaughtered more Asians than Hitler did to the number of Jews.
Kim Jong-un is...
| |
#7
-
wowewowe (02/24/2013) [+]
(3 replies)
Hirohito was a puppet controlled by the Military leaders of Japan; that's why he wasn't tried for his war crimes
#24
-
N. Korean citizen (02/25/2013) [+]
(5 replies)
>Lincoln
>went to war to free the slaves
This is gross historical revisionism. Lincoln did not give two shits about the slaves, did not believe it was his right to end slavery and was just as racist as every other white person of his era
>went to war to free the slaves
This is gross historical revisionism. Lincoln did not give two shits about the slaves, did not believe it was his right to end slavery and was just as racist as every other white person of his era
#43
-
metalbass (02/25/2013) [+]
(4 replies)
TheodoreVan Kirk had no say in the nuke. He was like any other soldier, and was given orders to fly over Hiroshima and drop the nuke. He didn't know its power or anything. He was just following orders
#19
-
beatiejuice **User deleted account** (02/25/2013) [+]
(1 reply)
whats kim jong un been up to lately?
#18
-
vileghas (02/24/2013) [-] I wouldn't be too quick to judge Kim Jong-Un... He did win the people's choice of Time's Person of the yea 2012.. Just sayin
#52
-
herpaderpasaur (02/25/2013) [-] I fail to see how anyone though Hirohito was a war hero and how anyone but slave owners though Jefferson Davis was a good guy but ok
#49
-
aproudpatriot ONLINE (02/25/2013) [-] Actually, Benedict Arnold was initially against the British and was even close friends with George Washington. It was only after he was rebuked for several of his actions as an officer, and gave him less important tasks, that made him feel like the revolutionaries didn't trust him, that he went over to the British side. Even then, the British still didn't trust him and still gave him less important tasks.
#44
-
dethmaul (02/25/2013) [-]
lol As I finished reading the description, I read in my head-voice "Kim Jong-Un is...Funny." As I clicked the thumb.
#39
-
anaklusmos (02/25/2013) [-]
Benedict did what he did because he was promised money and land not because he was "loyal' to the Crown.
#37
-
fattyacid (02/25/2013) [-]
If you want to get technical, Lincoln wasn't a conqueror or a liberator, Washington was not a loyalist (patriot or traitor, take your pick), and Jefferson Davis was not a conqueror.
Lincoln was quelling a rebellion or reuniting a split nation, either one.
Washington was a rebel (or a traitor to the crown) and the term loyalist was reserved for those loyal to British rule.
Davis didn't really conquer anything. His attacks offered him control over tracts of territory that lasted less than a few years.
See, a history major is good for something. Just kidding, it's useless.
Lincoln was quelling a rebellion or reuniting a split nation, either one.
Washington was a rebel (or a traitor to the crown) and the term loyalist was reserved for those loyal to British rule.
Davis didn't really conquer anything. His attacks offered him control over tracts of territory that lasted less than a few years.
See, a history major is good for something. Just kidding, it's useless.
#25
-
sockprague ONLINE (02/25/2013) [+]
(2 replies)
Jefferson Davis first announcement as confederate president was that he was going to abolish slavery. The was on of the conditions from Britain if they were going to ally with the south.
#23
-
nyuORlucy (02/25/2013) [-] george washington was on the side of the rebels making him a patriot not a loyalist. the patriots considered benedict a traitor and a loyalist
