Point of view. Benedict Arnold betrayed the Americans as he was loyal to the crown. George Washington betrayed the crown as he was loyal to the Americans. Jeffe
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Had a small DDOS. We're back now after I nulled some IPs.

hide menu

Point of view

Benedict Arnold betrayed the Americans as he was loyal to the crown.
George Washington betrayed the crown as he was loyal to the Americans.
Jefferson Davis conquered the slaves while he tried to liberate CSA.
Abraham Lincoln conquered the CSA while he tried to liberate the slave.
TheodoreVan Kirk was a genocidal war hero when he dropped the nuke.
Hirohito was a genocidal war hero when he slaughtered more Asians than Hitler did to the number of Jews.
Kim Jong-un is...

+489
Views: 28970
Favorited: 20
Submitted: 02/24/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(56):

[ 56 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#7 - wowewowe (02/24/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Hirohito was a puppet controlled by the Military leaders of Japan; that's why he wasn't tried for his war crimes
User avatar #2 - ilikeeatingcheese (02/24/2013) [+] (13 replies)
Loyalist means you support the crown dude
User avatar #26 - megaton ONLINE (02/25/2013) [+] (1 reply)
i am confused whos point of view is this from.
#41 - psykojet (02/25/2013) [+] (1 reply)
How dare you insult items
User avatar #43 - metalbass (02/25/2013) [+] (4 replies)
TheodoreVan Kirk had no say in the nuke. He was like any other soldier, and was given orders to fly over Hiroshima and drop the nuke. He didn't know its power or anything. He was just following orders
#47 to #43 - BuffaloSpringfield (02/25/2013) [-]
I've been at the mercy of men just following orders.
I've been at the mercy of men just following orders.
#24 - anonymous (02/25/2013) [+] (5 replies)
>Lincoln
>went to war to free the slaves

This is gross historical revisionism. Lincoln did not give two ***** about the slaves, did not believe it was his right to end slavery and was just as racist as every other white person of his era
User avatar #40 to #36 - karson (02/25/2013) [-]
I have to agree with anon. Lincoln was quite racist. Slaves weren't even made an issue until 1863, when the war started in 1861.
+1
#19 - beatiejuice **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
User avatar #18 - vileghas (02/24/2013) [-]
I wouldn't be too quick to judge Kim Jong-Un... He did win the people's choice of Time's Person of the yea 2012.. Just sayin
User avatar #16 - TheOriginalNerd (02/24/2013) [-]
washington wasnt always a loyalist though
User avatar #52 - herpaderpasaur (02/25/2013) [-]
I fail to see how anyone though Hirohito was a war hero and how anyone but slave owners though Jefferson Davis was a good guy but ok
User avatar #49 - aproudpatriot (02/25/2013) [-]
Actually, Benedict Arnold was initially against the British and was even close friends with George Washington. It was only after he was rebuked for several of his actions as an officer, and gave him less important tasks, that made him feel like the revolutionaries didn't trust him, that he went over to the British side. Even then, the British still didn't trust him and still gave him less important tasks.
#44 - dethmaul (02/25/2013) [-]
lol As I finished reading the description, I read in my head-voice "Kim Jong-Un is...Funny." As I clicked the thumb.
#39 - anaklusmos (02/25/2013) [-]
Benedict did what he did because he was promised money and land not because he was "loyal' to the Crown.
#37 - fattyacid (02/25/2013) [-]
If you want to get technical, Lincoln wasn't a conqueror or a liberator, Washington was not a loyalist (patriot or traitor, take your pick), and Jefferson Davis was not a conqueror.

Lincoln was quelling a rebellion or reuniting a split nation, either one.
Washington was a rebel (or a traitor to the crown) and the term loyalist was reserved for those loyal to British rule.
Davis didn't really conquer anything. His attacks offered him control over tracts of territory that lasted less than a few years.

See, a history major is good for something. Just kidding, it's useless.
#33 - anonymous (02/25/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Not that I'm promoting slavery or anything, but doesn't our constitution guarantee states the right to secede from the union if they feel their rights are being violated?
User avatar #42 to #33 - azraelthemage (02/25/2013) [-]
What started the Civil war was that Lincoln wanted to re-unite all the states that seceded in the most peaceful way possible. If it meant keeping slavery in the south, he was willing to allow it. However, if that were the case, it would've been slowly chipped away and eventually banned. The Confederates knew this, thus, war broke out.
User avatar #22 - churrundo (02/25/2013) [-]
Does Hirohito mean "wide person"? i'm starting to learn japanese
User avatar #20 - gavroche (02/25/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Arnold wasn't a traitor the whole war though...
#17 - intrepidy (02/24/2013) [-]
Actually that isn't true regarding benedict, he intially supported America, but he got betrayed and screwed over plenty of times by your government to the point were he switched sides.   
   
source:Cracked.com
Actually that isn't true regarding benedict, he intially supported America, but he got betrayed and screwed over plenty of times by your government to the point were he switched sides.

source:Cracked.com
User avatar #1 - cleverguy (02/24/2013) [-]
this is a good post, very interesting
[ 56 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)