Online Journalism In A Nutshell. OC. Online Journalism In A Nutshell OC
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (39)
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#1 - lolturtle
-63 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#3 to #1 - seroliser
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
Not sure if trolling
#23 to #1 - sircopperman
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#2 to #1 - breakfastlunch
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
Well, do you expect OP to create a news site and publish an article in it next time?
Well, do you expect OP to create a news site and publish an article in it next time?
#5 to #2 - anon id: 3f67a312
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
I am not a rocket scientist but last time i checked

OC meant Original Creation

And like i said before I am not a rocket scientist but taking a screenshot can be described as copying that what you as "Original Poster" see.

so if he really wanted to label it as OC at least make a drawing or write at least something what you have created instead of copying other one's work

but I can be wrong as I am not a rocket scientist like i said before
#6 to #5 - breakfastlunch
Reply -9 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
You've got a point.


I hereby give OP about 25% OC for this post, as it is apparently not a repost and I assume OP was the one who took the screenshot, not someone on Reddit or something.
User avatar #8 to #6 - I Am Monkey [OP]
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
It's not a screenshot, it's a photoshop I made as a parody of gizmodo and online journalism in general.
User avatar #7 to #1 - I Am Monkey [OP]
Reply +74 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
Did you actually think this was real? It's a photoshop I made practically from scratch. The only parts of it from the original website are the header and the like/share box.
User avatar #10 to #7 - fargone
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
I think he may have been implying that your humorous photoshop was indistinguishable from reality.
User avatar #34 to #7 - koocluks
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
i r baboon
#9 to #7 - SunilCCXXXVII **User deleted account**
Reply -4 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
I think you need to help everyone OP.
#4 - pappathethird
Reply +65 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
User avatar #11 to #4 - bitchplzzz
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
>One boring journal in the news
>ERMAGERSH ALL JOURNALISM ARE DIE!!
User avatar #12 to #11 - pappathethird
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
It's just a joke. And the article is not 'boring', It's a complete mockery.
#13 to #12 - bitchplzzz
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
you get my point though, rite
you get my point though, rite
User avatar #14 to #13 - Riukanojutsu
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
>it was a joke
User avatar #15 - colegaleener
Reply +29 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
"what is linux? we don't know either"
fuking lol
#19 - piobaireachd
Reply +12 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
#18 - felixjarl
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
We live in a world where people with talent in singing receive more notoriety and fame than live saving scientists. It is a sad world.
We live in a world where people with talent in singing receive more notoriety and fame than live saving scientists. It is a sad world.
#21 to #18 - anon id: ba045d88
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
Entertainers being recognized for being entertaining? What a concept.

Besides, you act like that hasn't been the entire duration of human history. Do you think anybody knew who Isaac Newton was until after he died?
#39 to #21 - anon id: f9472603
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
yes, yes they most certainly did.
#29 to #18 - lvlarcopolio **User deleted account**
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #31 to #18 - pulluspardus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
people with talent in singing ? name me one please.
#32 to #31 - themagicwizard
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
only if you can squeeze a little more antagonism into that comment.
User avatar #35 to #32 - pulluspardus
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
I Refuse to antagonize !
User avatar #20 to #18 - ingabenwetrust
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
life*
#22 to #20 - felixjarl
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
#33 to #18 - andyshandy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
A fellow Loading Ready Run fan?
A fellow Loading Ready Run fan?
#24 to #18 - feelythefeel
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
>We live in a world where people with talent in singing receive more notoriety and fame than live saving scientists. It is a sad world.
>where people with talent in singing receive
>people with talent
>talent
>Implying most current popular musicians have talent
User avatar #26 to #24 - lafuriaroja
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
HURRR DURRRR POP STARS ARE STOOPID!!!11!!!
#27 to #26 - feelythefeel
Reply -2 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
User avatar #28 to #26 - codyxvasco
Reply -3 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
....Basically.
User avatar #17 - deadmice
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
Journalism is kill?
#30 to #17 - youngmoneysobased
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
no :(
#25 to #17 - drunkenmonkeydk
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
no
User avatar #16 - illegalartist
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/24/2013) [-]
aka yahoo news reporting
User avatar #37 - imnotkickthecat
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
I laughed. Will you make more?
#38 to #37 - I Am Monkey [OP]
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
I made this one for Kotaku a while back.
User avatar #36 - sympathyforme
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/25/2013) [-]
Remember when Kotaku was not full of retards? Those were the days.