Typical libs. . lla? Will’!!! Panama.. People really need to start distinguishing the difference between a liberal and a trendy lefty. We have them here in England and we know the difference. Trendy
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

Typical libs

lla? Will’!!! Panama.
...
+478
Views: 18235
Favorited: 19
Submitted: 02/14/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to LocoJoe E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(136):

[ 136 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
+16
#30 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #2 - shinigamigod (02/14/2013) [+] (7 replies)
People really need to start distinguishing the difference between a liberal and a trendy lefty.
We have them here in England and we know the difference.
Trendy Lefties defend the left decisions and crucify the right regardless of what they may be without knowing anything about actual politics.
Then there are liberals who actually understand politics.
You can tell the difference after talking to one about politics within the first few words of their sentence.
#8 - lordhaha (02/14/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Hoozah, something a moderate or conservative can find funny kinda, Thumbs to you
#13 to #8 - widar (02/14/2013) [-]
I'll just point out the obvious: Obama has no problem at all with capitalism.
#22 - pebar (02/14/2013) [+] (8 replies)
--It's paranoia to have insurance?   
--Why are they telling people what they can and cannot own?   
--Why do they think it's ok to have children behind Obama when he signed the 23 executive orders but perverted when the NRA says you should have armed security to protect your kids just like the president?   
--Why do they think scary looking guns are different from "traditional rifles?"   
--Why do they not know what an assault rifle is?   
--Why do they think gun shows is a free market for gun trade (dealers still have to run background checks and individuals can't sell guns apart from their private collection)?   
--Why is it horrible that the NRA does what it's supposed to and makes money from it but capitalism is good?   
--Why do they think they deserve the wealthy people's money?   
--Why are they so stupid when it comes to economics?   
--Why do they so moved by propaganda and vote based solely on their emotions and don't even think about the consequences of their actions?   
   
(was getting a little biased at the end, I know)   
It's lonely in the politics board
--It's paranoia to have insurance?
--Why are they telling people what they can and cannot own?
--Why do they think it's ok to have children behind Obama when he signed the 23 executive orders but perverted when the NRA says you should have armed security to protect your kids just like the president?
--Why do they think scary looking guns are different from "traditional rifles?"
--Why do they not know what an assault rifle is?
--Why do they think gun shows is a free market for gun trade (dealers still have to run background checks and individuals can't sell guns apart from their private collection)?
--Why is it horrible that the NRA does what it's supposed to and makes money from it but capitalism is good?
--Why do they think they deserve the wealthy people's money?
--Why are they so stupid when it comes to economics?
--Why do they so moved by propaganda and vote based solely on their emotions and don't even think about the consequences of their actions?

(was getting a little biased at the end, I know)
It's lonely in the politics board
+9
#25 - whyisthissohard **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (14 replies)
User avatar #49 - Zarke (02/14/2013) [+] (11 replies)
We have fire extinguishers for a reason. We sincerely hope that a kitchen fire doesn't flare up. However, we're aware of the possibility, however small it may be. Same reason why people carry concealed. They usually don't want trouble. They just realize that trouble happens, and one day they may be involved in it. Same could be said for a government going tyrannical. Nobody wants it to happen, and that happening could be decades, centuries, or even months from now. But why would you deny someone the means of dealing with it in the best way they can as a single person just because you think it can't possibly happen? Nobody's telling you to rip the seatbelts out of your car because you're a safe, responsible driver. **** happens. Some people just see a need to prepare for the worst possible scenario.
User avatar #47 - rhiaanor ONLINE (02/14/2013) [+] (1 reply)
>fj
>12 year olds who think they know politics
>valentines day
>political posts
#53 - anonymous (02/14/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Oh hey look people on funnyjunk trying to understand politics again. Thats cute.
#57 to #53 - anonymous (02/14/2013) [-]
Care to post some rebuttals, or are you just gonna be an offensive dick?
#72 - lackofcareingerer (02/14/2013) [+] (5 replies)
i like obama but i dont think bush was a nazi dictator... i have no party i guess
User avatar #92 to #72 - bigbeaufort (02/15/2013) [-]
Not all parties are the extremes.

Not all liberals agree with abortion and gun control laws

Not all conservatives are Religious fanatics who carry guns.

There is in fact middle ground, though everyone refuses to see it.
#11 - freeyourmind (02/14/2013) [+] (4 replies)
Bush WAS tyrannical you uneducated piece of ****
#58 to #11 - theburtonbullett (02/14/2013) [-]
liberalism is pretty ******* close to fascism look it up.
#118 - greatgatsby (02/15/2013) [-]
dear comments
#96 - tranminh ONLINE (02/15/2013) [+] (19 replies)
Here's why I think the gun law do need to be changed:

1. In the event that your house is invaded, does one really need to have a 30 round AR or any other assault rifle to protect yourself with?

I think not, if you can't take down your target with 1 bullet, you really need to learn to shoot. Against pretty much any intruder a hunting rifle should be good enough anyway. You don't even need to shoot to kill, just brandish it and pop a shot in the air, they'll probably be scared for their lives.

2. Defence against the government

The US army has access to predator drones, tanks, aircraft and so much more weaponry in their arsenal than you can ever afford. Even if gun laws don't change, you don't stand a chance. If the government wants you dead, you're dead, regardless of whether you arm yourself with an assault rifle or a hunting rifle.

3. The world changes

The constitution was made during the time when it took a minute to reload 1 bullet, that has to be kept in mind. Times change, and so does the rules. History tells, any nation with rigid, strict and tradtitional laws are prone to self destruction. Reformation is always the answer.
User avatar #102 to #96 - byposted (02/15/2013) [-]
I think not, if you can't take down your target with 1 bullet, you really need to learn to shoot. Against pretty much any intruder a hunting rifle should be good enough anyway. You don't even need to shoot to kill, just brandish it and pop a shot in the air, they'll probably be scared for their lives.
Completely subjective.

The US army has access to predator drones, tanks, aircraft and so much more weaponry in their arsenal than you can ever afford. Even if gun laws don't change, you don't stand a chance. If the government wants you dead, you're dead, regardless of whether you arm yourself with an assault rifle or a hunting rifle.
"I don't understand how revolutions work." Revolutions usually play as gorilla wars. The government's arsenal of million dollar weapons will not do to well in a gorilla war. See: Vietnam, Afghanistan, Toyota War, and the recent Dorner debacle which caused the LAPD to go into a frenzy (JUST ONE MAN).

The constitution was made during the time when it took a minute to reload 1 bullet, that has to be kept in mind. Times change, and so does the rules. History tells, any nation with rigid, strict and tradtitional laws are prone to self destruction. Reformation is always the answer.
I agree. Since we are becoming a non-White nation we need to scrap those old racists and make Obama the founding father. Just like Chris Rock said,

"Obama your daddy."
#91 - ronniedrew (02/15/2013) [+] (3 replies)
#104 to #91 - abstract (02/15/2013) [-]
Republican primaries were ****** . I hope that a Libertarian party will emerge in America soon.
User avatar #15 - thedrgonzo (02/14/2013) [-]
As someone who considers himself relatively liberal, I never thought Bush was going to be a tyrant, I just thought he was a retard.
#78 - litobahamas (02/14/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I'm convinced that Americans eventually hate all persons they elect into office. And they seem to hate them for trying their best
I'm convinced that Americans eventually hate all persons they elect into office. And they seem to hate them for trying their best
#64 - disiple (02/14/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Anyone else thinks her hair is gross as 						****					? Looks like 						*******					 carpet.
Anyone else thinks her hair is gross as **** ? Looks like ******* carpet.
User avatar #61 - jippoman (02/14/2013) [-]
News today says that Missouri wants to push a Bill for complete assault weapon and High Cap. mag confiscation. LIBS ARE ON THE MOVE.!!!
User avatar #50 - Necrophelia (02/14/2013) [-]
everytime i see that picture i want to punch my computer screen
#32 - DeadlyHorizons (02/14/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Sic semper tyrannis, bi-atch
Sic semper tyrannis, bi-atch
#12 - niggernazi (02/14/2013) [-]
libtards
[ 136 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)