| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#19
-
probablynaked (02/13/2013) [-] 
Unless one of the competing explanations just happens to be the truth..
#23 to #19
-
retris (02/13/2013) [-] It's Occam’s razor, for example we could be living in something like the matrix, however there's no evidence for this so even though both theories are possible, the more complex one is not accepted unless there is compelling evidence for it. That's why it's a good thing science is adaptable.
#37 to #23
-
awesomenessdefined (02/13/2013) [-] We can prove the we aren't living in the matrix.
Here's how.
If the machines were using us for the 'voltage' an average human produces, they would know that it's easier to keep one human alive than to have a new one born. So, seeing that people are dying, they would modify it. They haven't yet, therefor, they don't exist, so we aren't in the matrix.
Of course there's a ton of other ways to prove it.
Here's how.
If the machines were using us for the 'voltage' an average human produces, they would know that it's easier to keep one human alive than to have a new one born. So, seeing that people are dying, they would modify it. They haven't yet, therefor, they don't exist, so we aren't in the matrix.
Of course there's a ton of other ways to prove it.
