Theory vs. Truth. Not mine. evident! We perform an experment, and u gaes us Mame. We mm more , and my gare us mare evidence We can canned the dots of evidence a Theory vs Truth Not mine evident! We perform an experment and u gaes us Mame mm more my gare mare evidence can canned the dots of a
Upload
Login or register

Theory vs. Truth

Click to block a category:GamingPoliticsNewsComicsAnimeOther
evident!
We perform an experment, and u gaes us Mame.
We mm more , and my gare us mare evidence
We can canned the dots of evidence and came up with a Meow.
But there con be Means: lo explai the evidence
As we gamut mum ,
Cgpik: ; aiit
we mu We demonstrably memes
iraniie:
M means make assumption
but we mm make fewer assumtions are more be hue.
So we lend to locus on the theory Wm. the fewest assumptions.
ms allows us to gas as accurate 5 picture as we tun.
Our Theory The mm.
may new be completely uncurse, but an closer man the competing explanations
...
+1478
Views: 41310 Submitted: 02/12/2013
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (119)
[ 119 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
#9 - lordofthesea
Reply +193 123456789123345869
(02/12/2013) [-]
PROOF!
#65 to #9 - anon id: e764821f
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
people complain about reposts, and I see over and over 20 times a day. Its not even funny. At all.
User avatar #90 to #65 - lordofthesea
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
you seem to have accidentally a noun in that statement
User avatar #73 to #9 - Maadmann
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Oh **** the Illuminati is real.
#8 - givemethesalt
Reply +100 123456789123345869
(02/12/2013) [-]
#87 - mvtjets
Reply +45 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Two dots were added, then six theories were made.    
   
2 x 6 = 12    
   
Afterwards, two more dots were added, and five theories were proven wrong.    
   
12 - 2 = 10    
10 / 5 = 2    
   
Finally, one theory was proven to be most likely.    
   
2 + 1 = 3    
   
   
Half-life 3 confirmed
Two dots were added, then six theories were made.

2 x 6 = 12

Afterwards, two more dots were added, and five theories were proven wrong.

12 - 2 = 10
10 / 5 = 2

Finally, one theory was proven to be most likely.

2 + 1 = 3


Half-life 3 confirmed
#105 to #87 - certifiedidiot
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Halt it right there!

You may know or may not know, but Gabe Newell has in fact confirmed a brand new engine in the late stages of development AND that ''Ricochet 2'' being in development too.

Ricochet 2 in this case, being code for Half-Life 3.
User avatar #129 to #105 - wakami
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Damnit, I would have loved it being ACTUALLY Ricochet 2...
#110 to #87 - tsoper
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #91 to #87 - lordofthesea
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
User avatar #89 to #87 - cherryb
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
I could watch this gif forever.
User avatar #100 to #89 - burdenedsoul
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
agreed
#39 - omegadynasty
Reply +43 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
The absence of evidence is not the evidence of absence! - Gin Rummy
#43 to #39 - anon id: 4bedc582
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Please don't start this
#56 to #43 - shiningbass
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
But anon, we must, because there are known knowns and that there are known unknowns. But there are also unknown unknowns; things we don't know that we don't know.
#50 to #43 - suckmyrichard **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
#54 to #39 - anon id: 9b26c55d
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
then unicorns exist
#80 to #54 - omegadynasty
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Yes they do.    
If you want to know the secret of being, you will come with us.
Yes they do.
If you want to know the secret of being, you will come with us.
User avatar #116 to #39 - cullenatorguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Let's see some evidence for the lack of absence. It goes both ways.
#60 to #39 - supamario
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
boondocks thread GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
boondocks thread GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
#69 to #60 - albinoman
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
#99 to #60 - lecherouslad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
amidoingitrite?
#58 - englman
Reply +36 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
#1 - commentorman
Reply -78 123456789123345869
(02/12/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#24 to #1 - mnan
Reply +4 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #2 to #1 - ajaxthegreat
Reply +35 123456789123345869
(02/12/2013) [-]
Stay proud of your ignorance
#35 - cullenatorguy
Reply +21 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
I feel like it would be a little closer to the circle rather than a pentagon. It would be hollow as well.

I'll use the theory of evolution as an example.
We've got a fairly accurate understanding of how evolution works (fairly=extremely) so we understand the whole process. However, evolutionary links are still being discovered to this day. I think the outline of the circle should represent how well we understand a theory and the inside to represent the details of theory. My diagram looks something like this.
#45 to #35 - anon id: b41d4818
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Replace truth with creationism and you've got it.
User avatar #51 to #45 - lapsushominum
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Hi, Zlamous.
User avatar #96 to #35 - udo
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Cullenatorguy must have a feces encyclopedia, because this guy knows his ****.
#66 to #35 - coldactill
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
We're discovering more and more molecules everyday (implying whats inside the circle is fluid). Your drawing to the left is a little inaccurate, because I'm fairly positive we haven't found half of all the missing links there are. I changed it to make it a little more accurate.
User avatar #77 to #66 - SenorButtPlug
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Every single living thing that has ever existed on Earth is a "missing link".
User avatar #94 to #66 - cullenatorguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
I fully agree that that's an accurate portrayal of how much knowledge we have of everything to the finest detail about evolution, but I was more or less referring to the broad definition of the Theory of Evolution.
User avatar #97 to #94 - coldactill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
So then I guess there are two theories of evolution? The broad one which is a belief, that you described, and then the evidence pointing to that being true, which I described. Sometimes it's hard to tell which one people are referring to
User avatar #103 to #97 - cullenatorguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
When I say evolution, I don't refer to the micro-evolution of individual molecules. It isn't so much two different definitions, rather, two different aspects to the same theory.
User avatar #107 to #103 - coldactill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Yeah absolutely, sometimes people refer to the aspect of belief when they say evolution and sometimes they refer to the evidence found. I heard someone say that the theory of evolution is as much a theory as is the theory of relativity, and both are equally true. But evolution is a belief with little solid evidence, which we have already established. Would you agree to that?
User avatar #111 to #107 - cullenatorguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Not at all. Massive amounts of evidence exist to support evolution. The fossil record and genetics being key aspects of the evidence. I took the liberty of looking up a nice, trustworthy source to explain these aspects. Smithsonian seemed pretty good.

humanorigins.si.edu/evidence

User avatar #118 to #111 - coldactill
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Interesting, I'll have a look. I'm a christian by the way, I firmly believe in God, but i find that talking to my christian peers gets me absolutely nowhere because they're already as firmly biased as I am. I only really discover things when people actually question what I'm thinking.
User avatar #121 to #118 - cullenatorguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
It's the only way anyone will ever grow in understanding :)
#75 to #35 - mondominiman
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Wait you're telling me pepsi had it right this entire time?
#3 - Rellikthebrit
Reply +17 123456789123345869
(02/12/2013) [-]
That's incorrect the truth is actually more like a bubble bath from a objective and non linear point of view. well it isn't and it is. wellll it's actually nothing like a bubble bath. But if that works for you the truth is a bubble bath.
That's incorrect the truth is actually more like a bubble bath from a objective and non linear point of view. well it isn't and it is. wellll it's actually nothing like a bubble bath. But if that works for you the truth is a bubble bath.
#4 to #3 - anon id: 197b4aab
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/12/2013) [-]
No.
#26 to #3 - huchkizz
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
User avatar #5 to #3 - golemnardah
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(02/12/2013) [-]
were you trying to sound smart?
User avatar #13 - Soilwork
Reply +14 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
i knew only pentagons could be trusted
User avatar #20 to #13 - TardytheTurtle
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
your avatar just made me **** myself and fear for my future wife
#14 - stillanonymous
Reply -15 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
the circle doesn't pass through all the points.
the circle doesn't pass through all the points.
#30 to #14 - feelythefeel
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Yes it does. Nobody said that the edges had to be on them.
#16 to #14 - fackyazombies [OP]
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Who said the truth made sense?
User avatar #17 to #14 - aulubear
Reply +13 123456789123345869
(02/13/2013) [-]
Uh.. Yea it does.