Sexy

Hue...

Managed to drag it at just the right moment.

You get thumbs yet i get downvoted :c

I don't make the rules, I just fuck with 'em.

Fuck the rules you say?

HERESY.

Uhh... uhh...

What were you saying?

YOU!
Spreading heresy again?

You bet your sweet lovely ass i am!

Bring it on.

Must... resist... heresy...

Time for my last resort...

SLOTH MARINE!

Oh saints! You got me laughing there!

I surrender, the heresy is too strong. Good show, sir.

Welcome to the club mate.

Welcoming party?

All included.

I've run out of funny.

That is sad, for i still got more heresy.

I'll just keep posting stuff for your heresy to feed on then

The reinforcements have arrived! You're done for now felixjarl, you HERETIC!

Even if this is my demise the imaterium will spit me out again, no force can stop me!

We outnumber you, HERETIC! Surrender and face Imperial Justice!

I might die this day! but even so i will not leave without the victory of having destroyed your boners!

And everytime you return we will purge the fuck out of you!!

I the chosen of the tit god is not to be banished forever. A day will come!

Bjorn the Fell-Hande inbound to PURGE THE HERESY!!

Quit your cowering felixjarl! We know you're there!

WHAT IS THIS??????

that orc....what the fuck....





also we hit the reply maximum

Well, i am not a CHAOS cultist for nothing.

The Emperor be blessed, we know exactly how to deal with that shit

Just going to put this one here...

YOU FUCKING.....!

And that is leaving call. Thanks for the fun mate.

Nothing is more fun than corrupting the ''loyal'' imperium.

Well then, godbye. It was indeed much fun and have a good day, heretic

We will meet again imperialist, next time i might try techpriest.

As an inquisitor of the Ordo Xenos, I'm 99% sure that the thread below falls under my jurisdiction......

If you are christian, then there are nearly 2700 recorded gods that you dont believe in just cause athiests dont believe what you do doesnt mean you can call them stupid or ignorant.
Athiests dont go out of there way to bash homosexuals or pro-choice people if anyone is being ignorant here it is you saying that we are wrong. You have no proof you are right and we have no proof that you are wrong so everyone needs to shut the fuck up, get on the floor and walk the dinosaur

Atheists are ignorant?

Did you know the quote isn't even from an atheist?

If anyone here is spreading "faggorty" here it's you.

Yes an anti-religious post WASNT posted by an atheist on FJ.

It was probably posted by an atheist. But lip is saying that the quote was not created by one.

People may have reformed the Church, but that says nothing about the inerrancy of their faith. Their faith is still nonsense. Nor does it change the fact that the Church has been instrumental, and continues to be instrumental, in retarding society by suppressing. Lest we forget the imprisonment of Galileo and the threats of torture made against him?

Still, I have to hand it to the Catholics, at least they acknowledge evolution as conflicting with scripture. I'd say Protestantism and Calvinism are the worst offenders of reason and inquiry, at present.

the big bang theory?

Was first proposed by a Catholic monk, and is not held in dispute pretty much anywhere.

I think a lot of Christians just say God caused the Big Bang. There's nothing wrong with that.

The Pope and the roman Catholics can be wrong, which in this case they are.
http://www. youtube .com/watch?v=KtC1x69F28U

Watch the whole lecture and you will see that evolution is not a fact but a fairy tale.

you see that's the funny things about facts, even if you don't belive in them they still true

Too bad evolution is a fact -_-
Could you mean abiogenesis?

Evolution is not a fact but a theory.
Theory; a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.

We argued for too long, I can't answer your last post because of all the purples.
"But if there is not evolution that means we were created so that proves he exists so it's not a problem."
That's called "the argument from ignorance" aka "I don't know what else could've done it, so there is no other way."
You have to prove God's existence, no matter whether the theory of evolution is true or not. That's what I meant with "they don't understand the nature of evidence"
Disproving God wouldn't confirm evolution either.
I mean, did you seriously think it goes like this
"We have fossil record of various different stages of animals and observed evolution, that could explain how they lead to one another and the beings today, but we can't possibly proof that, so we are just gonna take one of 1870 mystical entities that has been talked about in the history of humanity and say that did it, even though we can't proof that either."
are you even aware of how silly that sounds?

I decided to look for someone who was not a creationist to tell you the problems with evolution.
http://www. [url deleted] v=KtC1 x69F28U

youtube dot com

You still seemingly don't understand the difference between evolution (fact) and the theory of evolution.
And the "link" provided leads to Dr. Mike Riddle again.

Evolution, the change in the gene over the passing of generation is an observed fact.
The theorie of evolution, that explains how species came to be, is a theory, yes.
But it's the single best explanation, that only one that has made predictions that came true and hasn't been proven wrong since.

Actually Micro-evolution is just the change of dominant and recessive traits in the DNA of cells( also known as genetic variance) but it is not macro evolution which is the changing from one species to another .

Makroevolution is only what microevolution can do over time. There is no difference other than that. Concratulations for falling for that common creationist argument.
Oh and btw, those two are of course part of the theorie of evolution...

Micro evolution only works with the DNA the organism already has! Macro evolution requires new DNA that 1. is beneficial and 2. a modifier.

Are you cutting out mutations again?

Almost all mutations either have no affect or are harmful to the organism.
www.answersingenesis.org/articles/cfl/mutations

Ah, that site. There goes your credibility.
I won't start refuting the arguments from that site again.
Have a good day sir.

Did you even read it?

the site "answersingenesis" is very familiar to me.
it's a site that claims to be scientific, but doesn't understand the nature of evidence.

But did you read the article?

Yes, the first half, and it's exactly the bullshit that I expected.
I am not gonna waste my time pointing it out; seriously, if you want to believe that, please do so. I am tired and sick of those people who can't present their cases and that's it.
Why isn't there a single creationism site, that can proof their case without mentioning evolution? It works the other way around, you know -_-...

What about a lecture on why evolution doesn't work?
[url deleted]

http://www. [url deleted]

funny junk is good at stopping my links to youtube.
http://www. youtube . com /watch? v=KtC1 x69F28U

Watched the first part. Could barely hold back my laughter.
"If evolution is true, there should be observable evidence to support these transitions."
Of course he is bringing up "transitional forms" as problem... because if there aren't fossil records of the evolution of EVERY SINGLE species, evolution sure must be false.
How I love those creationist claims, they always go like this
"Oh, you can only prove 90% of your points? How sweet, I have a magical entity in the sky that can do 100% of what I claim. Clearly my point is better."
Pathetic.

The Cambrian explosion has no transitional fossils and you don't think that's a problem? Continue watching the lecture please, it talks about other problems too.

No, it's no problem compared to proving an allmighty allpowerful being exists.
This guy seemingly thinks it takes the same amount of "faith" (lol).
Nah, don't wanna waste my time.
Is there anything serious to expect? Or just another 50minutes of the same fallacies?

But if there is not evolution that means we were created so that proves he exists so it's not a problem.

Related.

Ah, someone else who has show interest in this new game. I'm excited for it.

It's gonna be so cool! ANd it comes out right before my birthday!

Which is on the date of?

Release date is March 26th.

Thanks for that information, and happy birthday to you.

Some good artwork right there.

It's the same the other way around if a religious person tells me that i'm going to hell....

we don't spend our days looking up that stuff. We just say 'you're sinning, you're gonna go to hell'

And that doesn't seem threatening to you?

Because researching things is how we find out what's wrong and what's right.

To show you you're wrong.

I would like to know when the Church denounced science because from my understanding science was backed by the Church in the West during the Medieval Ages which gave rise to the Renaissance age which the Church had back that up too, It is not until the 1940's when the Church started putting its foot down on Science because of some of the products being acquired through it. We can blame that on the philosophies of the time which truly contradicted Church teachings because in the 18th and 19th century all the big philosophers had these "original ideas" and refused to look back to the Greeks and Romans. Again as I said in the original post the Church is pro-science but there are individuals out there who were/are/will be against it.

In my post I was writing as if Thomas Aquinas had seen this and what he would have said. In his opening statements of the Summa Theologica he speaks very highly of science and what it has done for society and still to this day St. Thomas is one of the more influential Catholics and some Protestants read to find answers

**SILENCEnight rolled a random image posted in comment #469594 at Friendly ** NOBODY EXPECTS THE SPANISH INQUISITION




old comment was deleted cause i dont want to start a religious shitstorm

eh it's ok I don't mean to be an asshole about it but I gets on my nerves to hear people talk about Catholics (the Church) being anti-science