Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#116 - anonionbagel (02/09/2013) [-]
Actually, the cells which make up your body stop dividing and functioning, so your atomic makeup would no longer support you. Nothing spiritual happens, your body just no longer works, meaning you are no longer organic matter.
#163 to #116 - TrevorNorris (02/09/2013) [-]
We humans are organic matter, and when we die, we are still organic matter. This **** is basic chemistry. If metal rusts, it is still metal, for there isn't a drastic change in the molecular makeup. Just as when we die, we no longer are living, but it doesn't mean that our bodies morph with various elements and form a new compound....
User avatar #140 to #116 - techketzer (02/09/2013) [-]
"you are no longer organic matter."

"Organic matter (or organic material, natural organic matter) is matter composed of organic compounds that has come from the remains of once-living organisms such as plants and animals and their waste products in the environment."

Get your act together.
User avatar #177 to #140 - anonionbagel (02/09/2013) [-]
Yeah, I noticed that after writing, just ignore that bit after the last comma.
User avatar #128 to #116 - fishtacos (02/09/2013) [-]
Before the ********* happens, let me just go through what it's gonna be about: Dickwad up there will continue to say "you can't prove anything spiritual happens after death" and some other dickwad's gonna keep saying "you can't prove that it doesn't happen so therefore it does.". Nobody's gonna change their opinion, there's gonna be a **** ton of purple lines, and finally one of the dickwads is gonna ragequit and the other dickwad is gonna feel like he proved someone wrong on the internet, and somehow that makes his sad life a little better. End ********* , everybody moves on.
User avatar #129 to #128 - anonionbagel (02/09/2013) [-]
Except I was using facts and evidence, and you're just trying to be as bystander as possible.
#168 to #129 - Deathfyre (02/09/2013) [-]
Incorrect facts, stated badly. Try harder
User avatar #135 to #129 - fishtacos (02/09/2013) [-]
Except you used PHYSICAL facts and evidence, which proves absolutely nothing about the SPIRITUAL self. You'll reply "there's no evidence that there is a spiritual self so it doesn't exist". Just stop. You can't prove it doesn't exist, and I can't prove that it does. Let's both just believe what we want, and we'll find out who's right when we die instead of wasting our lives being dumbasses. Deal?
#142 to #135 - tylosaurus (02/09/2013) [-]
mfw he pulled you into arguing and now you're going to be the dickwad.
#144 to #142 - fishtacos (02/09/2013) [-]
*sigh* Yup, pretty much. Moral of this story: do as I say, not as I do.
User avatar #139 to #135 - anonionbagel (02/09/2013) [-]
You can prove non-existence, it's called a paradox, your spiritual claim would be a repeating infinite. I'm not wasting anything, I just think you'd be a little happier living your life without all that built-up lying to yourself.
User avatar #143 to #139 - fishtacos (02/09/2013) [-]
there is nothing paradoxical about the existence of an afterlife. There are so many things in this life that humanity knows absolutely nothing about. The observable universe, for example, has the size ratio to the unobservable universe as an atom has to Earth. with so much unseen and unknown, an afterlife is easily believable. And maybe it makes you happier, but many people take comfort in the belief that death isn't the end, and lead happier, more productive lives because of it. Inversely, atheists live happy and productive lives too because they want to make their short time on this galactic infinity worthwhile, just like other people who do have religion. My point is this: 1) while you can prove non-existence, you can't prove anything about an afterlife. It's just something that is beyond human knowledge and technology at the moment. 2) People live perfectly happy lives both with and without religion, so why fix something that isn't broken, and 3) Nobody's opinion is going to change over an internet argument, so stop trying and be a little more tolerant.
User avatar #176 to #143 - anonionbagel (02/09/2013) [-]
It is easily an infinite paradox, the entirety of a concept of a deity being and a place in which all HUMAN desires are fulfilled would be against all scientific progress we have made today, it would be a conflicting and infinitude, making it paradoxical. But, I'd rather not ruin my Saturday arguing.
User avatar #199 to #176 - fishtacos (02/11/2013) [-]
How would it be against all scientific progress? How would it be conflicting with any of our factual knowledge in any way? You're making some pretty big jumps in logic. If anything, the amazing discoveries we've made in the past 100 years alone only proves that anything is possible, even an afterlife.
#123 to #116 - sirblank (02/09/2013) [-]
And your loved ones see your internet history...
And your loved ones see your internet history...
User avatar #127 to #123 - anonionbagel (02/09/2013) [-]
Not exactly sure how that even remotely relates to what I said...
User avatar #171 to #127 - brnoflynn (02/09/2013) [-]
Son can i just point out you lost any and every intelligent argument when you said we are no longer organic matter when we die.
#153 to #127 - twssc (02/09/2013) [-]
What he said
 Friends (0)