| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
#39 - chrolt ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
This is all fake, notice how there was no swearing in the post. Clearly we can't trust it.
This is all fake, notice how there was no swearing in the post. Clearly we can't trust it.
#60 to #39 - wakaflockfloka (02/02/2013) [-]
Well you fuck there was no swearing in yours either how can we trust you?
#64 to #60 - N. Korean citizen (02/02/2013) [-]
Well cum munching titty dumpers, you're right. You solved the most fucking proplexing problem in the universe and the president of Earth wants to give you the "Motherfucking Genius" Award!
User avatar #62 to #60 - chrolt ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
Fuck you. Is that better?
#81 to #62 - wakaflockfloka (02/02/2013) [-]
Much Fucking better.
#53 to #39 - N. Korean citizen (02/02/2013) [-]
but... if you say that you can't trust it because there is no swearing in it, aren't already trusting in it, considering that that is its message?
And now you just created a loophole in my brain you fucking cocksucker.
User avatar #51 to #39 - manicekman (02/02/2013) [-]
Fuck you dipshit cocksucker, the post is motherfucking legit you cunt.
User avatar #44 to #39 - fitemeirl (02/02/2013) [-]
But if it's fake it doesn't need swearing to be true.
User avatar #50 to #44 - eccleston (02/02/2013) [-]
But if it were true, wouldn't it be meesing swearing?
User avatar #52 to #50 - eccleston (02/02/2013) [-]
*missing.

Fuck, I shouldn't be in front of my computer before drinking my morning coffee.
#45 to #44 - chrolt ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
By the gods, you're right!
 Friends (0)