Star Wars. . I WILL DIRECT STAR WARS EPISODE VII.. Deliver on my Samurai Jack movie first you prick.
x
Click to expand

Comments(164):

[ 164 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#9 - dwarfman (02/01/2013) [-]
Deliver on my Samurai Jack movie first you prick.
#70 to #39 - evenx (02/02/2013) [-]
Oh you!
User avatar #1 - huntergriff ONLINE (02/01/2013) [-]
the **** is that on the computer screen? it looks like a predator without dreadlocks
#155 to #1 - fizzor (02/02/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#4 to #3 - huntergriff ONLINE (02/01/2013) [-]
#32 - Soilwork (02/02/2013) [-]
picture of the cast
#62 to #32 - vanishingpoint (02/02/2013) [-]
Chewy...I AM your father
#50 to #32 - kevlarx (02/02/2013) [-]
yoda stich is ******* awesome
#107 - feelythefeel ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
Am I the only one that thinks that the prequels get a lot more hate than they deserve? I know they're not as good as the originals, but I think they're fine on their own merits.
#108 to #107 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
ur retarted.
#109 to #108 - feelythefeel ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
I wasn't aware of that. You learn something every day, I guess.
User avatar #128 to #108 - calawesome (02/02/2013) [-]
So is your spelling.
#135 to #128 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
you're*
User avatar #138 to #135 - calawesome (02/02/2013) [-]
No it's your. You sir, are retarded.
#181 to #138 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
retarted*
User avatar #183 to #181 - calawesome (02/03/2013) [-]
seriously, no one can be that stupid.
#185 to #183 - anon (02/04/2013) [-]
noone*
User avatar #148 to #107 - Gandalfthewhite (02/02/2013) [-]
personally i actually really enjoy them. the only thing i don't really like about them is the dude who played Anakin was a terrible actor, but then again i can't really imagine anyone else playing him
#119 to #107 - rawesome (02/02/2013) [-]
The problem with starwars episode 1-3 is that they were made for kids wich pissed off a lot of the people who were kids when episode 4-6 came out.

People were expecting George Lucas to make a movie for the classic starwars fans but instead they ended up with this speech impaired ************ .

That also explains why disney has been having such a hard time finding a director, because either you make a movie for the kids or you make a commercial flop that the old school fans will enjoy.
#18 - Keithazoid (02/02/2013) [-]
Okay seriously, what was so bad about the new Star Trek... I thought it was ******* awesome
#26 to #18 - zukowashere (02/02/2013) [-]
It was because they were too lazy to get their facts straight, so they stuck the movie in an alternate universe so there'd be no plot-holes.
It was because they were too lazy to get their facts straight, so they stuck the movie in an alternate universe so there'd be no plot-holes.
+5
#43 to #26 - moshpittmatt **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #33 to #26 - Mr Ronok (02/02/2013) [-]
theyd better not do that to star wars
User avatar #31 to #26 - vanoreo (02/02/2013) [-]
When you think about it, there are the massive Star Trek faggots who would go through and flip **** over the tiniest of flaws if they had it in the "real" universe.

Then again I have never seen any Star Trek
#36 to #18 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
Anything "non-canon" is heavily frowned upon.
Alternate reality is a pretty cheesy excuse.

It's like spending decades with a show, only to be told none of that existed. 80 or so episodes, a couple of movies, and poof, none of that happened.

It's not a big deal to me, but obviously the die-hard fans **** themselves.
#56 to #36 - UnoSkullmanx ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
So basically, the movie sucks if you're a fanboy? Gotcha.
User avatar #37 to #18 - taintedangel (02/02/2013) [-]
Cus fans bitch at any sort of change from an established medium or storyline.

Examples:
>the new Dvil May Cry
>MegaMan Battle Network
>basically any reboot (good or bad)
#113 to #37 - huntergriff ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
Don't forget any Halo game...seriously you have no idea how many rustled jimmies there were right after halo 4 was announced.

pic unrelated.
User avatar #143 to #113 - steedawwg **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
Halo 4 was ******* awesome, 343 did a great job IMO.
User avatar #175 to #143 - huntergriff ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
I'm not saying it wasn't...i'm saying there was a massive ********* that occured prior to the release of the game that intensified in the days before the game came out.
User avatar #176 to #175 - steedawwg **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
Oh don't get me wrong, I know you're not. I'm just saying that is was awesome :)
User avatar #177 to #176 - huntergriff ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
Indeed, by the way, have they said when the title update is supposed to occur? And when the file share is supposed to be up?
User avatar #178 to #177 - steedawwg **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
File share is as we speak my friend, so I think that update happened recently :']
User avatar #179 to #178 - huntergriff ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
Ah, good.
User avatar #20 to #18 - azraelthemage (02/02/2013) [-]
Fanboys just can't get over the fact that someone made a decent Star Trek film in years, and will continue to do so with Into Darkness.
#22 to #20 - mitchimusk (02/02/2013) [-]
I'm just excited to see Benedict Cumberbatch play Kahn
#24 to #22 - azraelthemage (02/02/2013) [-]
As far as Benedict Cumberbatch goes, I can't wait to see him as a ******* DRAGON!!!!
#47 to #22 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
He's not playing Kahn, ********** .
#172 to #47 - mitchimusk (02/02/2013) [-]
Since you know so much, I'm surprised you didn't catch my spelling mistake. It's KHAN, **********
User avatar #25 to #22 - azraelthemage (02/02/2013) [-]
And wait, he's gonna be Kahn? I thought he was supposed to be one of his followers.
#171 to #25 - mitchimusk (02/02/2013) [-]
You're right. I saw on IMDB that he was playing Khan but it said "rumored" and I looked it up and it said that he isn't. My mistake
#15 - elmoose **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
User avatar #19 to #15 - azraelthemage (02/02/2013) [-]
Oh please god, make Abrams get rid of the lens flare just this once.
User avatar #29 to #19 - fxremastered (02/02/2013) [-]
You've never seen any of his other works have you? That was the only one with lens flares up the ass.
User avatar #30 to #29 - azraelthemage (02/02/2013) [-]
His other movies do have lens flares, but they weren't as bad. Still bothers me though.
User avatar #116 to #30 - huntergriff ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
i don't remember cloverfield having lens flare...or lost...or alias...
#72 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
This image has expired
my opinion: i didnt mind the prequels and i didnt think Jar jar was that annoying
User avatar #80 to #72 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/02/2013) [-]
Are you kidding me, have you ever seen THIS video:
/watch?v=FxKtZmQgxrI

It's 4 hours worth of video reviews of the prequels and explains why the movies suck
User avatar #82 to #80 - Crusader (02/02/2013) [-]
Lemme guess
It's biggest gripes are
Too much CGI
Jar Jar
Based to much of fight scenes
#121 to #82 - samael (02/02/2013) [-]
You forgot that stupid pseudo-biological explanation for the force that ruined the mystery around it.
User avatar #123 to #121 - Crusader (02/02/2013) [-]
That was supposed to be in the original trilogy.
Obi-Wan was supposed to be doing biological research to find a way to to somehow get Force Ghosts bodies' back.
But then they figured the hermit route was going to be better, but Lucas knew that they were going to have that from the beginning, he spent years creating lore behind it all.
User avatar #137 to #123 - thatguywhohasbacon (02/02/2013) [-]
I still think it sound better as a religion.
User avatar #85 to #82 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/02/2013) [-]
Nope they make a million good points with why the movie makes no sense.
#127 to #85 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
what's this? a work of fiction not making any sense? well **** , my whole life has been a lie then hasn't it?


gtfo
User avatar #98 to #80 - madjackwack (02/02/2013) [-]
dude, i don't think you understand.

people like the movie, or dislike it because it's OPINION. people who make videos like that are ******* retarded, it's like they're not satisfied with the fact that people enjoy the movie, it's like if someone went round town stopping every person to explain why pop music is crap, but no matter how many hours you spend explaining your point, they will just turn round and say "ok, well i still like it." Opinion is not fact. i like the prequels because they were brutal, had epic as **** scenes, loved the character progression and relevance to the original trilogy.
#84 to #80 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
This image has expired
User avatar #88 to #84 - hawaiianhappysauce (02/02/2013) [-]
Seriously watch the video.
User avatar #87 to #80 - thepandaking (02/02/2013) [-]
I honestly thought those videos were really funny in a dark way. but that's just me.
#104 to #103 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
This image has expired
ok
#89 to #72 - csmithyo (02/02/2013) [-]
let us date if you are male
let us date if you are male
User avatar #91 to #89 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
not sure if serious
User avatar #184 to #91 - csmithyo (02/03/2013) [-]
love it jar jar was one of my favs as a little girl
User avatar #186 to #184 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/04/2013) [-]
i have a jar jar binks piggy bank
User avatar #187 to #186 - csmithyo (02/04/2013) [-]
YUUUUUUUS
User avatar #188 to #187 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/05/2013) [-]
and a jar jar coffee thermis
#189 to #188 - csmithyo (02/05/2013) [-]
soul mates, its like youre talking dirty haha
soul mates, its like youre talking dirty haha
User avatar #190 to #189 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/05/2013) [-]
messa so happy to speaking to you
#192 to #191 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
my wallpaper :3
#194 to #193 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/05/2013) [-]
This image has expired
im sorta chubby
User avatar #195 to #194 - csmithyo (02/05/2013) [-]
now the internet knows your face
User avatar #196 to #195 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/05/2013) [-]
so ?
User avatar #197 to #196 - csmithyo (02/05/2013) [-]
valid point, also my pic is me, and im fairly sure i look older than you...hawks
User avatar #198 to #197 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/05/2013) [-]
im 20 turning 21 in june
User avatar #199 to #198 - csmithyo (02/05/2013) [-]
well then i was mistaken
User avatar #200 to #199 - greenzeopoweranger **User deleted account** (02/05/2013) [-]
its ok ^^
#73 to #72 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
k
#78 to #72 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
I like the prequels better (especially revenge of the sith)
User avatar #75 to #72 - thepandaking (02/02/2013) [-]
I didn't mind the prequels either... but... MEESA HATE HOW HARD MASTA JAR JAR CHARACTER TRIED TO PULL OFF THE COMIC RELIEFSA!!!

I just wanted to do a jar jar accent in type.
User avatar #81 to #75 - Crusader (02/02/2013) [-]
i read it in his voice
User avatar #86 to #81 - thepandaking (02/02/2013) [-]
as you should have :p
#131 - SlipknotNine (02/02/2013) [-]
You will direct Star Wars Episode VII
User avatar #38 - gammajk ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
Hey.
Even if abrams sucks cock with star wars
at least it isn't george lucas
#142 - mallet (02/02/2013) [-]
People confuse me...

>call haters of the new Star Trek movie "fanboy faggots" for disliking a movie drastically different from past Star Trek fare.

>threaten to stab mickey mouse in the throat if they even think about trying anything different with the new Star Wars movies.
User avatar #168 to #142 - redneckhokage (02/02/2013) [-]
because Star Wars and Star Trek has a whole different world of fans to each
#140 - padrerebelscumole (02/02/2013) [-]
>ITT people picking movies to be directed instead of the Star Wars
>ITT people picking movies to be directed instead of the Star Wars
#133 - bakakinji (02/02/2013) [-]
Like many on here have said, the sequels weren't so bad if you didn't compare them to the older ones. In my honest opinion, Episode 1 was pretty bad ass for the most part. I mean, pod racers, droids, princesses, and best of all, dual lightsabers. Episode II bored me for the most part, but it did have its share of badass parts. Episode III definitely could have been better, but the fighting scenes were pretty cool, and I love how the campaign in Battlefront II uses Episode III. Let's all be honest here, Disney has done wonders with some franchises, so stop bitching just because Disney is known for child-friendly cartoons. The Avengers was pretty much Disney, and they did a great job with that! Oh, and Kingdom Hearts, Pirates of the Caribbean, every single movie that has the Touchstone Pictures label on it, and pretty much every Marvel movie that will come out in the near future.
User avatar #152 to #133 - themongoose (02/02/2013) [-]
Forgot to mention that Pulp Fiction was also a Disney movie...you may be a bit too young for that one though.
User avatar #134 to #133 - thatguywhohasbacon (02/02/2013) [-]
As long as they drop the midichlorian ******** and don't pull out another jar-jar binks I'll be pretty happy with whatever they do.
User avatar #151 to #133 - themongoose (02/02/2013) [-]
So...the atrocious acting didn't get to you at all? Hayden Christensen is a male Kristin Stewart. He's the same in EVERY movie. Liam Neeson and Ewan McGregor were barely even decent, and Natalie Portman was terrible as well. Chalk it up to bad directing and Lucas having his hand in it too much, but still, awful movies. (And I'm not saying the original movies were good either. Mark Hammill was a joke too. Good thing he stuck with voice acting. The only reason they were "good" is because they were groundbreaking in the special effects - like Avatar - and sci-fi story world. Not because they are good movies).

Thumb however you people like. I am a hardcore fanboy, but I prefer the books over the movies. I think the next three will be the best three now that Lucas is just a "consultant."
User avatar #166 to #151 - bakakinji (02/02/2013) [-]
You do bring up some good points; however, I couldn't care less about the acting. Personally, all I wanted to do was point out that the idea of new Star Wars movies aren't as bad as the mainstream media is saying. I mean, we have Disney, who are known for making children movies but are overlooked for the other things they do like Pulp Fiction (as you stated in #152), J.J. Abrams who directed the Star Trek movie which they really did a great job on, and an extremely popular series that needed the last three movies because it's supposed to work somewhat like a three-part play.
User avatar #2 - nyj (02/01/2013) [-]
Ah, the power of money.
User avatar #92 - maidenmk (02/02/2013) [-]
"I will direct Star Wars Episode VII....today!
#35 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
Ehehemm ehehemem Kingdom Hearts 3
#124 - maulingo **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
I was a very young kid when the first 3 movies came out. A teenager when the Phantom Menace came out. IMO... I got my share of epic star wars experience when I was a kid. Why is it so bad if Disney can make another 2-3 generations feel the same epic star wars experience? How much would it rock to be able to talk to your kid about star wars **** . I mean... imagine if daddy can actually understand all the stuff you and your friends talk about? Superdad galore. Building model Tie fighters together and **** ... Hell.. I hope disney makes a movie every year for the rest of for ever.
0
#154 to #124 - newfiefromhell **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #159 to #124 - atzekatze (02/02/2013) [-]
******** .. Episode IV came out in 1977 and Phantom Menace in 1999, there is no possible way for you be at kid in 1977 and a teenager in 1999...
#161 to #159 - maulingo **User deleted account** (02/02/2013) [-]
It took a long time for me to see the first movie (I live in Denmark) (For you in the US it is a state in the country named Europe). I saw it for the first time on VHS with the same friend I went to see Phantom Menace with. So when I said "the first movies came out" I was lying out of my ass... I wasn't born untill 83. But the message in my argument stays the same.
User avatar #173 to #161 - atzekatze (02/02/2013) [-]
OK hej. Jeg er også dansker så der er ingen grund til at være flabet om det.
Min historie om Star Wars er den samme som din. ses
User avatar #54 - heretofuckshitup ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
The Disney Corporation
is probably the only thing that can legitimately buy people.
Disney is modern slavery and the best part is the slaves are celebrities
-1
#63 to #54 - apatheticdemon **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #64 to #63 - heretofuckshitup ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
Pixar has been disney's bitch for a long time. The only time Pixar was alpha was when they're contract ran up and they threatened to leave but came crawling back

Avenger was acquired post filming

Disney animator are like chinese sweatshop workers

John Carter's movie rights has been owned by disney practically since the book came out and given that Taylor Kitsch has been known for his flops recently this is his steady meal ticket should Disney decide to throw up more sequels.

I didn't see Timothy Green so you win there though
+1
#66 to #64 - apatheticdemon **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #180 to #64 - pixar (02/02/2013) [-]
Im no ones bitch
User avatar #58 to #54 - TigerShark ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
seriously... slaves? that's a bit over dramatic considering they get paid a *******
User avatar #60 to #58 - heretofuckshitup ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
C'mon lets be real here do they get money yeah sure. But can they ever truly leave the disney branch. CAn you truly see Miley Cyrus as something other than Hannah Montana or Zac Efron as much more than high school musical. I mean yeah they've done more but disney has a way of making them their whipping toys. I would compare it to selling your soul to the devil but realistically the devil can't do it as well as Disney
#65 to #60 - evenx (02/02/2013) [-]
Oh sure, because miley cyrus and zac effron would SURELY have gotten famous and successful without disneys help. Yeah.... that'd be the day
User avatar #69 to #65 - heretofuckshitup ONLINE (02/02/2013) [-]
but thats what i'm saying. why you gotta call me an r-tard if you just agreed with me
#71 to #69 - evenx (02/02/2013) [-]
sorry, i was looking up garrison reaction photo's, saw this one, and wanted to post it. I really just think that its not really like they are whipping toys or anything, they are pretty much set for life after about a year or two of touring and advertising.
#156 to #60 - anon (02/02/2013) [-]
No, I don't think that's very accurate. Remember, the people Disney employ for these tasks have a passion for their work. That's how they're able to get there in the first place. Imagine if you found a career that makes use of your talents (talents you enjoy), and someone came along to say, "Hey, we think you're the best person for this project of ours. We're prepared to pay you millions if you're up for it."
Nothing at all like slavery, or selling one's soul. If someone were dragged into Disney's project's kicking and screaming (quite literally), then there'd be something horrid about it.
User avatar #59 to #58 - iaminfactawizard (02/02/2013) [-]
They are found at a young age, plucked from society and given a starring role in a sitcom for a few years. Then, a band and exile.
User avatar #68 to #59 - evenx (02/02/2013) [-]
I'd trade places with them, whore myself out to advertise for companies for ********* of cash. Then retire and never do anything remotely interesting so the paparazzi wouldnt follow me.
User avatar #141 to #68 - paparazzi (02/02/2013) [-]
im not gonna follow you :)
User avatar #28 - mrgoodbunny (02/02/2013) [-]
I hope he takes his lens flares to starwars as well.
#160 - tuckthisphit (02/02/2013) [-]
I never liked Star Wars.
#167 to #160 - lemonpledge (02/02/2013) [-]
blasphemy!
[ 164 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)