Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#17 - derpyhuman
Reply +22
(02/01/2013) [-]
That's a rectangle.
#85 to #17 - viicstaar
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
A square is a type of rectangle.
#46 to #17 - tornwingsofangels
Reply -1
(02/01/2013) [-]
so we're fighting over quadrilaterals now?
#34 to #17 - CapnInterwebz
Reply +2
(02/01/2013) [-]
A square is a type of rectangle
#36 to #34 - hecticsilence
Reply +8
(02/01/2013) [-]
But not every rectangle is a square ya ****
#71 to #36 - habigan
Reply -1
(02/01/2013) [-]
Shouldn't it technically be called a rhomboid or rhombus?
#102 to #71 - hecticsilence
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
I wasn't commenting on the shape of the root, I honestly couldn't care less, I was just correcting the other guy.
#105 to #102 - habigan
Reply -1
(02/02/2013) [-]
Sorry, I was just trying to add some mother ******* intelligence to a pointless conversation
#107 to #105 - hecticsilence
Reply 0
(02/02/2013) [-]
Oh everyone watch out! Einstein is here to add some "mother ******* intelligence." It's funny junk, you don't need to be the smart guy.
#47 to #36 - crazyoljew
Reply -2
(02/01/2013) [-]
Jumping on the bandwagon is fun
#56 to #47 - hecticsilence
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
It's just continuing the joke, it's not a bandwagon thing.
#24 to #17 - merrymarvelite
Reply +9
(02/01/2013) [-]
If you look closely, it seems not all angles are 90 degrees.   
   
Furthermore, while the top and bottom sides appear parallel, the right side does not appear to be parallel to the left.   
   
Ergo, this is a trapezoid at best.   
   
(Possibly a parallelogram if the right and left sides are indeed parallel.)
If you look closely, it seems not all angles are 90 degrees.

Furthermore, while the top and bottom sides appear parallel, the right side does not appear to be parallel to the left.

Ergo, this is a trapezoid at best.

(Possibly a parallelogram if the right and left sides are indeed parallel.)
#40 to #24 - derpyhuman
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
Comment Picture
#20 to #17 - cannabinoid
Reply 0
(02/01/2013) [-]
not exactly, more of a rhombus root