| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#188 to #104
-
biddo (02/01/2013) [-]
i agree. she pretty dont get me wrong but look around at everyday people and doll them up in your head (makeup, dress, hair) and youll see that watson is just a normal chick. and not as hot as most "normal" people.
inb4 red thumbs
inb4 opinion on funnyjunk
inb4 fag
inb4 red thumbs
inb4 opinion on funnyjunk
inb4 fag
#184 to #111
-
Sethorein (02/01/2013) [-]
calling emma watson hot isn't a bandwagon... saying every person on youtube should let's play the stupid surgeon simulator is a bandwagon.
Emma watson has traits that are socially deemed sexually appealing to the largest common denominator. She's thin, has a chest that is not large, but not flat, has bright eyes and straight hair of fine texture. Her face has remarkable symmetry, not to mention she (or whoever dresses her) has impeccable fashion sense.
I could go on but I hope you understand what I'm trying to say here. While YOU may deviate from the norm, that does not automatically make the norm a bandwagon. That is unless you consider all instances where the topic under scrutiny lands right at the top of a standard deviation to be a bandwagon effect. Then by your definition this IS a case of bandwagoning, but that does not make the bandwagon any less legitimate...
Normally when I think bandwagon there's an inherent negative connotation... like the object in question being bandwagoned does not deserve the amount of attention that it receives...
Emma watson has traits that are socially deemed sexually appealing to the largest common denominator. She's thin, has a chest that is not large, but not flat, has bright eyes and straight hair of fine texture. Her face has remarkable symmetry, not to mention she (or whoever dresses her) has impeccable fashion sense.
I could go on but I hope you understand what I'm trying to say here. While YOU may deviate from the norm, that does not automatically make the norm a bandwagon. That is unless you consider all instances where the topic under scrutiny lands right at the top of a standard deviation to be a bandwagon effect. Then by your definition this IS a case of bandwagoning, but that does not make the bandwagon any less legitimate...
Normally when I think bandwagon there's an inherent negative connotation... like the object in question being bandwagoned does not deserve the amount of attention that it receives...