Right wing reason #373. Not wanting to make any political statements, just thought the scenario with that assumption was funny. Not trying to start an argument
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

Right wing reason #373

Not wanting to make any political statements, just thought the scenario with that assumption was funny. Not trying to start an argument on whether or not that assumption is accurate or correct.

+1442
Views: 42326
Favorited: 72
Submitted: 01/28/2013
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to brigettasandra E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(155):

[ 155 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Anonymous commenting is allowed
User avatar #147 - kingmarston (01/29/2013) [-]
I honestly don't see what was wrong with don't ask don't tell. That stuff doesn't need to be mentioned on the battlefield.
#156 to #147 - harleyzone (01/29/2013) [-]
it was because if someone outed you you could get dishonorably discharged for being gay. but I agree, keep your intimate stuff like that under wraps, you really shouldn't have relations or anything with other enlisted people, from what I've been told it's always a bad idea
#142 - pagastan (01/29/2013) [-]
...but you need two wings to fly (pic barely related)
User avatar #158 to #142 - gmarrox (01/29/2013) [-]
Anybody uh



Anybody got this without the bird?
#138 - wyldek ONLINE (01/29/2013) [-]
There is a very simple reason gays shouldn't be in combat and it's the same reason women shouldn't be in combat.

Any sexual relationship in a combat situation just RUINS discipline. That's it. No other reason.
#155 to #138 - harleyzone (01/29/2013) [-]
I kind of agree, they should be allowed, but I feel that troupes shouldn't be coed, a male troupe or female troupe, homosexuality really complicates things, I know when my dad was enlisted there was a ********* of "sexual harassment" charges whenever a woman disagreed with a male ranked higher than her (this was when coed ships were just starting) and it still goes on, most enlisted men avoided coed ships like grim death. I personally think that that should be up to the soldiers alone, let them vote on it, I'm not the one fighting, so why should I have a say in how they run themselves? even if I pay taxes, I'm still not the one fighting, let the people vote on things like their budgets (within reason) but how they're run should be their deal.
User avatar #150 to #138 - hadzibg (01/29/2013) [-]
Well of course it ruins discipline. For the same reason women never follow their men into war. What sexually satisfied man would want to fight? When you have sex regularly, it is much easier to remain calm, passive, watchful. War needs men full of aggression, men full of anger. War needs effective killing machines. The only way for men to be so aggressive is to remain sexually frustrated, it's actually a very clever method for keeping a war-efficient army.
User avatar #136 - themaaster (01/29/2013) [-]
I'm getting real tired of this Left wing, Right wing ******** . All it does is divide people and cause discourse. Honestly if we didn't do all of this grouping and other ******** we might be able to come up with a ******* result.
#152 to #136 - wheresthefudge (01/29/2013) [-]
Sooo... discourse is a bad thing now?
#157 to #152 - harleyzone (01/29/2013) [-]
I think he means discord?
User avatar #160 to #157 - themaaster (01/29/2013) [-]
Yeah that one. Thanks for correcting me.
#161 to #160 - harleyzone (01/29/2013) [-]
Nein problem
#148 to #136 - vonspyder (01/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
Word my brother.
#153 to #148 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
YAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAYAY NO TO STATISM, YES TO WEEEEEED

4/20
#154 to #153 - vonspyder (01/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
I just felt this country needed a Big Johnson instead of the usual pricks we get in the white house.
-3
#135 - anonymous Comment deleted by brigettasandra [-]
#149 to #135 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
heello i am reddit ****** and i just want to say that i did le math and you are = 2 bigot

have fun with ur low iq lol, conservatives r low in da congitive ability
User avatar #146 to #135 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
i cnt tell if tr00l or just stoopid...
User avatar #145 to #135 - piekiller (01/29/2013) [-]
K
User avatar #151 to #145 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
K
K
K

L000000000000000000000000L

racism isn't funny, go bck 2 stfrnt
-1
#144 to #135 - byposted Comment deleted by brigettasandra [-]
User avatar #143 to #135 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
OMG TRIGGER WARNING I CANNOT BELEVE PREJUDICED PPL LIKE U EXIST IN THE 21ST CENTURY OMG OMG OMG

im def bloggin about this on my tumblr lter/./

#141 to #135 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
omg u so bigoted lol, (i dont know what dat werd even meen)

get ova it, society evolvs #SWAG #OBAMA #MARX #REDDIT #LGBQFDNKT PRIDE

#134 - capnwetnipples (01/29/2013) [-]
This image has expired
gay people
User avatar #125 - philliyoMLB (01/29/2013) [-]
I don't believe the right does not want gays in the military, they just don't want gays to be openly gay in the military.
#122 - darkjustifier (01/29/2013) [-]
Someone hasn't watched the show shameless.
User avatar #116 - thefurie (01/29/2013) [-]
Simple, other armies employ chicks and our current forces are useless
User avatar #131 to #123 - thefurie (01/29/2013) [-]
that's great for when i go cry for making the comment.
User avatar #113 - badsamaritan (01/29/2013) [-]
The only things republicans ever told me about the hole Anti-gay in war stuff is that basically we are fighting cultures that kill people just for being accused gay. They do that **** right on the spot too..
Basically its more of a protection issue. in there eyes
User avatar #128 to #113 - demandsgayversion (01/29/2013) [-]
I like this.
User avatar #114 to #113 - badsamaritan (01/29/2013) [-]
their*
#111 - deathrinder (01/29/2013) [-]
By god hes right.
#110 - sirgawain (01/29/2013) [-]
Ignoring the description, this is not how all right-wing people view this issue. It's just a stereotype, just like the one this cartoon claims right-wingers have against gays.   
GIF because Carlton.
Ignoring the description, this is not how all right-wing people view this issue. It's just a stereotype, just like the one this cartoon claims right-wingers have against gays.
GIF because Carlton.
User avatar #130 to #110 - brettd (01/29/2013) [-]
I am a conservative that is all for gay marriage and gay members of the military.
User avatar #109 - hydraetis (01/29/2013) [-]
That was good.
#102 - Kellanved (01/29/2013) [-]
So much butthurt in the comments....
User avatar #140 to #102 - rokkarokkaali (01/29/2013) [-]
Everyone in the comments must be gay. Geddit?
User avatar #93 - mondominiman (01/29/2013) [-]
I wonder if somewhere in a war some soldier copped a feel from a dead women soldier.
User avatar #98 to #96 - bokkos (01/29/2013) [-]
They're*

Oh my god I'm an idiot
User avatar #85 - anonythegame (01/29/2013) [-]
if the men look anything at all like the women,this won't be a problem
#81 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
gays were always allowed in the military. It just was that open-gays, wanting attention and being a distraction, were barred from entry. If you've ever met an openly gay person, they are usually attention whores.

You, as a ****** , could enlist as long as you kept your sexual orientation to yourself. What, do you want to ********* in the barracks or something?
#117 to #81 - anonymous (01/29/2013) [-]
What the **** did you just ******* say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secret raids on Al-Quaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. I am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the **** out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my ******* words. You think you can get away with saying that **** to me over the Internet? Think again, ****** . As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're ******* dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent, you little **** . If only you could have known what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your ******* tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will **** fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're ******* dead, kiddo.
0
#84 to #81 - zambisback **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #87 to #84 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
You would have no reason to openly classify yourself as "homosexual" unless you want attention and/or a sexual partner.

The "gay ban" was not affecting anyone so long as they kept their dicks in their pants; not in the butthole of their comrades.
#100 to #87 - ykjr (01/29/2013) [-]
What about a person that has a long time partner that isn't in the military?

If that person were to be seen with their partner they would have been kicked out of the military even though they never brought it up for "attention" as you put it. Also they would have never been allowed to take their partner to any military ceremonies.
User avatar #108 to #100 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
I love how you try to portray a loving, gay couple who have been together and have an exclusive, caring relationship. Such a thing is blasphemy against the family unit, for it is such a bended depiction of reality.

www.amazon.com/The-Male-Couple-Relationships-Develop/dp/0135475635

In The Male Couple, authors David P. McWhirter and Andrew M. Mattison reported that in a study of a hundred-fifty-six males in homosexual relationships lasting from one to thirty-seven years,

Only seven couples have a totally exclusive sexual relationship, and these men all have been together for less than five years. Stated another way, all couples with a relationship lasting more than five years have incorporated some provision for outside sexual activity in their relationships.


#115 to #108 - ykjr (01/29/2013) [-]
Oh, you're just a bigot. I'm just not going to waste my time talking with someone who is going to be on the wrong side of history and a disgrace to future generations.
User avatar #121 to #115 - bokkos (01/29/2013) [-]
Don't bother, obvious troll is obvious.
#119 to #115 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
big·ot

(adjective) a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

prej·u·dice

(noun) an unfavorable opinion or feeling formed beforehand or without knowledge, thought, or reason.

I wonder who these words apply to in this conversation. The one who is babbling tumblr-tier rhetoric on the "patriarchy" and "homosexual oppression" or the one who responded by linking a respected study, by homosexuals of all people!
User avatar #126 to #119 - bokkos (01/29/2013) [-]
I'm so glad you posted that picture! I present to you:
Hodson, G., & Busseri, M.A. (2012). Bright minds and dark attitudes: Lower cognitive ability predicts greater prejudice through right-wing ideology and low intergroup contact. Psychological Science, 23, 187-195 .

I'll sum it up for you: Basically, they have proven beyond a shadow of a doubt that conservative views, bigotry (a word you should be oh so familiar with) , and racism stem from low intelligence and low cognitive ability.
#127 to #126 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
Wait a minute...

A leftist is lecturing me on Intelligence Quotient. I thought all of you enlightened ones dismissed IQ as a tool of the evil White man to oppress blacks and promote "pseudo-science," or portraying differences between the races.

I link you to a study by Professor J. Philippe Rushton:

You need to login to view this link
User avatar #90 to #87 - bokkos (01/29/2013) [-]
Right, so explain why gay men have to keep it in their pants, but female soldiers can be raped and their attacker not receive more than a slap on the wrist?
Face it; It's homophobia and patriarchy more than anything.
User avatar #104 to #90 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
So since a few men rape women it's okay for homosexuals to partake in mass-orgies while in arms?

Women, in the military, are raped at the highest levels anywhere. You have a bunch of men who haven't had sex in months... as they see women, they get naturally tempted. Most do not act on their impulses. The US military has rape as a violation of their code, and it's illegal too.

As the Red Army advanced West in Europe (hello), hundreds of thousands of women were raped; the biggest mass-rape in recorded history. Not only Germans were raped, but Polish, Russians, everyone!

This is why allowing women as combat soldiers can draw a big problem. If women are captured by a hostile force, they will be treated as booty.

And what's this babble on the patriarchy? Men have been leaders of the nation since the beginning of recorded history, in the civilized world.
#118 to #104 - bokkos (01/29/2013) [-]
... Not sure if retarded, or just trolling.
User avatar #124 to #118 - byposted (01/29/2013) [-]
big·ot

(adjective) a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices

I wrote nothing factually incorrect on rape of women in the military, the mass-rape of WWII, and the fallacy of your association between some women getting raped in the military and homosexuals of having to, "keep (their penis') in their pants'"
#103 to #90 - anonymous (01/29/2013) [-]
Seriously shut your mouth, I surely hope women aren't being raped by other male soldiers and I'm sure they'd get a bit more if they did. Why is it right to put straight males in the position of having to shower, sleep, and change with other men who would possibly be ogling them, isn't this a bit of a case of reverse phobia? There was a reason for dont ask dont tell, that **** don't belong in the military... maybe the navy... anyway though it's seriously some ******** that people feel this fire inside them that demands their sexual preference be known and loud. I don't run around screaming I'm straight when I join the military. We were brothers in arms, not brothers in hands. Be gay, just don't let it define you.
User avatar #120 to #103 - bokkos (01/29/2013) [-]
Silly anon, you have no power here.
User avatar #80 - reican (01/29/2013) [-]
In other words, if a super hot girl is an enemy sniper, all countersnipers would be killed as they couldn't shoot her for the same reasons
0
#79 - skinless has deleted their comment [-]
#75 - anonymous (01/29/2013) [-]
"accurate or correct"
you sir, have earned a thumb.
[ 155 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)