Useless as shit.

I'd like to see you punch a block of bone.

please not my bones, i am fragile

In all honesty, saying that bones are 5 times stronger than almost any object seems retarded, not everyone is a Martial Artist

Yeah, bone strength varies alot.

i finally get to use this...

density not weight

My boner is stronger than steel.

I punched a wall and broke my hand once



Either there's some bullshit going on or my years of fapping have paid off splendidly

No you just haven't drank enough milk.

Ya bitch ass pussy niggah

A block of steel isn't exactly the same comparison as a few bones in the fingers.

You are not smart,

I'd like to see you punch a block of bone.

Simple because..

where the fuck would you find that?

It really depends on the person, but an average human's femur is stronger than concrete, steel, etc. etc.

www.answerbag.com/q_view/20953

http://www.livescience.com/6040-brute-force-humans-punch.html

www.youtube.com/watch?v=FlATeMqTH2g

http://www.blurtit.com/q5542390.html

blog.mineralifeonline.com/bones-are-stronger-than-steel/

I do not mean any disrespect against you, but for future reference, when engaging in a debate, it's best to bring up proof of why YOUR side is correct, rather than call the other side false and demand they give more proof

I'm sorry, are you saying that I'm incorrect even after providing 5 links of proof that I'm not?

I understand you're a different person, but I seriously hope you were joking or being sarcastic, as believing that is a terrible thing and would make you lose in nearly every case of law and debate

Sometimes I take the old cum from under my foreskin and put it in the butter container.

That's... insightful...

why do you store cum under your foreskin?

Bones strength relative to density

Absolutely what i was thinking

Got the links for you

you're still comparing apples to nazi oranges, had your statment been phrased correctly i may not have disagreed as much. And material properties have a huge amount of weight in the subject, steel's ability to be isotripic is HUGE. Also if were bringing education into the matter, I am a civil engineer with a focus in structures. So i happen to know quite a large amount about steel. 9/10 people that make these posts are uneducated fuckbags, had you alluded to strength and weight then damn spiderweb wins.

Dont knock me down when your statment was completely naked

Umm...okay? You're speaking as if we've had this debate before, which is incorrect; I am not OP, nor have you replied to any other post I made on here. I'm not bringing education into this, nor does it matter to me what you excel in, what matters is you giving me proof of you're correct (Experts ARE capable of being mistaken).

How did I knock you down? More so, how is my statement "completely naked"? He said one thing, you said another, I provided links to prove he was correct as I agree with him, and now you STILL have yet to give actual proof that you are correct and are being quite defensive about it.

So far, all you've achieved in my eyes is looking like an angry individual who doesn't like to be wrong (in theory. As you very well could be correct).

Besides; even IF we have had this debate before and I was, in fact, OP, it's not ME you should be replying too or having this debate about, it's those who created the reports I linked you too

Got the links for you

It may not be sensible, but sensibility is not the issue. You believed it was not stronger when, ounce for ounce, it is

It's still not sensible. If you could arrange steel in the same geometry of bone then it would outperform it. For instance, if you had a triangle made of steel and a square of steel, each weighing the same, the triangle would be able to bear more load before failure. Yet how can this be if it is made of the same material and of the same weight? Geometry.

Material Properties =/= Geometric Properties
So no, kg for kg bone is not stronger than steel, it simply has a more geometrically sound structure.

That's fine, I'm not asking you to agree with me, nor am I saying a single thing. The five sites I gave offer total explanation as to WHY bone is stronger than steel, which is the main argument, WHY it's stronger has little to do with it

Then it's phrased incorrectly.
'A Bone is stronger than the equivalent steel rod of equal weight.'

That is true, but 'A Bone' is a structure, not the material 'bone.'
'Bone,' the material, is not stronger than steel.

Ah, then perhaps you are right and we can come to a compromising agreement

(Although for the record, even though I believe you to be correct, it's not me you should try to be correcting, but those in the links I posted)

Yeh, it's an easy mistake to make tbh and looking over your sources they've al pretty much done the same (Though for their purposes of discussion it doesn't seem to actually matter.)

I'm just anal about these things because the distinction is pretty important for us engineers.

his bones aren't made of bone, they're made of glass. Which we have learned cracks at up to speeds of 3000 mph.

Actually they aren't, it was a scam all along

enlarge

i remember when they invented that episode.

that is a lovely comment.

I took swallow.

I care.

Because of massive trauma to the internal organs. That is what kills people in car accidents.

Yeah, not like broken ribs or skulls or anything else related to skeleton damage.

i know someone else who battled steel... and didnt win.....


pst... its jesus.

I'm going to hell for laughing as hard as I just did...

Pics => it happened.

ok alright maybe someone forgot that adamantium isn't real. Don't destroy my hopes

Yeah, it was Adamantium, which is stronger than steel AND bone.

Yeah, they also didn't coat them in steel. They coated them in adamantium. Which is stronger than bone and steel

They also did not cover it with steel.

Okay. What is your point?

They covered his bones in a metal. it sounded better in my head.

That stat goes by weight, If you go weight to strength ratio even spider webs are stronger than steel, but obviously if you punch a brick of steel the only thing that's going to break is your hand.

Thanks for the context!

I was wondering how falling on steel would break it.

you are right, i dont know why you were thumbed down. Steel is much less brittle than bone and if they same force is applied steel would be bent while bone would break.

It would if you were a Nord.

Tiger sharks eat fucking metal

i actually just wrote my hk exam... The statement is true for some bones, not all. For example: most of the bones in the skull can withstand more weight before breaking than a peice of steel that is the same shape and size. Most bones in the body cannot