| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
User avatar #233 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
Racism is completely different from homosexuality. This just makes you look stupid, OP, not us.
User avatar #311 to #233 - drfreeman ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
Discrimination. Ignorance. It's all the same.
User avatar #313 to #311 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
I'm not talking discrimination or ignorance here. I'm talking disagreeing.
User avatar #321 to #313 - drfreeman ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
I was referring to the similarities between racist and homophobic behavior. It's all just senseless hate fueled by uneducated scum of the earth.
User avatar #361 to #321 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
Well, homophobic implies a fear of homosexuality. I don't know about you, but the main valid arguments against homosexuality are nothing to do with fear, just disagreement.
Would you find it offensive if someone said you were the "uneducated scum of the earth" just because you disagreed with them?
User avatar #476 to #361 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
Wow, red thumbs for a valid point? Nice one FJ.
User avatar #252 to #233 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
how is it different?
User avatar #314 to #252 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
Allow me to point you to Jinpayne's comment below.
User avatar #499 to #314 - thebritishguy (01/24/2013) [-]
I didn't block you, when there are too many purple lines you can not comment any more, I raised some questions and you ignored them and just told me your opinions of me, how would this in any way prove me wrong!? that is what is ignorant, I haven't ignored you in any way. This is what I want to know, why is it against your morals to think that gay people should be married? why would a group of people who base their views on religion rather than facts be more logical? Why have you been ignoring these points?
User avatar #348 to #314 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
in the terms of what o.p is trying to show us it is just as bad, either way you are judging and stereotyping someone for silly reasons.
User avatar #360 to #348 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
I am not judging or stereotyping anyone. Don't put words in my mouth, buddy.
User avatar #380 to #360 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
I don't know why I said you I suppose I got so used to debating on the internet it became natural to accuse people
User avatar #428 to #380 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
I think everyone is, and that's why I'm getting red-thumbed. Either that or FJ is full of retards.
User avatar #471 to #428 - thebritishguy (01/21/2013) [-]
I bet it is because you said that it made "o.p look stupid" (although he had a good point) and you said "not US" implying you were with the group of gay marriage protesters
User avatar #475 to #471 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/21/2013) [-]
OP does not have a good point, he has a stupid point, and I am with gay marriage protesters. I do not go and picket events or hold up signs but I disagree with gay marriage and do not wish it to be legalized.
User avatar #483 to #475 - thebritishguy (01/22/2013) [-]
and that is why you have red thumbs, what difference will it make to you gay people can't get married? it won't affect your life at all so stop being so selfish
User avatar #486 to #483 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/22/2013) [-]
I'm not being selfish. It conflicts with my moral worldviews, as well as millions of other people's. It will affect my life.
It is both a moral and religious thing. It's not just me.
User avatar #488 to #486 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
just because you are not the only person thinking it means it is any better, it makes no difference I bet the Nazi's used that excuse. why does it conflict with your views.
User avatar #489 to #488 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/23/2013) [-]
Well, let me ask you this: One group of people believe it is right, one group of people believe it is wrong. The people who believe it is right take their view from their own opinions and what they want. The people who believe it is wrong take their view from a higher authority.
Which sounds more logical?
User avatar #490 to #489 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
well the group who says it is right are basing there opinions on facts such as there are several benefits with insurance that gay couples can't get without being married but there is no reason why they shouldn't be married. The group that says it's wrong are basing the belief on what it says in an old book that they believe is written by a wizard and says that women shouldn't teach or have authority over men.
User avatar #491 to #490 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
Which sounds more logical?
User avatar #492 to #491 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/23/2013) [-]
You really are that ignorant, aren't you? Go away, read up on your facts, and come back when you actually know what the opposing argument is instead of just typing up rubbish. It makes you look stupid.
User avatar #493 to #492 - thebritishguy (01/23/2013) [-]
you really are that ignorant aren't you? evading the point, I know the opposing argument it is that it says in the bible that marriage should be between a man and a women and gay people are among the lawless, unholy and sinners
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/1tim/1.html#10
User avatar #494 to #493 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/23/2013) [-]
I cannot take you seriously and do not value your argument at all, so yes, I am evading the point, because I do not count you as a worthwhile debater. The reason? You are stupid enough to say that Christianity is based on some people believing an old book written by a wizard... That just... that's... just too retarded for words. You are an idiot.
User avatar #495 to #494 - thebritishguy (01/24/2013) [-]
well then you are ignorant, I obviously know that you do not call him a wizard but the only difference between god and a wizard is he lives in some clouds or some shit and then there is the book which is old
User avatar #496 to #495 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/24/2013) [-]
No, I'm not the ignorant one here, you are. Go away and figure out what's actually going on. When you try and talk about things but have no clue about anything concerning those things, you sound like an idiot.
User avatar #498 to #496 - Axemaniax **User deleted account** (01/24/2013) [-]
Very clever. Blocked me so I can't reply to your comment. I ignored all your points because you have proven that you are incapable of forming a coherent thought.
Case closed, I'm out.
User avatar #497 to #496 - thebritishguy (01/24/2013) [-]
you are ignoring all of my points and questions and are just repeating yourself and then you call me ignorant?
 Friends (0)