Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search
#167 - thechurchchurch (01/21/2013) [-]
>"As long as its between two consenting adults,they should be allowed to get married,you ******* hillbilly!"
>"Blood relatives getting married? **** no,you ******* hillbilly!"

Seriously though,I dont really have a problem with gay marriage,but dont act like youre so different from those people protesting.I don't see any of you tolerant progressives advocating for a pair of siblings wanting shack up.
#189 to #167 - zanea ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
In the case of gay couples, they can't have children conventionally, but with inbreeding, the child could come out deformed or have a ton of other problems thus causing them to have a lesser quality of life. I have no problem with homosexuality, but inbreeding is pretty damn bad in most situations within our society.
User avatar #191 to #189 - thechurchchurch (01/21/2013) [-]
but you still want to stop two consenting adults from marrying.You dont see a contradiction there?
User avatar #198 to #191 - zanea ONLINE (01/21/2013) [-]
I wasn't saying there wasn't I contradiction. Yes there are many loop holes within societal logic. But which would you rather see, a normal child with two gay parents, or a horribly disfigured child with the two idiots that created it?


I'm also not assuming you are in favor of incest as you are intelligent enough to use a computer. ( just in case I sounded condescending)
User avatar #216 to #198 - thechurchchurch (01/21/2013) [-]
Well thats the liberal argument isn't it?It doesn't matter what I personally want to see,its none of my business who people get to marry and if they choose to have/adopt kids.

Like I said,I dont really have anything against gay marriage,but I do have a problem with people using the term "marriage equality". Unless you unilaterally support "two consenting adults"(and gay advocates love to use this term),you're not for marriage equality.You're for YOUR groups equality,not anybody elses.Thats why this post just seems so arrogant to me.

I mean,what if all those people protesting gay marriage were supportive of inter racial marriages way back when?What if they supported the equivalent of todays "marriage equality" and just dont like gay marriage?Why is that so wrong? And by the same token,what if the people supporting gay marriage today protest the marriages of the incestious marriage movement(if one were to arise,you never know.I doubt people in their time thought there would be a gay marriage movement).Would they be "stupid" if they didn't conform with the younger generations?

There are just so many reasons why this PC bashing of anti-gay marriage people annoys me.But I'm sorry for ranting.
User avatar #172 to #167 - franklion (01/21/2013) [-]
good point, everyone seems to overlook that.
 Friends (0)