| All | Popular >
|
fucking-tumblr
|
4chan
|
pokemon
|
funny
|
videogames
|
oc-comic-makers
|
doctor-who
|
fucking-science
|
animemanga
|
masseffect
|
wallpapers
|
finalfantasy
|
uncharted-time
|
gameofthrones
|
gifbin
|
feels
|
ponytime
|
skyrim
|
lol-channel
|
atheism
|
pickogram
|
darksoulstime
|
morbid-channel
|
fucking-guns
|
katawashoujo
|
roosterteethtime
|
disneytime
|
fucking-fail
|
gif-channel
|
dinotime
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply +1
User avatar #145 - britannia (01/18/2013) [-]
i do like harry potter but if you think about it the characterization is lacking in depth completely - every character is so one-dimensional with the possible exception of harry. bearing in mind the books have transcended the childrens book tag you'd think the characters could have grown and developed over time but nope, they are completely constant. neville grows a pair of spuds and thats about it.

tl;dr JK rowling not as great at writing as given credit for
inb4 hurr durr no, harry potter is flawless
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
User avatar #154 to #145 - tyuru (01/18/2013) [-]
i value your input and appreciate the perspective, although i may not entirely agree you still get a thumb.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
#160 to #154 - britannia (01/18/2013) [-]
the one HP fan whose jimmies were not rustled! i salute you.
the one HP fan whose jimmies were not rustled! i salute you.
Hide Hide All +Fav (0) Reply 0
#147 to #145 - N. Korean citizen (01/18/2013) [-]
I thought the characters devoloped in a wonderful way. They were just kids put in terrible positions.
Back to the content 'Homework'
<
>
 Friends (0)