Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - astraea (01/17/2013) [-]
but of course!
C - C - B - D - D - A?
Here's my reasons:
1. I prefer this weapon because its just one shot to the brain, and (I think) it would be easier to find ammunition for a more common weapon.
2. Silence. I dont want to attract any zombies.
3. Katana. well. Because. It slices up people easily and it doesent really make much noise.
4. Multi-Tool. Might come in handy. I dont know.
5. I want to get off this zombie infested land into a more secure place. Maybe another country. (If we have the gas)
6. Bear Grylls (atleast his character) knows how to survive in the wild. Thats good.
(I would choose D but im too young to be seen as any kind of sexual partner.)
#6 to #3 - yourafaggotharry ONLINE (01/17/2013) [-]
i would go for something like this but in my opinion the id wield the bat every time, if the infection is through blood you wouldn't want it spraying everywhere,. also it might get stuck in the zombie same problem with the machete. still the boat every time and I like all of your other choices, the silenced pistol easily being able to take out a couple of zombies with out alerting a whole horde. pic not related
User avatar #8 to #6 - astraea (01/17/2013) [-]
Yeah I was actually debating between a katana and the bat, BUT!
The bat you need some power behind the hit, and if you're pinned down you would be able to slice him up slowly by pushing it forward against his face or something. But with the bat you need, as I said, some force before the hit. (If you get what im trying to say)
User avatar #10 to #8 - astraea (01/17/2013) [-]
Side note: I tought you got infected by being bitten, not trough getting their blood on you
 Friends (0)