Anti-Pro-Gun. A different take on the gun debate, with poppies.. alh' ' ittl tn. I'm not anti-gun. I'm anti-getting-shot, so excuse me if I get scared when people walk around with guns visible. antigun progun Guns Poppies Remembrance memetics
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #9 - gagster ONLINE (01/17/2013) [+] (48 replies)
I'm not anti-gun. I'm anti-getting-shot, so excuse me if I get ******* scared when people walk around with guns visible.
#16 - lulzdealer (01/17/2013) [+] (5 replies)
This image has expired
reasonable. coming from a gun owner, i believe there should be background checks and whatnot, but limiting the kind of firearms we can own only punishes the responsible majority for the actions of the insane few. if anything we should be helping the mentally disturbed
User avatar #7 - mookiez (01/17/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Dude, I'm addicted to opiates. I did not want to see those pictures.
User avatar #8 to #7 - timxcampbell (01/17/2013) [-]
Mookie, I'm sorry to hear about your addiction. The poppy flowers in the background of the picture are NOT associated with opiates. They are the poppies associated with a famous poem called "In Flanders Fields." Since the poppies in the poem were growing in France during the early 1900's I doubt they were the types that could be used to create opiates.
#155 - Yojimbo (01/18/2013) [+] (3 replies)
> MFW Anti-gun people solely blame guns for shootings
> MFW Pro-gun people think Anti-gun people want to take all their guns, not just assault weapons
>MFW Pro-gun people deflect talk about guns by blaming Mortal Kombat
>MFW Anti-gun people bring up statistics from other countries as if they relate to us.
> MFW Conspiracists think Sandy Hook was a hoax propagated by Future Dictator Obama to eliminate all guns and turn America into a totalitarian state ruled by him.

Are your jimmies not rustled?
#123 - paintplayer (01/18/2013) [+] (5 replies)
No one ever robs shooting ranges even though they are sites containing many expensive items as well as cash in the till because if they tried, everyone there has loaded weapons and would shoot them immediately. Apply this to real life. Increased gun ownership would create the "anyone could be armed" environment, and probably discourage violence by the .0000000000001% who consider it something they would do. So let's increase responsibility among gun owners and the number of responsible gun owners rather than disarming those who would protect us if someone should become an issue.
User avatar #121 - fedegon (01/18/2013) [-]
Congratulations OP, you created a ********* with a neutral post!
User avatar #185 - dapape (01/18/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Guys guys guys....

Sandy Hook shooting was a hoax.

Before you thumb me down do your homework ;)
#190 to #185 - mistahlegend (01/18/2013) [-]
**** you and your winky face.
User avatar #1 - charagrin (01/17/2013) [+] (2 replies)
I am pro-gun and I agree completely. It is a mix of everything that will help heal the wound, but even then there is no guarantee.
#3 to #2 - kerryman (01/17/2013) [-]
I beg to differ!
#126 - djequalizee (01/18/2013) [+] (10 replies)
Id rather be shot in the head then stabbed and beaten with blunt objects.
#27 - forkutensil (01/17/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Why not just un-invent guns?
Why not just un-invent guns?
#57 - unncommon (01/18/2013) [+] (1 reply)
**unncommon rolled a random image posted in comment #2648075 at My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic ** What the solution actually is.
#46 - Sunset has deleted their comment [+] (15 replies)
User avatar #47 to #46 - Crusader (01/18/2013) [-]
Water serves a purpose other than to kill stuff more efficiently.
User avatar #214 - clasp (01/18/2013) [+] (1 reply)
Can we please just all go back to swords and **** ?
User avatar #200 - Bravechampion (01/18/2013) [+] (3 replies)
Drugs are illegal, so criminals can't do them; and, If we make guns illegal, criminals can't get them and do the illegal activity of killing people.
#203 to #200 - warriortnt (01/18/2013) [-]
This is supposed to be sarcasm right?
User avatar #180 - mayormilkman (01/18/2013) [+] (2 replies)
Solution: grow bullet-proof skin
User avatar #139 - phonerstonerboner (01/18/2013) [+] (5 replies)
My only pro-gun argument is Switzerland.

>1-in-2 adults carries a firearm
>gun ownership required by government
>lowest crime rate in the world
User avatar #130 - Marker (01/18/2013) [-]
It's so neutral..... that it works.
User avatar #120 - howyafj (01/18/2013) [+] (5 replies)
Long post but riddle me this. Gun free zones and/or anit-gun zones promote a premium choice for some nut job to walk in and start blasting away at innocent people who are unarmed. The solution is more relaxed gun laws to allow civilians to carry weapons open or concealed. Thus in the event some nut job decides to go postal he won't be dealing with an easy task. Instead of him blasting away easy, unarmed targets, he will face other armed citizens firing back, thus killing him before he can kill 20 innocent children. Some people will argue "but everyone walking around packing will create mass shootings and more violence". Is it not happening already? With the vast majority of people armed it would almost eliminate mass shootings, these crazy people target easy, unarmed people in "safe, gun-free zones" such as malls, movie theaters. and schools. You don't see these people going postal on police stations, military bases or at gun shows because they know the people they are targeting will be firing back. Guns exist, passing any law furthering their restrictions will only place the weapons in bad-guy's hands and not in yours. You, a law-abiding citizen will be left unarmed, or with a limited magazine capacity because of upcoming gun laws.
#5 - awesomechardey (01/17/2013) [-]
OP has a good point there
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)