| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#355
-
N. Korean citizen (01/18/2013) [-]
Tbh that's not a bad idea, the second amendment was all about self defense, and frankly if you cant defend yourself with 10 rounds you don't even deserve to own a gun.
#579 to #549
-
schneidend (01/18/2013) [-]
The likelihood of its occurrence is irrelevant to whether or not you should take precautions against it. The chances of being struck by lightning are incredibly remote. Should I walk outside during a lightning storm, climb up a ladder and hold a golf club skyward?
As #479 pointed out, the 2nd Amendment's intention was to allow civilians to protect themselves in case of invasion or to protect themselves against the government if it went completely overboard. Makes a lot of sense to me, regardless of how unlikely either event might be.
As #479 pointed out, the 2nd Amendment's intention was to allow civilians to protect themselves in case of invasion or to protect themselves against the government if it went completely overboard. Makes a lot of sense to me, regardless of how unlikely either event might be.
My army vet of a dad and all of his friends that were also in the army call them clips. He said his head sergeant did too. I'm aware it's not the "proper" term for them but the point of communication is to get the point across. That's all I'm saying.
"Here go into this hostile country where there is always a possibility that the helicopter you are on may be shot down... we're not going to be giving you a weapon to defend yourself if that were to happen though." lolwut.jpg
In other words no, he had his rifle with him at all times just like every other crew chief.
In other words no, he had his rifle with him at all times just like every other crew chief.