Upload
YouTube Videos Funny Pictures Funny GIFs Funny Text Funny Movies
Login or register
  • Your Posts
  • Login or register
    Login / Create Account
    Create Account
    Email is optional and is used for password recovery purposes.
     
    Click to Create Account
    Login to FJ
    reset password
    Click to Login
    Log in/Sign with Facebook.
    Log in/Sign up with Gmail.
  • Create Channel WholesomeMemes vidyagaems 4chan aww politics Tumblr-Content twitter marvel animemanga dccomics cute CartoonGoodness fallout FJNN UnlimitFateWorks cat gameofthrones tf2 art Daily-Jokes MemeComps OneForAll starwars polandball dank-webms cringe-channel overwatch-time darksoulstime Raven videogames Randomthoughts RainbowSixSiege overwatch oc-comic-makers pokemon dungeons-n-drags loudhouse CuteKemonomimis
    Home
    Reset viewedpages
    Sort: ThumbsTrending
      New!When you're shy, but you also have a crush on someoneWhen you're shy, but you also have a crush on someone
      273
      3 hrs ago
      New!grouchy efficient Flygrouchy efficient Fly
      433
      3 hrs ago
      marvelous possible Goldfishmarvelous possible Goldfish
      509
      4 hrs ago
      overfortressoverfortress
      389
      4 hrs ago
      New!ReeeeReeee
      221
      3 hrs ago
      New!Puppy slidePuppy slide
      197
      3 hrs ago
      Deploy the BoyDeploy the Boy
      316
      4 hrs ago
      This geometry ...This geometry ...
      496
      5 hrs ago
      New!easy afraid Flyeasy afraid Fly
      100
      1 hr ago
      New!They call me the "Master of Romance™"They call me the "Master of Romance™"
      371
      3 hrs ago
      What the fact?What the fact?
      448
      5 hrs ago
      New!Finland Cancelling Basic IncomeFinland Cancelling Basic Income
      86
      1 hr ago
      New!graceful pastoral Rabbitgraceful pastoral Rabbit
      136
      2 hrs ago
      By condemning the previous, we could have stopped the following.By condemning the previous, we could have stopped the following.
      477
      6 hrs ago
      New!phonephone
      256
      3 hrs ago
      Lemme toot you a good songLemme toot you a good song
      357
      6 hrs ago
      New!tenuous outrageous Horsetenuous outrageous Horse
      113
      2 hrs ago
      New!funny aback helpful Railfunny aback helpful Rail
      139
      2 hrs ago
      Box mazeBox maze
      408
      6 hrs ago
      THE MAGIC OF THE INTERNETTHE MAGIC OF THE INTERNET
      252
      4 hrs ago
      watchwatch
      209
      4 hrs ago
      some god of war memessome god of war memes
      433
      7 hrs ago
      brutalbrutal
      838
      10 hrs ago
      New!responsible outgoing elastic Mallardresponsible outgoing elastic Mallard
      58
      1 hr ago
      New!How Do We Stop The Train?How Do We Stop The Train?
      84
      1 hr ago
      New!Panja is over qualificationPanja is over qualification
      152
      3 hrs ago
      MelonMelon
      783
      11 hrs ago
      New!This is still one of my all time favourite gifThis is still one of my all time favourite gif
      62
      1 hr ago
      New!ARE YOU ----ING SORRY?!ARE YOU ----ING SORRY?!
      143
      3 hrs ago
      Jane LaneJane Lane
      238
      6 hrs ago
    Newest Uploads
      Caster Route!Caster Route!
      1
      1 mn ago
      Joke a Day 274Joke a Day 274
      0
      1 mn ago
      This child after being freed from ISIS by Iraqi soldiers.This child after being freed from ISIS by Iraqi soldiers.
      0
      2 mns ago
      wholesomewholesome
      0
      3 mns ago
      Wrecking MakoWrecking Mako
      -2
      5 mns ago
      learned odd Quelealearned odd Quelea
      1
      5 mns ago
      accidental heartbreaking early Wallabyaccidental heartbreaking early Wallaby
      3
      6 mns ago
      This stop motionThis stop motion
      2
      7 mns ago
      ..
      1
      11 mns ago
      Triggered by my girlfriendTriggered by my girlfriend
      0
      12 mns ago
    User Rankings Funny Pictures Videos / MP4s HD Gifs/Soundless MP4 Animated GIFs YouTube Videos Text Posts
    About us
    • Advertise on FJ
    • Copyright/DMCA Removal
    • Report Abuse/Harassment
    • Report Spam
    • Contact Us
    • Unsubscribe from newsletter
    Remaining character count: 4000
    Spoiler Image
    Shortcuts: "C" opens comments. "R" refreshes comments.
    Record voice message?
    0:00 Click to start recording.
    Scroll to comment?
    Back to the content 'Thanks Obama!'
    Refresh
    Options
    asd
    2 new threads. 1 new replies.
    User avatar#324 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-6
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    If someone can give me one good reason for a civilian to own an automatic rifle, I will go to their side of the argument. No paranoid ********, that doesn't count as a good reason.
    User avatar#410 to #324 - aceofshadows
    Reply+6
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    If you're as ignorant as your post makes you look, I wouldn't want you on my side.
    User avatar#418 to #410 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-2
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    I'm giving reasons for my thoughts instead of just calling someone "ignorant". Let's see you bring up a good point for your side that I haven't already **** logic on below you teenage videogame addicted stupid cunt.
    User avatar#425 to #418 - aceofshadows
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    "teenage videogame addicted stupid cunt"

    You're ignorant.
    User avatar#432 to #425 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Okay, I'm ignorant. Tell me why. Tell me why the public will ever need automatic guns (and please read below, I've covered most ******** arguments.)
    User avatar#474 to #432 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+2
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    "Covered" or otherwise known as put his fingers in his ears and yelling "NAHH NAHH I CAN'T HEAR YOU"
    User avatar#380 to #324 - lazorman
    Reply+4
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    It's not to protect yourself from other people
    it's to protect yourself from tyranny; from either a foreign or domestic government

    insurance for bad politics, basically.
    nothing wrong with not wanting to make yourself helpless, ya know?
    User avatar#390 to #380 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Until criminals get the guns. This is the United States of America, and anyone with any foresight can tell that we will most likely never need to revolt.
    User avatar#608 to #390 - schneidend#416 on commentsRank#416
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    And what if they try to pass the Metahuman Registration Act? What then? We endanger Spider-Man's loved ones by forcing him to reveal his secret identity? **** that. He's a hero.
    #496 to #390 - marrrty
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    even if they did ban guns criminals would still get them, it would be just like illegal drugs even though they are "banned" a **** ton of people still get them.
    User avatar#406 to #390 - lazorman
    Reply+3
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    lol wot
    the fact that we're even having this discussion is proof enough that it's not about individual liberty for many people and politicians, it's about forcing what THEY think is the right thing. it happens on both sides

    "i dont think guns make sense, so lets get rid of them for everyone!"
    "I dont want to pay into a medicare program, so lets just end it!"

    so yeah. liberty and social choice isn't given out by authority, it has to be maintained by the people.
    User avatar#412 to #406 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    I think most of what you're saying in this message is covered by more of my other replies below. I'm honestly getting tired and losing my conviction to care enough to argue, I'm just trying to close up lose ends so I can move on.
    #419 to #412 - lazorman
    Reply+1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    AH JUS CANT TRUST DUH GUVMNINT NO MO
    AH JUS CANT TRUST DUH GUVMNINT NO MO
    User avatar#446 to #419 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Among this fecal hurricane, thanks for being reasonable. It's refreshing.
    User avatar#454 to #446 - lazorman
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    well if there's one thing I love, its a fecal hurricane!
    #376 to #324 - anon id: 98d2a7a5
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    here i did a little research for you on firearm homicide enjoy
    12996 homicides in 2010 8775 homicides by firearms in 2010
    6009 handguns=46% of total homicides 68.5% of firearm homicides
    358 rifles=2.7% of total homicides 4.1% of firearm homicides
    373 shotguns=2.9% of total homicides 4.3% of firearm homicides
    96 other guns=0.7% of total homicides 1.1% of firearm homicides
    1939 not stated= 14.9% of total homicides 22.1% of firearm homicides
    Source www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/

    #384 to #376 - anon id: 98d2a7a5
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    As you can see most gun homicides in the US are done by a handgun. I dont see anyone bitching about them. You are more likely to get beaten to death than you are to get killed by an assault rifle. **** you are more likely to get stabbed than shot by anything else besides a handgun.
    User avatar#482 to #384 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    More people have guns and knives and things than automatic weapons. In the shootouts that do have automatic weapons, more people are likely to get shot.
    #429 to #384 - whogivesaratsass
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    someone has a lot of time on their hands
    User avatar#361 to #324 - schneidend#416 on commentsRank#416
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Technically, mercenaries are civilians.

    But, seriously: marksmanship is a hobby that exists, people collect firearms, a more powerful weapon gives the owner an edge in home defense.
    User avatar#368 to #361 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    The only home defense situation that would warrant the use of an automatic weapon is against another automatic weapon. As a hobby, I say **** that, public safety comes first. You can have just as much fun shooting cans with a pistol or hunting rifle or even a shotgun. If you really want to shoot up a school or play rambo in the back yard, you can make your own gun.
    User avatar#386 to #368 - schneidend#416 on commentsRank#416
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Like I said, an "edge." As in, an advantage. If a dude breaks in with a pistol, and you have a carbine, he's pretty much ****** unless he's an awesome shot.

    Regardless, exactly how is public safety more protected if assault rifles are illegal but shotguns are kosher? You'd probably kill/wound/maim more people emptying a shotgun into a crowd than a SMG or assault rifle.
    User avatar#423 to #386 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Shotguns aren't as deadly at range.
    User avatar#452 to #423 - schneidend#416 on commentsRank#416
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Point, but how much range do we need to consider something dangerous? You can hit things accurately from 50 yards or more with buckshot, IIRC. If we're worried about especially long ranges, a hunting rifle is just as capable of picking off somebody from far away.
    User avatar#459 to #452 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Hunting rifle can't get off as many shots per second as an automatic weapon.
    User avatar#475 to #459 - schneidend#416 on commentsRank#416
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Ah, so we're only interested in protect large groups of people stand very close together, and not individuals?

    You can't have it both ways. Automatic fire isn't going to accurately hit people from 100+ yards away. If you're going to use a rifle, any rifle, for its range you'll need to place your shots, and fire single-shot or in the briefest of bursts.
    User avatar#359 to #324 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    This has nothing to do with automatic fire capabilities, but more with uneducated thinking that a gun with a pistol grip and adjustable stock is a "high powered military assault weapon", .223 is a **** tier cartridge, but nobody is interested in banning large caliber "hunting rifles"
    User avatar#364 to #359 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    I just now heard about the ban, so I don't know much about it, but I personally think that any automatic fire weaponry has a place in the public's hands.
    User avatar#381 to #364 - noblexfenrir
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    "I just now heard about the ban, so I don't know much about it"

    Why don't you try reading the damn thing before giving your opinion. You'll seem less ignorant that way.

    You do realize that automatic weapons are a minority when it comes to gun deaths right?
    User avatar#397 to #381 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    I'm not talking about the ******* gun ban, I'm talking about gun rights in general. And yeah, automatic weapons are a minority, because less people HAVE them. In the situations WITH automatic weapons more people die than in the situations with handguns and ****.
    User avatar#439 to #397 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    As I said earlier, murders with legal automatics have only happened twice, and no, auto =/= more kills, that is complete and total ********. Automatic fire is exceedingly difficult to control, and wastes ammunition. Shot placement > volume of fire, just look at Simo Hayha, he killed over 500 Russians in the winter war wit his bolt-action mosin nagant, and they were doing a hell of a lot more than shooting back at him.
    User avatar#414 to #397 - noblexfenrir
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    You're joking right? There are most instances around the world of MANY more individuals being killed by a killer wielding a KNIFE than an assault weapon.
    User avatar#436 to #414 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Yeah no ****, because knifes are easier to get. But in the event of a shootout with an assault rifle, more people will die than in a knife fight.
    User avatar#445 to #436 - noblexfenrir
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Or someone with that assault rifle could stop someone going on a killing spree with a knife. I literally also just said, MORE PEOPLE ARE KILLED IN MANY EVENTS INVOLVING KNIVES THAN ASSAULT WEAPONS, meaning, there are more cases in which higher numbers are murdered as a result of knives than assault weapons.

    Why aren't you advocating the ban of knives?
    User avatar#451 to #445 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Your argument has deteriorated into rabble. This portion of the thread is done.
    User avatar#455 to #451 - noblexfenrir
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    So you can't answer my question, therefor you end the conversation. Very nice showing how childish you are.
    User avatar#374 to #364 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    In order to obtain one, you need to either be a class 3 FFL, or jump through some hoops with the BATFE, and even then you must find a transferable, preban automatic which can cost between $25,000-$50,000. and then it is registered with the BATFE as an NFA weapon.
    also, to my knowledge, only 2 murders have ever been committed with a legally owned automatic.
    User avatar#385 to #374 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Without a place to get them legally, there's nowhere to get them ILlegally. Someone with a good record and **** probly buys 'em and sells for a higher price to criminals.
    User avatar#421 to #385 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    The United States has some of the worst border (land and sea) security in the world,most guns used in crimes are smuggled in. And with minimal instruction a single person can turn out ~30 STEN family submachineguns in a day with minimal equipment.
    And people do not "resell" NFA weapons and accesories, because they are registered, and the BATFE does regular inspections.
    User avatar#437 to #421 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    The less options criminals have to get guns, the better. Less is better than more, even if none isn't an option.
    User avatar#447 to #437 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    A complete ban on guns would work in some countries, in America, it would just make it worse.
    User avatar#453 to #447 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Based on what logic?
    User avatar#477 to #453 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    The amount of guns in the country, 50% of the worlds guns. The US government does not have the resources to confiscate all of them. and most states do not have gun registries, so nobody knows who owns what. essentially the best they can do is disarm the law abiding citizens while criminals keep the guns they have and buy up more from crooked government agents. And even if they had the resources, the sheer cost would push them over the fiscal cliff.
    User avatar#486 to #477 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    All you need is a few cops per city going door to door searching houses for the assault weapons (and possibly finding more evidence to crimes) during the times they would normally be gaffing about.
    User avatar#494 to #486 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    That would take years, and confiscation would be handled by the BATFE, an organization with an overinflated budget and incompetent bureaucrats. Also, some towns, cities, and states have the authority to deny access to federal agents.
    User avatar#499 to #494 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Well that's ****** up. Still, the actual confiscation measures is another argument entirely. I was merely talking about the concept, not the logistics.
    User avatar#348 to #324 - noblexfenrir
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Give me one reason a household needs more than one knife, a single knife can kill multiple individuals and CHILDREN! So obviously to protect the CHILDREN we should remove all knives from peoples homes, I mean why would they possibly need more than one? Oh and they also need to be registered and you need to have a background check whenever you sharpen it.

    Seriously though, we are talking about guns and clip sizes in general, people should be able to own them because it is used for sport, fun, and self-defense, and yes self=defense counts as a ******* reason it's not "paranoid" ********.
    User avatar#357 to #348 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Sport and fun are below public safety, and there is not one goddamn person who is gonna break into your house that you would be more well off with an assault rifle than with a pistol or hunting rifle.
    User avatar#379 to #357 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    A "hunting rifle" rifle is pretty much the worst thing possible for home defense, you'd be better off hitting him over the head with it.
    Also, like "assault weapons", the term "hunting rifle" has no definition, one could cut rifling grooves in a lead pipe, fire a bullet out of it at an animal and it could be classed as a "hunting rifle".
    User avatar#366 to #357 - noblexfenrir
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Public safety? Guns stop more crimes then they cause. You should probably address my whole knife thing then, they kill people, why is it not being stopped?

    " there is not one goddamn person who is gonna break into your house that you would be more well off with an assault rifle than with a pistol or hunting rifle."

    I'm not talking about purely assault weapons, I'm talking guns in general no matter the clip size.
    #345 to #324 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    1. To form a militia
    2. Recreation
    3. Red Dawn
    I know the last 2 are BS
    He fact is the U.S. is such a large country that a revolution would be too hard without them. The large amount of shootings is because of huge test group, and too many human rights for the homicidal and crazy people. I dont see why people complain about the u.s. and guns when in some European countries trains are being blown up and people lob grenades into crowds.
    User avatar#352 to #345 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    What are you, retarded? You think a few hicks with guns can rival the UNITED STATES MILITARY? That's ignorant as ****.
    #400 to #352 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Well, you judgemental raccoon, most hick have more then a "few" guns. I know people who have armories practically. They would distribute them to the rest of the unarmed militia. By your logic, a "few" hicks would attempt to take the strongest and most advanced miitary force in the world alone, carrying 20 or so guns each.
    User avatar#407 to #400 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Let's give an entire city assault rifles. 1 each, plenty of ammo. Now tell me, how is that gonna help when TANKS are rolling through the streets? Do civilians have bomber jets?
    User avatar#457 to #407 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Take a look at Stalingrad, children destroyed as many tanks with molotovs as the red army did. And the US government has a limit on how much force its willing to use on revolutionaries. airstrikes would likely be limited to rural areas, and if a revolution were to happen, a large portion of the military would defect, with their equipment.
    User avatar#472 to #457 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    So in event of a revolution, the military defectors would bring assault weapons to the civilians? Then why do the civilians need to buy any now?
    User avatar#483 to #472 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Not "assault weapons" (that isn't a real word btw), the soldiers may have their issued firearms, but the equipment I mentioned would be thins like tanks, aircraft, artillery pieces, even ships.
    User avatar#488 to #483 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    That makes the automatic weapons seem pretty insignificant, doesn't it?
    #508 to #488 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    No. All those things are controlled by men. Men are susceptible to guns. A battleship know neither good nor evil, it merely shoots when you tell it to.
    User avatar#514 to #508 - demandsgayversion
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    A battleship isn't controlled by man? Really, I do love philosophy, but this is not the place for it. B for effort.
    #530 to #514 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    F for failure to read correctly. I said that they ARE controlled by men. Please double check before making incorrect statements in the future.
    User avatar#534 to #530 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Bad grammar, you opposed guns against ships, whether you meant to or not. I'm sorry I can't ******* read minds!
    #552 to #534 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Apology accepted. As for the grammar, keys are missed that result in bad spelling, but the grammar shows no error. Again, please double check your responses. The sentence in question was a simple declarative statement.
    User avatar#500 to #488 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    The only place of tanks on the modern battlefield is against other armored vehicles, a fighter jet cannot stand on a street corner and keep order, ships cannot search houses, automatic weapons are the backbone of a revolution.
    User avatar#509 to #500 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    You can't search a house with a pistol? And I'm sure one of those ships, tanks, or aircraft has some automatic weapons in them.
    User avatar#526 to #509 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Clearing rooms isn't as easy as kicking a door down and sticking your head inside, and a ships armory doesn't not contain enough weapons to arm every revolutionary in the US.
    User avatar#532 to #526 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    I still call it an effective revolution.
    User avatar#542 to #532 - leettaco
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    100 million gun owners vs US gov = revolutionary victory
    100 million former gun owners running around with improvised guns and a bit of military equipment = 100 million people executed for treason because they used their second amendment right to rise up against a tyrannical government.
    User avatar#547 to #542 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    100 million people wouldn't HAVE guns otherwise, automatically (pun). That's a dangerous assumption.
    #583 to #547 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Now, to business. I quote, "If someone can give me one good reason for a civilian to own an automatic rifle, I will go to their side of the argument. No paranoid ********, that doesn't count as a good reason." You have your good reason. Your attempts to refute these reasons have been quelled. I hope you accept our arguments and see the validity of them. But the real question is, will you deliver?
    User avatar#590 to #583 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Nope. I got the last word on all arguments that weren't faff. I saw zero good reasons.
    #614 to #590 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    If you truely feel that way, then i feel sorry for you. What is the purpose of posing a question that you do not want the answer to? Do you fear truth? If so, as the evidence suggests, you are a lost cause. Have fun with your misconstrued notions of logic.
    User avatar#681 to #614 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    I wasn't posing a question, I was challenging a debate. You may feel I lost, and that's your own bias view, but in my eyes, there was no argument I didn't prove as invalid. If you want to say I didn't argue correctly, that is your prerogative, and you can cease contact with me as I did those I felt were using backwards logic.
    #705 to #681 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    You asked, we answered.
    #440 to #407 - anon id: 8071ecb7
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Building are pretty solid defense against tanks. A tall building will be too high for the tank to fire upon. Civilians can have military anti tank weapons in some states, IEDs are pretty effective, and C4 can be made at home in about a month. Your close minded views on military strategy and weapon effectiveness is appalling. Not to mention your belief of extreme government oppression and control.
    #367 to #352 - internetzsoviet
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Are you ******* stupid? You honestly think the whole US Military is gonna gun down its own citizens? They'll probably turn along with the citizens.   
   
The Marines will not kill any US citizens under any circumstances. More than half the Army and National Guard arent about to either.
    Are you ******* stupid? You honestly think the whole US Military is gonna gun down its own citizens? They'll probably turn along with the citizens.

    The Marines will not kill any US citizens under any circumstances. More than half the Army and National Guard arent about to either.
    User avatar#372 to #367 - demandsgayversion
    Reply+1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Do you really think America will ever need/have a revolution? No. That's just retarded paranoid "Obama is a terrorist taking over the government" ********.
    User avatar#388 to #372 - noblexfenrir
    Reply+1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    "Do you really think America will ever need/have a revolution?"

    YES, you know how I know? Because we already have had one, hence the american revolution. and you know what's funnier? That was for even less **** then is happening now.
    User avatar#401 to #388 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    That has to be the dumbest argument yet. The American revolution WAS AGAINST BRITAIN! The MONARCHY! We're a ******* democracy now, and if someone seems tyrannty, we're not gonna elect 'em! If we're stupid enough to elect a tyrant, than I doubt we'll care enough to revolt over it.
    User avatar#430 to #401 - noblexfenrir
    Reply-1
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Really? Because the one thing that gives civilians a force advantage over the government is being demonized against. Also the reason we revolted was because we weren't being given a say in parliament, so in a situation where I don't know, almost all legal gun owners in america are being silenced due to the popularization of one instance of mass murder when guns deter more crime and stop more crime than they cause, seems like a pretty similar scenario sparky.
    User avatar#375 to #372 - internetzsoviet
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    Of course it is. Obama is not a terrorist but he is a less than proficient leader in protecting American rights.

    Thinking that the government wont ever turn on its population is a stupid idea. History is filled with examples of it.
    User avatar#387 to #375 - demandsgayversion
    Reply0
    (01/18/2013)[-]
    You're a paranoid nutjob, our conversation is done.
    Back to the content 'Thanks Obama!'

    Top in 24 Hours

    • When you're shy, but you also have a crush on someone
      When you're shy, but you also have a crush on someone

      273
      3h ago
    • grouchy efficient Fly
      grouchy efficient Fly

      433
      3h ago
    • marvelous possible Goldfish
      marvelous possible Goldfish

      509
      4h ago
    • overfortress
      overfortress

      389
      4h ago
    • Reeee
      Reeee

      221
      3h ago
    • Puppy slide
      Puppy slide

      197
      3h ago
    • Deploy the Boy
      Deploy the Boy

      316
      4h ago
    • This geometry ...
      This geometry ...

      496
      5h ago
    • easy afraid Fly
      easy afraid Fly

      100
      1h ago
    • They call me the "Master of Romance™"
      They call me the "Master of Romance™"

      371
      3h ago
    • What the fact?
      What the fact?

      448
      5h ago
    • Finland Cancelling Basic Income
      Finland Cancelling Basic Income

      86
      1h ago
    • graceful pastoral Rabbit
      graceful pastoral Rabbit

      136
      2h ago
    • By condemning the previous, we could have stopped the following.
      By condemning the previous, we could have stopped the following.

      477
      6h ago
    • phone
      phone

      256
      3h ago
    • Lemme toot you a good song
      Lemme toot you a good song

      357
      6h ago
    • tenuous outrageous Horse
      tenuous outrageous Horse

      113
      2h ago
    • funny aback helpful Rail
      funny aback helpful Rail

      139
      2h ago
    • Box maze
      Box maze

      408
      6h ago
    • THE MAGIC OF THE INTERNET
      THE MAGIC OF THE INTERNET

      252
      4h ago
    • watch
      watch

      208
      4h ago
    • some god of war memes
      some god of war memes

      433
      7h ago
    • brutal
      brutal

      838
      10h ago
    • responsible outgoing elastic Mallard
      responsible outgoing elastic Mallard

      58
      1h ago
    • How Do We Stop The Train?
      How Do We Stop The Train?

      84
      1h ago
    • Panja is over qualification
      Panja is over qualification

      152
      3h ago
    • Melon
      Melon

      783
      11h ago
    • This is still one of my all time favourite gif
      This is still one of my all time favourite gif

      62
      1h ago
    • ARE YOU ----ING SORRY?!
      ARE YOU ----ING SORRY?!

      143
      3h ago
    • Jane Lane
      Jane Lane

      238
      6h ago
    • Vault Luck Roll
      Vault Luck Roll

      310
      8h ago
    • macabre clammy Kouprey
      macabre clammy Kouprey

      187
      4h ago
    • Speaking Dutch
      Speaking Dutch

      357
      7h ago
    • She wants the best
      She wants the best

      639
      10h ago
    • Combat in God of War is like painting with a brush
      Combat in God of War is like painting with a brush

      45
      47m ago
    • How to be tall
      How to be tall

      76
      1h ago
    • Give it All
      Give it All

      142
      3h ago
    • purple previous Ibex
      purple previous Ibex

      309
      7h ago
    • Kane Lives in Every Timeline. Gotta find him!
      Kane Lives in Every Timeline. Gotta find him!

      140
      4h ago
    • Crab
      Crab

      485
      10h ago
    FunnyJunk, LLC - Copyright - Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Community Guidelines - Copyright Removal Request