| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#93
-
N. Korean citizen (01/17/2013) [-]
WOOHOOO EVERYONE SHOULD HAVE GUNS 2ND AMENDMENT RIGHT AMIRITE?? Disregard teh fact that the founding fathers had no experience with weapons that could fire more than one shot without reloading, or guns that could fire accurately from more than 50ft away the second amendment totally protects your right to a weapon capable of killing a room full of people without reloading. Stay classy fj
#146 to #93
-
lordaurion ONLINE (01/17/2013) [-]
1. Most of the founding fathers were tinkerers and at that time repeating arms was one if the biggest goals of inventors. Google the "puckle gun".
2. Muskets are accurate to much more than 50ft, the rifles they had even more so.
3. Yes it does because the whole point of the amendment is to help protect the others.
2. Muskets are accurate to much more than 50ft, the rifles they had even more so.
3. Yes it does because the whole point of the amendment is to help protect the others.
>implying the founding fathers wrote the second amendment for just personal protection
Are you stupid? The guns that they had back then were the technological equivalent to our semi automatic rifles. If they had m16's back then they would have made sure to include them in the second amendment. It is the right to keep and bear arms and shall not be infringed. We have these weapons to keep a check on the government. It's just part of democracy. If you don't like it then move to somewhere where your views will be accepted, like china.
Are you stupid? The guns that they had back then were the technological equivalent to our semi automatic rifles. If they had m16's back then they would have made sure to include them in the second amendment. It is the right to keep and bear arms and shall not be infringed. We have these weapons to keep a check on the government. It's just part of democracy. If you don't like it then move to somewhere where your views will be accepted, like china.
#211 to #187
-
lordaurion ONLINE (01/17/2013) [-]
Wait, wait. I think I misunderstood who you were replying to.
Is this "just fact the founding fathers had never seen an m16 or a glock even" Comment by the anon above what you were replying to when you said " and SCOTUS is not on the side of it."?
Is this "just fact the founding fathers had never seen an m16 or a glock even" Comment by the anon above what you were replying to when you said " and SCOTUS is not on the side of it."?