| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
#354
-
jakeattack (01/14/2013) [-]
and thats the way it was supposed to be, the way we were designed, not that a smart women should be not allowed to do what she wants. but still the good old days.
That is true, the primary function off all life is to replicate.
Don't forget we're also made to adapt better than males, as we need to be able do anything to keep our offspring alive.. Maybe the need to work and not be at home is due to raise in single mothers, could be a contribution or that the world is overpopulate; so less women have come to not want kids - Of cause this could be a debate of nature vs nurture.
Could be a thesis to look into...
Don't forget we're also made to adapt better than males, as we need to be able do anything to keep our offspring alive.. Maybe the need to work and not be at home is due to raise in single mothers, could be a contribution or that the world is overpopulate; so less women have come to not want kids - Of cause this could be a debate of nature vs nurture.
Could be a thesis to look into...
True enough, but if a mother is gone to much for work there can be an effect on the child. Usually they have issue trusting because the person they are supposed to trust the most wasn't there, along with the fact that a mother (in the early years) is the biggest influence and without that influence children may miss crucial parts of development. I am not saying that a woman shouldn't work, but I do think that during the first 2 years, a mother should be given less hours at work so that they can spend time with their child so that the child will develop as it should.
I do agree, if you want children you should be there to look after them; not leave them with a Nanny.
If formulated milk wasn't invented women would have no choice to stay at home, its only logical that like you said, at least stay with the child for the first two years.
However this doesn't happen as often anymore and less women want kids and more of a career, seems that "motherly urge" is less present.
If formulated milk wasn't invented women would have no choice to stay at home, its only logical that like you said, at least stay with the child for the first two years.
However this doesn't happen as often anymore and less women want kids and more of a career, seems that "motherly urge" is less present.
Well, all we have to look at is the current generation of teenagers. Teen pregnancy is up, nobody has the respect that they should have, they don't have a lot of motivation, and the amount of alcohol and drug use is on the rise. I dunno, I just believe that parents should do what is best for their child. And at least one parent being with the child all the time (like mom works days, dad works nights). This has been quite a mental exercise.
Its nice to have general discussion, and not be told to get back into the kitchen - Thanks for that.
Yes, but teens are getting pregnant so they don't have to work.. Not for a motherly urge; that why most are on drugs and drinking and being the way they are. Which is a contribution to the fact that every "bad kid has ADHD" and they never get repercussions for their behavior and the parents just generally don't care.
The world is fucked anyways basically haha.
Yes, but teens are getting pregnant so they don't have to work.. Not for a motherly urge; that why most are on drugs and drinking and being the way they are. Which is a contribution to the fact that every "bad kid has ADHD" and they never get repercussions for their behavior and the parents just generally don't care.
The world is fucked anyways basically haha.