Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
asd
User avatar #181 - melonwaffle
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
Why does the populace need guns?

inb4 red thumbs 1) there would be no point because I have not stated an opinion
and 2) Your red thumbs makes my nipples hard
User avatar #207 to #181 - cannibislover
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
My history class just recently had a debate about this. I can't remember everything people said but many good points were made for them.
#206 to #181 - darthblam
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
The 2nd Amendment, "The right to bear arms", and such was originally put in place as a last resort protection of the people of the United State. Not protection from each other, or even other countries, but from the United States government itself should it become so ****** up that the people HAVE to do something about it for the sake of their freedom and all that.
We don't NEED guns, but in the end we need the right to them. Honestly I think this is an almost genius precaution for a country such as the U.S.

User avatar #201 to #181 - kingmarston
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
To protect ourselves from Tyrannical Governments.
User avatar #230 to #201 - jokeface
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
If a government has reached a point that you feel the need to shoot them, then they already have the resources to overpower you in terms of firearms.
User avatar #277 to #230 - jafkdb
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
That's what the British thought.
User avatar #308 to #277 - foxtrotalpha
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
The British were 3000 miles away. Also what will guns do to tanks, drones, airplanes, helicopters, and missiles?
User avatar #335 to #308 - jafkdb
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
I was just referring to the American Revolution, where a vastly outnumbered and under equipped army was able to defeat a much stronger one.

Also, if things got bad enough that there was a 2nd American Revolution, I would think that the US military would be split as well, so both sides would have some of the heavier equipment.
User avatar #233 to #230 - jokeface
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
I actually support the people's right to have guns but that was just a dumb argument for it in my opinion.
#193 to #181 - foxtrotalpha
-5 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #336 to #193 - jafkdb
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
flagged
User avatar #198 to #193 - melonwaffle
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
If you want to see ****** up dicks, click that link, you ******* cunt
#189 to #181 - fourtwentt
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
i dunno about the populace..
User avatar #186 to #181 - Riukanojutsu
Reply -1 123456789123345869
(01/13/2013) [-]
hurr durr to protect myself against other people that have guns