Awesome, have a thumb. - #80526652 added by pawnman at What? Logic? Stop that!

Reply+10

(01/13/2013)[-]

you can't shoot up a school with a bat *******

Reply-1

(01/13/2013)[-]

A man in China stabbed over 20 school children the day after the Newtown School shootings. Can't shoot up a school with anything but a gun, but thats only beacuse only guns shoot.

#255 to #220 - memberforcontent

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

None of those kids died though.

#472 to #255 - JoshBauer

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

Still happened didn't it? Over 20 kids are now probably physically and mentally scarred for life.

Ban knives! You can cut your food with spoons!

#253 to #220 - miaandvinny

Reply+1

(01/13/2013)[-]

26 people died in Newtown, 0 died in China.

#217 to #163 - pawnman

Reply-3

(01/13/2013)[-]

No but I'm sure it is pretty easy to walk through the hallways with one without anyone caring much about it. I could probably kill 3-5 people before anyone would stop me.

#218 to #217 - SirSheepy

Reply+1

(01/13/2013)[-]

but think of the possibilities with a gun

#221 to #218 - pawnman

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

I'm just saying. if guns are outlawed people can go on rampage with other means.

#222 to #221 - SirSheepy

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

true but
people kill by bat < people killed by gun
that's all im saying

#224 to #222 - pawnman

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

im commenting on your first post about not being able to shoot up a school with a bat. Even so you could still go on rampage so making guns illegal would change nothing.

It's a rebuttal on why i think guns shouldn't be illegal because it would change nothing. I know guns are better than bats.

#228 to #224 - SirSheepy

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

[rant]
first of all i never said anything about guns being illegal. i was merely stating why the picture was retarded. second of all "guns illegal would change nothing" and "I know guns are better than bats" are very contradictory. making guns illegal WOULD change a whole lot. my point is once again that it is easier to kill people with a gun that with a bat.
"Even so you could still go on rampage"? of course you could the point STILL REMAINS THAT A GUN WOULD KILL MORE PEOPLE THAN A ************* BAT. HOLY JESUS CHRIST HOW ARE YOU NOT GETTING THIS?

[/rant]

#231 to #228 - pawnman

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

Ok I'm done. didn't even read your whole comment. this is a retarded argument that i didn't plan on starting.

#252 to #231 - anon id: 33148810

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

actually he is still wrong :P
http://bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov/index.cfm?ty=tp&tid=43
although guns were (mostly) #1 with exceptions being bare hands and simple assaults, other weapons won out for almost every crime.
so yeah.
FACTS
people will use anything to commit a crime.
and yeah...taking out 20 kids with a bat in a school would be cake. no lie

#327 to #252 - anon id: 99135307

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

This link is to the 'non-fatal' section of the stats. The stats show that very few 'non-fatals' involve guns. When very few guns are involved very few people die. People still have a bad day, but its not death.

#256 to #252 - pawnman

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

Awesome, have a thumb.

#212 to #163 - auesis

Reply+5

(01/13/2013)[-]

Sounds like a challenge.

#180 to #163 - alpacaking

Reply+1

(01/13/2013)[-]

No you can't but think of all the people who own guns that don't go shooting up schools. If the people didn't have guns who says they wouldn't get a knife and stab up a school. Not all people who own guns will go on a killing spree and even if they don't have guns if a person wants to kill someone they will do it. They don't have guns in prison but criminals still manage to kill people.

#187 to #180 - SirSheepy

Reply+1

(01/13/2013)[-]

[rant]
so basically what your saying is that guns don't kill people, people kill people, right? well yes while that is technically true guns do make it a hell of a lot easier to kill people. Think of the chances of a person killing someone in a school if they had a knife instead of a gun. if someone tries to stab up a school they would probably be subdued after the first couple of kids. if he has a gun hes probably going to get more than a couple of kids. im not saying that people shouldn't own guns, because that's ******* retarded. im just saying that its easier to kill people with guns than pretty much anything else.

[/rant]

#467 to #187 - JoshBauer

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

Yeah, seriously. We should've outlawed guns hundreds of years ago!

Wait..wouldn't that mean the American Revolution never would've happened?

Guns are legal in America because we have the right to fight against our government.

The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it isn't needed until the government tries to take it away.

#493 to #467 - SirSheepy

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

didnt i just say that i thought that outlawing guns was retarded?

#494 to #493 - JoshBauer

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

You sure didn't say that not outlawing guns was retarded. You completely contradicted yourself in that comment, so I figured you're against guns.

#499 to #494 - SirSheepy

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

>im not saying that people shouldn't own guns, because that's ******* retarded. im just saying that its easier to kill people with guns than pretty much anything else.

because you obviously have trouble with long paragraphs

#503 to #499 - JoshBauer

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

>"so basically what your saying is that guns don't kill people, people kill people, right? well yes while that is technically true guns do make it a hell of a lot easier to kill people. Think of the chances of a person killing someone in a school if they had a knife instead of a gun. if someone tries to stab up a school they would probably be subdued after the first couple of kids. if he has a gun hes probably going to get more than a couple of kids."

Ok, now read the rest of your paragraph. "Guns make it so much easier to kill people!"

You're pointing out flaws with guns being legal.
You clearly have trouble with putting your opinion into words.

#517 to #503 - SirSheepy

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

i wasnt really trying to point out the flaw in guns being legal but simply trying to explain why the picture is retarded. i do have trouble forming my opinions into words a lot though.

#203 to #187 - kingmarston

Reply+3

(01/13/2013)[-]

I'm sure the British Government wished they disarmed its colonies...

#197 to #187 - alpacaking

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

Forgot to say I completely agree with you on that point.

#208 to #197 - SirSheepy

Reply-1

(01/13/2013)[-]

yay agreeing

#196 to #187 - alpacaking

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

It is much easier to kill people with guns and they probably would get subdued after a couple kids but yes people kill people. inb4 toasters don't toast toast, toast toasts toast

#202 to #196 - SirSheepy

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

and i don't disagree with that. all im saying is that guns only have one purpose: to kill. and that's what people use them for. no more no less.

people do kill people. but guns sure make it a hell of a lot easier.

by the way it's toasters don't toast toast, people toast toast

#260 to #202 - GeneralBiscuit

Reply-1

(01/13/2013)[-]

people toast bread...

#283 to #260 - SirSheepy

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

well **** me sideways

#216 to #202 - alpacaking

Reply0

(01/13/2013)[-]

Well that's not the joke though. But guns make it easier to kill people but it also makes hunting easier, personally I bow hunt because I don't see the challenge of shooting something from 400 yards away with a crazy scope. My gun is for my own personal defense because if I need to protect myself I will be able to.