| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
User avatar #98 - Yesitsme (01/13/2013) [-]
I'm all for gun rights, but this is a stupid argument.

Guns obviously aren't the only thing that you can use to kill someone, but they definetely make it a hell of a lot easier, which is why people want to have them for self-defense.

It's always possible for someone to try and grab a knife or a baseball bat and go on a killing spree, but they wouldn't get nearly as far as someone with an assault rifle would.
User avatar #100 to #98 - codyxvasco (01/13/2013) [-]
I agree. Which makes it hard for me to be as completely anti-gun control as I currently am.
#101 to #100 - gladiuss (01/13/2013) [-]
You get my thumb. I posted the picture because it illustrates the ridiculous nature of the anti-gun arguments.

Regulation is better than restriction. But I would only regulate acquisition and reselling, not ownership.
User avatar #103 to #101 - codyxvasco (01/13/2013) [-]
....Those were some nice big words.
#106 to #103 - gladiuss (01/13/2013) [-]
Made my brain hurt, I gotta tell ya. Lol!
User avatar #107 to #106 - codyxvasco (01/13/2013) [-]
...This makes me want to order a stun gun for some reason.
 Friends (0)