well it i out of context really. If you watch the hole video you will see why he asked it

apparently its not a choice, but theyre "born that way"

Clearly she was born a netflixesual with a side interest of birds. Hopefully one day they'll allow her to marry netflix movies, because otherwise her future doesn't look too bright.

They are, it just doesn't show until puberty, y'know, the same way little heterosexual boys aren't thinking about jacking off onto a pornstar's titties at the age of 6.

I used to take my mother's lingerie magazines and hump the pictures until I climaxed (no semen, but the feeling is the same). I was 5.

Because there are straight and gay chromosomes in our DNA structure and sexuality has nothing to do with our mentality.

Because children brought up in heteronormative, homophobic societies and raised by heterosexuals never turned out to be gay or bisexual.

Because society can't willingly choose to rebel against the norm of intolerance due to their DNA structure.

I think you just accidentallied the enlish language there, bro.

Anyway, if people choose their sexuality, when did you conciously choose to be heterosexual?

When I decided to stick my boner in a girls ass rather than a boys.

So, prior to that you fantasised about men and women to the same extent, and never once realised that you preferred one over the other before losing your virginity? Then, after that, you thought to yourself "Yup, I exclusively like girls now!"?

I can't remember what I did before I was twelve, faggot. Ask a girl who fucks dogs that kind of question. Does she prefer dogs over real boys now? Was she born to like dogs?

Your answer? Fuck no. If you know your biology you'd understand that, no matter how wet a woman gets over a dog, that dog cannot get that woman pregnant. THAT'S natural, and THAT'S how they were born. You take faggot jizz and needle that shit into her embryo, she'll still get pregnant. When women don't get pregnant from a guy's sperm, or when guy's sperm becomes sterile because the body recognizes he's a faggot, THEN you can tell me being gay isn't a choice.

so you lost your virginity when you were 12 years old?

What can I say, I was a little pimp back then.

By your logic, sterile people, including older women, men who have had vasectomies, women on pill and the naturally infertile are obliged to asexuality due to the fact that they can't produce children.

As to the beastiality question, those women like both men -and- dogs, the same way a heterosexual man can like both tall and short women or a bisexual person likes both men and women. Sexuality is more fluid than you think.

Oh, and once more, your statement about fluid sexuality further proves my point. If a woman can choose to like a dog and men, why the fuck is my right to be gay after 22 years of being straight being denied to me by mother fucking nature?

You've got it backwards, buddy. That's by your logic. If being gay isn't a choice, then that's what would naturally happen, because its natural. People would naturally become gay because they're sterile, or infertile. But that's not how it works, is it? Since that's so, why can't fertile people be whatever they want to be, whenever they want to be it? Being bisexual is practically the sexual orientation of choosing for pete's sake. If being gay is natural, then being bi is a total contradiction of that.

Being bi is not a case of choise either. Straight, gay, bi, asexual, whatever. None of them are choices. I'm asexual myself, though fully fertile, and I can honestly say that I've never once chosen to be this way. I never fantasised sexually about people and then one day just decided to stop and become asexual. You can choose to engage in homosexual relationships no matter what sexuality you identify as, sure, but if you're a heterosexual man who suddenly decides to fuck another dude, unless you're naturally attracted to dudes in the first place, that doesn't make you gay or bi. Your logic is really twisted, brah.

Seriously? You do realize that the term "asexual" is only a term for single cell organisms, right? No human being with a reproductive organ can be scientifically considered "asexual," I don't care if you've never had a stiff dick in your life. Even if you'll never be sexually attracted to anything, ever. But my point remains, people get hard-ons over car pipes. What the fuck does that mean? It means sexual attraction determines nothing as far as sexual orientation goes.

It. Is. A. State. Of. Mind.

An emotionally powered mechanism within your body that manipulates your hormones based on personal association with sexual things. You are conditioned towards your sexual orientation, and while it takes strong conditioning to change that, it's no different than any other mental conditioning, like political opinion or survival instincts.

You do realise that asexual is officially recognised as a sexual identity as well as a reproductive system and has been for a long time now, right?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asexuality

Bravo, you brought up Wikapedia on it.

Oh, wait, it says further down in the first few paragraphs that it's a debatable subject. Huh. I see the term "relatively new" in the same sentence as "sexual orientation."

So basically this is a Wikapedia page based on the belief that it could be a sexual orientation. Just like there's a Wikepedia page for everything. In other words, you're using common terminology that has been used for single cell organisms for as long as science has existed for something on the level of slang.

Yeah. You're asexual. I bet you're a hipster or scenefag as well.

Oh wait, you have to choose to be those things, don't you?

Anyway, I'll be cutting this little debate short right now due to the fact that it's almost 3am where I live. Ciao.

Because your sexual identity is oh so related to the music or clothing taste you enjoy, isn't it. And as a matter of fact I'm neither of those things. I could use the exact same amount of thought and depth as you to state that you're a Justin Bieber fanatic who enjoys prancing nude in the forest.

Yes. It's no different than the clothes you put on or the makeup you wear or the music you enjoy. Just a little harder to change.

I don't know why you got thumbed down for that. Your comment made total sense.
I tried to save you from red thumbs but I can only take away 1...

I don't see any red thumbs?

Oh phew. You have been saved. Last time I saw you had -2 thumbs, so I gave you one.

The comment about me saying I dont see red thumbs got -4 thumbs.

I have tried to save you more, friend.
Looks like you induced some annoying debate up there. Dang those people are all thick.
Not starting a debate here, just stating a fact.
There is nothing in chromosomes to tell you that you're gay or straight. It's a mental thing. You're not 'born this way'. It just doesn't happen.

I dont really know or care :P
gayness doesn't seem like it could possibly be a DNA thing, but it could, you never know.

It doesn't seem like it could, and that's because it isn't. :)

Maybe research on it before making claims?