| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
A pencil is used to stain paper, but it can be used to misspell words. It can also be used to stab someone in the neck with. A car is used to drive, and it can be used to drive drunk. It can also be used to run people over with. A spoon is used to get food to your mouth. It can be used too much and make you fat, and it can be used to scoop someone's eyes out. A firearm is mainly used for either personal defense, hunting, or for shooting targets, but it can be used for killing people.
Just because something can be used in a bad way doesn't mean it should be banned. Countless people are hit by cars every day, but you don't see people crying out to outlaw cars. Why guns then?
Just because something can be used in a bad way doesn't mean it should be banned. Countless people are hit by cars every day, but you don't see people crying out to outlaw cars. Why guns then?
Driving drunk is illegal. Misspelling something is a mistake that gets erased. Overeating should be illegal.
Guns meant for killing should be illegal. You can keep your hunting rifles and if you kill someone with it, at least it won't be 20 kids in under 5 minutes.
Guns meant for killing should be illegal. You can keep your hunting rifles and if you kill someone with it, at least it won't be 20 kids in under 5 minutes.
Yes, but tools that kill people are not illegal or even monitored.
If we made it so that a gun can only kill one person, instead of many at once, the lives we could save each year as a nation would be massive.
The mother of the Newtown shooter should not have had those guns in the first place, where her mentally unstable son could easily access.
If we made it so that a gun can only kill one person, instead of many at once, the lives we could save each year as a nation would be massive.
The mother of the Newtown shooter should not have had those guns in the first place, where her mentally unstable son could easily access.
So you're saying that if everyone had a gun, the person with the quickest gun gets the kill?
Your logic makes no sense. There is no need to have an AK-47. Nor do we need to arm and train TODDLERS in gun use, that's just asking for war in middle school.
You keep your hunting rifles and if you're lucky, kill only half a dozen people. You keep your semi and full automatics and kill three times that. This law wouldn't stop criminals, but that doesn't matter considering that if someone wants to kill you bad enough they'll always find a way, even if you're armed to the teeth.
It would stop the woman from Newtown from having the guns which her son then used to kill 20 little kids. It would prevent the two teenage boys from Columbine from getting easy access to guns.
Your logic makes no sense. There is no need to have an AK-47. Nor do we need to arm and train TODDLERS in gun use, that's just asking for war in middle school.
You keep your hunting rifles and if you're lucky, kill only half a dozen people. You keep your semi and full automatics and kill three times that. This law wouldn't stop criminals, but that doesn't matter considering that if someone wants to kill you bad enough they'll always find a way, even if you're armed to the teeth.
It would stop the woman from Newtown from having the guns which her son then used to kill 20 little kids. It would prevent the two teenage boys from Columbine from getting easy access to guns.
Ban guns which are designed only to kill, but allow hunting rifles/ectera that are designed for actual sport (if you can call it that.)
I'm not saying ban all guns either, that would be impossible. I'm just saying limit guns as a preventative measure, like they do with knives.
I'm not saying ban all guns either, that would be impossible. I'm just saying limit guns as a preventative measure, like they do with knives.
an atom bomb can be used as a means to save us from meteorites and other comets but it can also kill people, lets give everybody an atom bomb. nobody would need a firearm to protect themselves from firearms if there were no firearms. but that said, i'm not even against guns. me and my pop go hunting for christmas every year. but i think the US is way too loose with their gun laws, i mean who needs an AK47 to hunt?
#549 to #538
-
alexusapi (01/07/2013) [-]
i just realized it isnt xD here is the website www.americanstyle.is/#