Upload
Login or register
Anonymous comments allowed.
#238 - daxxthedog
Reply +24
(01/06/2013) [-]
#403 to #238 - alexusapi
Reply +7
(01/06/2013) [-]
a pencils purpose is not to misspell, a cars purpose is not to drive drunk and once a again a spoons purpose is not to make people fat, but a guns purpose is to kill.

#526 to #403 - revanthewin
Reply -1
(01/06/2013) [-]
A pencil is used to stain paper, but it can be used to misspell words. It can also be used to stab someone in the neck with. A car is used to drive, and it can be used to drive drunk. It can also be used to run people over with. A spoon is used to get food to your mouth. It can be used too much and make you fat, and it can be used to scoop someone's eyes out. A firearm is mainly used for either personal defense, hunting, or for shooting targets, but it can be used for killing people.

Just because something can be used in a bad way doesn't mean it should be banned. Countless people are hit by cars every day, but you don't see people crying out to outlaw cars. Why guns then?
#713 to #526 - elcreepo
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Driving drunk is illegal. Misspelling something is a mistake that gets erased. Overeating should be illegal.

Guns meant for killing should be illegal. You can keep your hunting rifles and if you kill someone with it, at least it won't be 20 kids in under 5 minutes.
#720 to #713 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Driving drunk is illegal, killing people is illegal.
#744 to #720 - elcreepo
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Yes, but tools that kill people are not illegal or even monitored.

If we made it so that a gun can only kill one person, instead of many at once, the lives we could save each year as a nation would be massive.

The mother of the Newtown shooter should not have had those guns in the first place, where her mentally unstable son could easily access.
#757 to #744 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
But there's no way to make it to where a gun could only kill one person unless everyone had a gun. The fact that you can fire it more than once quickly is kind of why people use guns instead of bows and arrows.
#773 to #757 - elcreepo
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
So you're saying that if everyone had a gun, the person with the quickest gun gets the kill?

Your logic makes no sense. There is no need to have an AK-47. Nor do we need to arm and train TODDLERS in gun use, that's just asking for war in middle school.

You keep your hunting rifles and if you're lucky, kill only half a dozen people. You keep your semi and full automatics and kill three times that. This law wouldn't stop criminals, but that doesn't matter considering that if someone wants to kill you bad enough they'll always find a way, even if you're armed to the teeth.

It would stop the woman from Newtown from having the guns which her son then used to kill 20 little kids. It would prevent the two teenage boys from Columbine from getting easy access to guns.
#776 to #773 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Wait, are we arguing the same point now? I'm trying to say that banning all guns wouldn't work. What are you trying to say?
#788 to #776 - elcreepo
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Ban guns which are designed only to kill, but allow hunting rifles/ectera that are designed for actual sport (if you can call it that.)

I'm not saying ban all guns either, that would be impossible. I'm just saying limit guns as a preventative measure, like they do with knives.
#796 to #788 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Oh, then I guess I agree with you. People shouldn't need to own anything other than a shotgun, a hunting rifle or a pistol, but guns shouldn't be illegal.
#543 to #526 - alexusapi
Reply +4
(01/07/2013) [-]
an atom bomb can be used as a means to save us from meteorites and other comets but it can also kill people, lets give everybody an atom bomb. nobody would need a firearm to protect themselves from firearms if there were no firearms. but that said, i'm not even against guns. me and my pop go hunting for christmas every year. but i think the US is way too loose with their gun laws, i mean who needs an AK47 to hunt?
#554 to #543 - revanthewin
Reply -1
(01/07/2013) [-]
What if you see six deer and you wanna kill them all? I mean, I don't know about you, but I'm no Lee Harvey Oswald.
#560 to #554 - alexusapi
Reply +1
(01/07/2013) [-]
Ok you win, if i happen to need to kill 6 deer at once, having an AK-47 would be a convenience. because thats a rational and completely valid argument.
#563 to #560 - revanthewin
Reply -1
(01/07/2013) [-]
Or if three bears came at you at once. Are you just gonna try to club the other two after shooting one?
#575 to #563 - admiralen
Reply +2
(01/07/2013) [-]
.44 magnum friendo, six bullets with enough force to kill the bear
#581 to #575 - revanthewin
Reply -1
(01/07/2013) [-]
But then what if there's seven?
#586 to #581 - admiralen
Reply +1
(01/07/2013) [-]
thats why you own two
#590 to #586 - revanthewin
Reply -1
(01/07/2013) [-]
But what if there's fifteen?
#595 to #590 - admiralen
Reply +2
(01/07/2013) [-]
thats why you learned to wrestle bears in highschool
#601 to #595 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
But admiralen,...What if the last one's horny?!
#608 to #601 - admiralen
Reply +2
(01/07/2013) [-]
#611 to #608 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
But what if it's a girl?!?!?!?!?!?
But what if it's a girl?!?!?!?!?!?
#619 to #611 - admiralen
Reply +2
(01/07/2013) [-]
call roman and he´ll bowl with it
#759 to #619 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
Wow, someone came through and thumbed down every one of my comments. I feel honored.
#622 to #619 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
But what if Roman wins and the bear get's pissed off?!
#780 to #622 - admiralen
Reply +1
(01/07/2013) [-]
then roman shoots it down with his uzi since hes an outlaw and its no longer your problem
#785 to #780 - revanthewin
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
But now he has an illegal weapon!
#898 to #785 - admiralen
Reply +1
(01/07/2013) [-]
but its ok since roman is a criminal anyway
#440 to #403 - ojallday
Reply -2
(01/06/2013) [-]
yes, true but you can use literally anything to kill any one
#466 to #440 - alexusapi
Reply +1
(01/06/2013) [-]
ok let's have a 1v1 fight, you get a toothpick and i get an AR-15 :)
ok let's have a 1v1 fight, you get a toothpick and i get an AR-15 :)
#478 to #466 - ojallday
Reply 0
(01/06/2013) [-]
Okey... ill wait till you're asleep then i'll tie you down and beat you too death. then ill go to Mcdonalds and get an egg mcmuffin.
Okey... ill wait till you're asleep then i'll tie you down and beat you too death. then ill go to Mcdonalds and get an egg mcmuffin.
#484 to #478 - alexusapi
Reply 0
(01/06/2013) [-]
Awww man, we here in iceland lost our mcdonalds some years ago, not like a ridiculous loss but still, when you don't have it you miss it :P
Awww man, we here in iceland lost our mcdonalds some years ago, not like a ridiculous loss but still, when you don't have it you miss it :P
#515 to #484 - ojallday
Reply 0
(01/06/2013) [-]
... what do you have?
#529 to #515 - alexusapi
Reply 0
(01/06/2013) [-]
Well my favorite is probably subway, but we have dominos,pizza hut, tgi fridays, american style, kfc and probably some more i cant remember. so it's not like our situation is bad :P
#538 to #529 - ojallday
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
what is American Style?
what is American Style?
#549 to #538 - alexusapi
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
i just realized it isnt xD here is the website You need to login to view this link
#584 to #549 - ojallday
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
yaaaaaaa... thats not in english soo i dont think i can navigate that. does it say where the company is based?
#600 to #584 - alexusapi
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
nevermind, it's icelandic, just a very misleading name and theme.
#546 to #538 - alexusapi
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
a restraunt very much like T.G.I Fridays. i thought that came from america :P
#555 to #546 - ojallday
Reply 0
(01/07/2013) [-]
nope never herd of it unless its from the north. those ******* are wierd
#253 to #238 - miaandvinny
Reply +1
(01/06/2013) [-]
And bombs blow people up.