How to Math. . 90% of math graduates can' t solve this equation. this equation cannot be true and cant be solved fc
Upload
Login or register
Hide Comments
Leave a comment Refresh Comments (244)
[ 244 comments ]
> hey anon, wanna give your opinion?
asd
User avatar #26 - amegaara
Reply +62 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
this equation cannot be true and cant be solved
#44 to #26 - jazpinder
-6 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #46 to #44 - amegaara
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
nope check my comment below for the answer
#29 to #26 - anon id: b9852f65
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
y = infinity
User avatar #30 to #29 - amegaara
Reply +9 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
no then we could do:

y - y = 2 as in ∞ - ∞ = 2 and all math is ******
User avatar #107 to #30 - Soundtrack
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
ah yes, good point.


#36 to #30 - anon id: 8e66d0fc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
would it not be _ i -i = 0_
because when you add or substract a number from_ i_ it's value still stays the same
but when you substract the same value throughout i
it will become nothing aka 0
User avatar #42 to #36 - amegaara
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
what?
what i did is subtract y from both ends of the equation to make y-y=whatever
and when i did that i became infinity minus infinity equals 2 which is wrong which is why this mo fo has no solution
User avatar #101 to #42 - worstposter
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
infinity minus infinity is in fact not 0, it can be anything you like, really.
lets say ∞ +2 = ∞, which is true
> ∞ - ∞ = 2
> 2*(∞ - ∞) = 2*(2)
> ∞ - ∞ = 4
therefore we can also say that infinity minus infinity equals infinity. because infinity plus infinity is still infinity. Its an irrational number.
#1 - quietbrony
Reply +49 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Accidently learning math on internet
Accidently learning math on internet
#125 to #1 - theholum
0 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #126 to #125 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
unlucky brah, at least you tried.
User avatar #91 to #1 - wiredguy
Reply +8 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
I don't understand what you mean.

There's nothing here to learn, just gibbering and a somewhat clever dick joke.
User avatar #105 to #91 - quietbrony
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
im not serious, i said that because i actually wasn't learn math on the internet, just nonsense math, my use of reverse sarcasm was displaying my false stupidity, hence with the hoped result of creating laughter. Its quite complex humor really, im not surprised you are baffled.
#116 to #105 - wiredguy
Reply +7 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Your lame undertaking to confound me is evidence enough that you are not as of yet fully aware of my country of origin.
I am an Englishman, you see.
While the plashet of melatonin that once was known as my cerebrum has indeed been encumbered with your nebula of deceit, I see now the ironic sarcasm in your statement and stand up fully to accept the extent of my deserved ignominy.

My affluence of intellect has been stripped from me and I am left indigent of cerebral power in your eyes.
I only hope my considerable essay at making my vocabulary as eclectic as your own will make up for my shortcoming.

I extol your innovative use of ironic sarcasm, and I bid you good day.
#123 to #116 - quietbrony
Reply +2 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
I too am a brit, and thank you for such a timely response, i admire the flair in your writing.
That second statement was also a joke, due too my humorous and clearly false explanation. I hope you had a jolly good laugh.
I am quite the punster today.
Good day.
#145 to #123 - sixroller **User deleted account**
+2 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #152 to #145 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
hey notsixroller, this is songofstorms new account, i know you fellow brit!
#155 to #152 - sixroller **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #158 to #155 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Im fakin good m8.
just 'ad a blady wank.

where in angleterre do you live?
#162 to #158 - sixroller **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #164 to #162 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
SO LUCKKYYYY.
i want to live there, im from the ******* of england, London..
#168 to #164 - sixroller **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #176 to #168 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
what do you like about IOW

id love to live in newport mate.
User avatar #173 to #168 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
LOL nothing.
it has some nice shops. Its a melting pot of humans from all cultures, ( yet a few white people still look at me and immediatly cross the road, then cross again when i turn around to look).

thats about it.
london is so overrated.
I just realised IOW is a quarter of the size of london alone.. thats ******* awesome.
#178 to #173 - sixroller **User deleted account**
+1 123456789123345869
has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #181 to #178 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
speak soon m8 :3
#131 to #123 - wiredguy
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
I did have such an inkling, it is good to see!   
And I thank you most profoundly for your complements.   
   
Pfffffffffffffffffenough.   
Y'right m8?   
Nice jokes, and yeh I did catch the second one, but as I said (if you caught it, something to do with melatonin) I'm pretty ******* shattered and not up to much more.   
'Ave a good one! ^^
I did have such an inkling, it is good to see!
And I thank you most profoundly for your complements.

Pfffffffffffffffffenough.
Y'right m8?
Nice jokes, and yeh I did catch the second one, but as I said (if you caught it, something to do with melatonin) I'm pretty ******* shattered and not up to much more.
'Ave a good one! ^^
User avatar #137 to #131 - quietbrony
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
yeah ate, 15 past 11, im fakin knackered, but ive got a metal gear solid 2 too play, so yeah.
anyway, sleep well bruv, take care.
User avatar #150 to #137 - wiredguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Hah, 'n' you, when you nod off.
Nighty.
#88 - flyslasher
Reply +28 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
y + 2 = y
2 = y - y
2 = 0
( 2 != 0 )
No Solution
#102 to #88 - anon id: f31482ab
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
I think any solutions people found use cheats. (besides yours)
I thought of function, but the problem isn't written as such. [ f(y)=y+2 ]
#122 to #102 - anon id: d552e95b
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
No need since Y is the only variable you know you are trying to find Y therefor this man is correct.
User avatar #167 to #88 - babyanalraper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Well, infinity = infinity + 2.
#169 to #167 - skybluetroll
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
No.
User avatar #190 to #169 - babyanalraper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
Are you really really sure about that? Would you please provide proof for that statement? You know, even an infinity + an infinity = an infinity. And then there are infinities of different sizes as well. For instance, an infinity made of all rational numbers is smaller than an infinity made of all irrational numbers, but all infinities composed only of rational numbers are equally big. Therefore, an infinity + 2 (rational) = an infinity.
User avatar #246 to #190 - seylorm
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
but if we change your equation to the following: "2 = an infinity - an infinity"
so, no matter what these infinitys are they both have to be the same and therefore if you subtract them you'll get 0 and then the equation is "2 = 0" which isn't true so the answer is that there is no solution.
User avatar #267 to #246 - babyanalraper
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
Actually, it would be (2 + an infinity) - an infinity = 0, which is completely correct.
#270 to #267 - flyslasher
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/06/2013) [-]
Infinity is the concept that a number is growing larger, so infinity/2 or infinity*2 or infinity+25 or infinity-1351321698654 are still equal to infinity. But nowhere in the original equation do we ever talk about infinity...
#28 - simeonc
Reply +11 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Rearrange
Y = Y + 2
Programmers thinking:-
2, 4, 6, 8 etc

problem?
User avatar #99 to #28 - wiredguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
main()
{

char subject;
cin >> subject;

if (subject = "programming") {
cout << "Good work soldier!" << endl;
}
else {
cout << "Keep your filthy programming out of this, it ain't relevant." << endl;
}
return 0;
}
User avatar #204 to #99 - asmodeu
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
I'll take that and raise it up a bit:

typedef struct subjectlist
{ char letter;
subject
list *next; }

int main ()
{ const char subject = "programming";
subjectlist *compare;
subject
list *root;


dglfdlfd af
df l;gl slh p
fa df;a' df
a a;g ds;h;gd#s;h gfsh tsyoh kos[rth s
fd'glfsd

dfdajpfijadpi gjpsg pdksogh

return -1;}

I would advise against compiling this code though.
User avatar #209 to #204 - wiredguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
Oh god what the **** x3

I just learned a bit of code as a personal project once, I have no idea what any of the sensical things there mean, let alone the (I presume) nonsensical parts.
User avatar #215 to #209 - asmodeu
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
In order to fully understand the complexity of linked lists you will have to compile and run (multiple times if needed) the following code:

do {beer;}
while (sober);
User avatar #221 to #215 - wiredguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
And then I realised do-while was a loop.

Well I'll be killing myself now.
User avatar #218 to #215 - wiredguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
You could have just looped it, but it's understandable you didn't want to take the effort x3

And just, for clarification.
Do action "beer" (to drink a beer) while "sober = 1" (1 being true) right?
User avatar #228 to #218 - asmodeu
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
Yes. Usually loops require something to be transformed into a boolean value {0,1}. When sober=0, the program may chose to stop looping "beer". Though it doesn't work for all compilers that way. Some end up in an alcoholic coma in hospital.
User avatar #243 to #228 - wiredguy
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
Nicely put, 10/10
#106 to #28 - simeonc
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
this only applies if there's a loop, otherwise its just 2
User avatar #163 to #28 - thumbsalad
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Y += 2;

Would be much more efficient though..
User avatar #62 - thelordofrepost
Reply +10 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Y is a letter. It cannot be added to a number.
User avatar #72 to #62 - kinglobster
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
y is a variable taking place of a number
#74 to #72 - thelordofrepost
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
#75 to #74 - kinglobster
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
User avatar #195 - thewalruss
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
actually, Y = ∞...

∞ + 2 = ∞

By the way, that is not a infinity simbol... those are boobs.
#193 - jamesrustler
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
I read in the comments that it can't be solved because it's a meaningless equation.    
   
God damn I wish I was smart enough to understand **** like this.
I read in the comments that it can't be solved because it's a meaningless equation.

God damn I wish I was smart enough to understand **** like this.
#174 - predalien
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/05/2013) [-]
**predalien rolled a random image posted in comment #17 at Racist Barn Racist Barn 1 2 3 4 ** mfw
User avatar #40 - therianek
Reply -5 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Imo i would use derivation on this...
y+2=y
first derivation:
f(x) : y+2 = y
f(x)' : 1 = 1
because derivation from y is 1 and derivation from 2 is 0

Problem solved
User avatar #45 to #40 - kikisu
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
A derivative, put simply, is how fast an equation is changing. The derivative of y=3x is dy/dx=3 because y is changing by 3 every time x changes. The derivative doesn't say anything about the actual solution to the original equation the way you're doing it. You're just proving that the rate at which y is changing is equal to the rate at which y is changing. Plus the way you did it was wrong because you don't know the derivative of y, so what you really would have is y'=y'.
#47 to #40 - quarklion
Reply +6 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
Except that didn't really solve it, since you didn't even adress the equation itself.
You didn't even try to adress it as an equation. Equations are solved by finding the values of the variable(commonly x, but here it's y) for which both sides are equal.
Functions on the other hand is finding the output for different values of x.
An example of an equation is 2+x=2x with the solution being x=2. Equations can exist for which there is multiple solutions. An example is 1=x^2 with both x=1 and -1 being valid answers
An example of a function is f(x)=3x+7 with there being a different output for each value of x. Functions can exist where certain values of x is invalid. An example is f(x)=1/x with x=0 being invalid.
As a sidenote f(x) means function of x, so for your invalid attempt you should've written f(y).

Also my "attempt" at solving this.
y+2=y
2=y-y
2=0
No valid answer.
User avatar #48 to #47 - kikisu
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
He should have left the f(x) part out all together. The y+2=2 is all the notation you need.
#50 to #48 - quarklion
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
I know that equations don't use that kind of notation, but just because the mistake would've been removed if he correctly adressed it as an equation instead of a function, does not mean that the mistake shouldn't be pointed out.
User avatar #51 to #47 - therianek
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
allright... i am not math guy... it just came to my mind, thanks for the info
#79 - cheezitman
Reply +5 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
I guess I'm going to have to solve it sometime...

1y+2=1y (the reason I put 1y instead of y is because it is easier to solve)
Subtract 1y from both sides
2=0y
Divide by 0 on both sides
2/0=y
since you can't divide by zero it isn't possible
so y=Undefined
#80 to #79 - anon id: 0e819688
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
nope...
y+2=y
-y -y
2=0

Ø
User avatar #92 to #80 - mublerking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
you know in order to properly do this you separate it into left side and right side that way at no point will you have anything equal to something it isn't.
essentially:

LS. | RS.
y+2 | y

therefor LS =/= RS
Q.E.D.

At least in his method he put that y = 2/0 which is the next most correct answer.
User avatar #135 to #92 - gardenmanly
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
"LS =/= RS"

but... the left side does equal the right side... that's how equations work
User avatar #142 to #135 - mublerking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
so youre telling me y+2 = y, that the right side IS equal to the left? which isn't actually possible except in the imaginary (so in this context its not possible because we're working as elements of the real number system)

y+2=/=y
y+2=y+2
User avatar #149 to #142 - gardenmanly
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
ah ****... I accidentally the whole thing...

forgive me, my brain went to mush, I thought you just meant in a proper equation, the left side does not equal the right side. I didn't know you meant this specifically and forgot that when solving things algebraically you do separate the sides.
User avatar #156 to #149 - mublerking
Reply +1 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
its okay, happens to the best of us.
User avatar #148 to #142 - mublerking
Reply 0 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]
if we can always work in the imaginary numbers when discussing LS and RS then in theory every left side is equal to every right side.
#82 to #79 - ItsJustChase
Reply +3 123456789123345869
(01/04/2013) [-]