| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
But. BUT. If anakin didn't have a lightsaber, would he have "found a way" to murder every human being in the jedi temple? Easily?
Also lightsabers were given to select few in the galaxy. They weren't available to be handed out to everyone on a planet.
Also lightsabers were given to select few in the galaxy. They weren't available to be handed out to everyone on a planet.
when the "few" can kill 20 people in one go, it is not about the rights of gun ownership anymore, it's about the rights to drop your kids safely at school without worrying about madmen shooting them up. i've lived in two countries where guns are banned, and both have really low homicide numbers, i don't see why nobody owning a gun would be an issue.
It would have been more difficult for him. So much more difficult, perhaps, that he wouldn't have tried. Now, you could say:"he was told to, he would have done it anyway". but doesn't that make HIM the weapon? And therefore not to blame, but instead, palpatine?