praise be to bacon

but over here, where guns are illegal, we never have shootings. occasional gang things where they take out about one guy maybe, but nothing like in the US. That said now that every man and his dog has an assault rifle I think you've kind of shot your self in the foot with it, your stuck, cant completely get rid of them.


heh, shot yourself in the foot.

if we give everyone guns, and have everyone shoot themselves, there won't be anyone left to commit a mass murder!

IT'S THE PERFECT PLAN!

I followed that tinyurl.
For some reason "The Daily Anarchist: Building a voluntary society... without permission" doesn't seem like a reliable source.
(GIF unrelated)

Right, because a kindergartner is gonna pull out his fucking AK-47 and mow down the assailant before he does any damage.

I hate the fucking idiots who are like "hurr ban guns they are bad if they are banned, surely criminals will listen and won't be able to get them!"
No, you fucking idiot, a criminal can get a gun easy as can be. If I haven't already turned you off with logic, here are some ideas I'm gonna cram down your throat:

1. We aren't England- This isn't anything to do with the fact that we don't suck, it's that we aren't an island nation who can control every bit of import and export. They have less than half of the US's citizens, and they haven't been armed for a longer time, not to mention that they live on a small island. We are bordered on both sides by 2 large nations who both either have lots of guns or cannot control their current populace full of guns.

2. The 2nd Amendment- No I'm not gonna say the found fathers ever envisioned me owning a rifle accurate out to 1500m that can take out light skinned vehicles, but I can say that it talks about the right for each state to have a well-regulated milita. If you don't have the same weapons, if not better weapons than the nation we are facing, then we aren't considered well-armed. On top of this, if you don't own a gun, you are in the state, but aren't well regulated. Technically, NOT owning a gun makes you a burden on your state if someone were ever to invade.

TL;DR: "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin

MFW i live in a country with less than 1 murder per year

No doubt the shooting could have been avoided entirely if those 5 year old kids had been armed

>fully support the right to own firearms
>also fully support the idea that there needs to be strict rules and regulations that go with that
>see this mass shooting on the news and think how every anti-gun iberal is going to milk this as an excuse to ban guns from good citizens
>go online and see how everyone is against that, and says that banning guns wont do diddly shit
>my face when I dont feel like some redneck promoting gun rights anymore

"So this one guy over here raped a few people, we've decided that to prevent this from happening in the future by putting a ban on penises. All penis owners need to report to clinics to have their penises removed."

Sure maybe you've prevent one or two rapes but if someone really wanted to rape someone they could easily buy a strap-on, or then could use dildo's, hairbrushes, certain fruits and vegetables, shampoo bottles.

I live in Canada, and we have some pretty strict gun laws (that recently were made somewhat light with the removal of the long gun registry, thank god) and you know what good it did? None! It did basically nothing but cost billions in tax money to keep and and criminalize law abiding citizens. Owning a gun during the registry days was basically giving up your privacy right, police could stop by whenever the fuck they wanted to look around and check how your guns were doing, and fine/arrest you if they weren't "stored properly." It was like something out of fucking Orwell man. And it prevented no death what so ever because if someone seriously wanted to kill someone else, they used their brains and used something else to do it or bought a gun illegally.

I live in the UK, where guns are illegal, and I would be bloody terrified if I knew that any random person could be carrying a gun.

The whole "gun control" debate falls on it's face the second critical thinking is applied. If you make guns illegal you're only taking them out of the hands of the people who are obeying the law. They're the one's who need them to begin with. Criminals, by definition break the law. If you think laws are going to stop them you're dangerously out of touch.

inb4 "people will hurt themselves with guns" That's the fault of gun control advocates. They make guns taboo so people never lean how to properly use them. Then when they have to they end up harming themselves. Take a trip to the South, they know wtf they're doing. They teach their kids gun safety and how to shoot. The kids that go off accidentally shooting people are the ones who's parents keep them hidden, then they find them and think it's a toy.

Gun shitstorm below

Then train your goddamn police. Idiots.


Or simply get rid of the police altogether and arm all of the civilians. I'd love to see America do that.

Srsly. Not completely against bearing arms, but this is one goddamn ridiculous and stupid argument. Peacekeepers for the official peace-keepers.

Average shootings per square kilometer a year in a country where guns are legal: 0.03
Average shootings per square kilometer a year in a country where guns are illegal: 0.00004


70% of all statistics are made up..


now you don't know what to believe anymore..