Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #3 - samuraicrack (12/13/2012) [-]
This is flawed. When you clone something it has to grow up. it wouldn't be born at the age of 50 (or what ever the scientist ages are).
User avatar #70 to #3 - gimmeyobabies (12/13/2012) [-]
Well then we could have tons of baby fights.
User avatar #21 to #3 - ericbeagles (12/13/2012) [-]
What if it's a different type of cloning, and you can just walk into the machine then your clone self is all like "Sup, I'm you but different"?
User avatar #12 to #3 - galacticboner (12/13/2012) [-]
Actually, they're born as babies (of course), but if the cloned individual is 50 when he is cloned, then the baby will be born with 50 year old cells.
#98 to #12 - wimwam (12/13/2012) [-]
....no, not really. 50 year old DNA (the first strands, but that is split and replicated so even that isn't true for long)
0
#134 to #98 - deadrifler has deleted their comment [-]
0
#136 to #134 - deadrifler has deleted their comment [-]
#5 to #3 - adamks ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
Who says they didn't make two genetically similar kids in two different women and letting the grow up?
User avatar #8 to #5 - samuraicrack (12/13/2012) [-]
Because they look exactly the same age as the originals.
#9 to #8 - adamks ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
The exact same genes?
User avatar #26 to #9 - myuu (12/13/2012) [-]
They would still have faults with their environmental factors, diet, exercise, and things like scars would all change the way the clones look.
User avatar #41 to #26 - samuraicrack (12/13/2012) [-]
Finally, somebody who gets it.
 Friends (0)