The Hobbit. Tags are a black father.. uhm. If CD“. How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
Click to expand


What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#32 - Bova (12/12/2012) [+] (6 replies)
How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
User avatar #43 - YoshiBond (12/12/2012) [+] (5 replies)
#3 - zzonked (12/12/2012) [-]
People didn't believe in Sam and Frodo but they pulled it off.

"Is there any hope, Gandalf, for THE HOBBIT SERIES?

There never was much hope. Just a fool's hope. "
#174 - bslsk (12/13/2012) [+] (10 replies)

I already have the movie.

You're so jelly I could spread you on toast I just know it.
#125 - bosszefronposter (12/13/2012) [+] (1 reply)
The Hobbit is a smaller book, but it's also much denser. More happens in a smaller amount of time. Spreading it out into three movies will allow Peter Jackson to include everything he wants to. Everyone always bitches when movies based on books are released that not everything was included. They're giving us what we've been asking for, and you're still bitching.
#65 - appleyjack **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#349 - ljxjlos (12/13/2012) [-]
3 Movies you say? Still counts as one...
#121 - shazmothree (12/13/2012) [-]

I'm so angry that they'll include as much as they can from the book by making three movies
#72 - EmulateSnes ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
This image has expired
If Peter Jackson can do to the hobbit what he Did with Lord of the rings...
I have absolutely no Problem here.
#321 - anonymoose (12/13/2012) [+] (2 replies)
The Hobbit is trying to keep as much of the book in it as possible. LOTR left out a **** load, including one of my favourite characters, Tom Bombadil. The Tolkien books have enough detail in each of them to make 3 movies each.

Plus the Hobbit movie isn't 100% the Hobbit, it has extracts from other books, most likely the Silmarillion, which details Gandalfs adventures when he leaves the group.
#154 - clockworkhearts (12/13/2012) [+] (8 replies)
I think you might be forgetting something.
#145 - ColdBeets (12/13/2012) [-]
More Middle-Earth=More Awesome.
More Middle-Earth=More Awesome.
User avatar #189 - noopinion (12/13/2012) [+] (5 replies)
Then don't whine about how they miss detail if you don't want 9 hours of the film.
#148 - iamnewhere (12/13/2012) [+] (2 replies)
This image has expired

I don't give a flying **** about how much money he makes, they are ******* worth it.

In fact, i wish he made 3 movies for each book just to get all the details, because we're reeeally missing out on some cool **** , like Tom Bombadil and the Barrow Downs, and the ******* old forest and Old man willow!

******* hell....
#137 - schnofi (12/13/2012) [+] (1 reply)
If it were only about the money he wouldn't take this whole thing serious. He'd be all like "Meh just some childish fantasy **** "

But no, he took it serious and he perfectly put the best ******* adventure that has ever been shown to mankind on screen.
God I can't wait for the Hobbit. Plus I am going to see it with the gal of my dreams. Wish me luck for this month FJ...I sure need it...
#338 - snakefire (12/13/2012) [+] (1 reply)
#213 - mausbaus (12/13/2012) [-]
mfw description
mfw description
#130 - feelythefeel ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
And that's bad how?
And that's bad how?
User avatar #356 - klaatu (12/13/2012) [-]
Anything that keeps me in Middle-earth longer I consider a good thing.
User avatar #302 - dashdashdash (12/13/2012) [+] (9 replies)
Okay, umm so,
1-The lotr trilogy is actually NOT a trilogy, it was seperated into 3 movies, 'cause nobody would want to see a 9 hour film
2-The lotr films could've easily been 6 films with the amount of content the books have!
3-In the Hobbit films, ONLY the first 2 are based on the actual BOOK, the third is based on 120 pages of notes that Tolkien wrote AFTER the return of the king!
4-The Hobbit book DOES infact have enough content for 2 films!
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)