The Hobbit. Tags are a black father.. uhm. If CD“. How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a 6% commission on everything you buy.

The Hobbit

Tags are a black father.

uhm. If CD“
...
+2822
Views: 74802
Favorited: 105
Submitted: 12/12/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to Hoodnasty E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(329):

[ 329 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#32 - Bova (12/12/2012) [+] (6 replies)
How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
How can we complain? We get more movies and more Middle-Earth!
User avatar #43 - YoshiBond ONLINE (12/12/2012) [+] (5 replies)
SPOILER: BILBO SURVIVES HIS UNEXPECTED JOURNEY
#3 - zzonked (12/12/2012) [-]
People didn't believe in Sam and Frodo but they pulled it off.

"Is there any hope, Gandalf, for THE HOBBIT SERIES?

There never was much hope. Just a fool's hope. "
#174 - bslsk (12/13/2012) [+] (10 replies)


I already have the movie.


You're so jelly I could spread you on toast I just know it.
#125 - bosszefronposter (12/13/2012) [+] (1 reply)
The Hobbit is a smaller book, but it's also much denser. More happens in a smaller amount of time. Spreading it out into three movies will allow Peter Jackson to include everything he wants to. Everyone always bitches when movies based on books are released that not everything was included. They're giving us what we've been asking for, and you're still bitching.
+34
#65 - appleyjack **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [+] (1 reply)
#349 - ljxjlos (12/13/2012) [-]
3 Movies you say? Still counts as one...
#121 - shazmothree (12/13/2012) [-]






I'm so angry that they'll include as much as they can from the book by making three movies
#72 - EmulateSnes (12/13/2012) [-]
This image has expired
If Peter Jackson can do to the hobbit what he Did with Lord of the rings...
I have absolutely no Problem here.
#321 - anonymoose ONLINE (12/13/2012) [+] (2 replies)
The Hobbit is trying to keep as much of the book in it as possible. LOTR left out a **** load, including one of my favourite characters, Tom Bombadil. The Tolkien books have enough detail in each of them to make 3 movies each.

Plus the Hobbit movie isn't 100% the Hobbit, it has extracts from other books, most likely the Silmarillion, which details Gandalfs adventures when he leaves the group.
#154 - clockworkhearts (12/13/2012) [+] (8 replies)
I think you might be forgetting something.
#145 - ColdBeets (12/13/2012) [-]
More Middle-Earth=More Awesome.
More Middle-Earth=More Awesome.
User avatar #189 - noopinion (12/13/2012) [+] (5 replies)
Then don't whine about how they miss detail if you don't want 9 hours of the film.
#148 - iamnewhere (12/13/2012) [+] (2 replies)
This image has expired
You're COMPLAINING?

I don't give a flying **** about how much money he makes, they are ******* worth it.

In fact, i wish he made 3 movies for each book just to get all the details, because we're reeeally missing out on some cool **** , like Tom Bombadil and the Barrow Downs, and the ******* old forest and Old man willow!

******* hell....
#137 - schnofi (12/13/2012) [+] (1 reply)
If it were only about the money he wouldn't take this whole thing serious. He'd be all like "Meh just some childish fantasy **** "

But no, he took it serious and he perfectly put the best ******* adventure that has ever been shown to mankind on screen.
God I can't wait for the Hobbit. Plus I am going to see it with the gal of my dreams. Wish me luck for this month FJ...I sure need it...
#338 - snakefire (12/13/2012) [+] (1 reply)
#213 - mausbaus (12/13/2012) [-]
mfw description
mfw description
#130 - feelythefeel ONLINE (12/13/2012) [-]
And that's bad how?
And that's bad how?
User avatar #302 - dashdashdash (12/13/2012) [+] (9 replies)
Okay, umm so,
1-The lotr trilogy is actually NOT a trilogy, it was seperated into 3 movies, 'cause nobody would want to see a 9 hour film
2-The lotr films could've easily been 6 films with the amount of content the books have!
3-In the Hobbit films, ONLY the first 2 are based on the actual BOOK, the third is based on 120 pages of notes that Tolkien wrote AFTER the return of the king!
4-The Hobbit book DOES infact have enough content for 2 films!
5-I WOULD ******* WATCH A 9-HOURS FILM OF HOBBITS DOING NOTHING BUT ******* SMOKING!
#22 - anonymous (12/12/2012) [+] (6 replies)
The reason they are making three is because the Hobbit took place over a period of over a year. The whole tale was a tale of THERE AND BACK AGAIN, meaning they need a movie getting there, being there, and returning from there. And they are touching in on stories from other Tolkien novels, of which there are plenty, that involve side stories. Including the Necromancer that made ********** all over the forest, and the spiders, wood elves, the history behind the mountains and dragons, and such things as that.
[ 329 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)