747. 747 carrying like a boss....planes on top of planes na mean...no ? plane sex..
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

747

747 carrying like a boss....planes on top of planes na mean...no ? plane sex.

+1940
Views: 49546
Favorited: 76
Submitted: 12/08/2012
Add to favorites Subscribe to mrkillsalot Edit Image E-mail to friend
Share on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(100):

1 2 > [ 100 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
Show All Replies
#4 - tekoronia (12/09/2012) [+] (7 replies)
The fees are because they spend more fuel the more they carry, I believe.
#31 - wertq (12/09/2012) [+] (6 replies)


More weight = more fuel consumption. More fuel consumption = more money spent by airlines company per flight. More money spent by airlines company per flight = more money need to be gathered. More money need to be gathered = additional fees.
Use your head sometimes.
#27 - huntertde (12/09/2012) [+] (2 replies)
Bitch, have you SEEN Americans these days? A space shuttle is a break for that poor plane.
User avatar #10 - captinchikin (12/09/2012) [+] (2 replies)
It might be able to carry the 747....

But can it see why kids love Cinnamon Toast Crunch?
User avatar #13 to #10 - bromop (12/09/2012) [-]
lol wut? The 747 is the one carrying the shuttle, not the other way around.
User avatar #33 - semisane (12/09/2012) [+] (4 replies)
For fuck's sake, the luggage weight limit is NOT for the plane, it's for the people who actually have to load it on to the plane. Before the limits were enforced they all started getting crippling back problems from the never-ending heavy lifting.
#19 - whatugawkinat (12/09/2012) [+] (18 replies)
...Airports are a business. Regardless of weather the fees are for fuel cost, they are going to charge for everything they can. Welcome to America.
User avatar #23 to #19 - mcrubxpcod (12/09/2012) [-]
Welcome to every single airport in the world!
#68 - origommi (12/09/2012) [+] (19 replies)
**origommi rolled a random image posted in comment #1956821 at Item Discussion ** < on my 747
User avatar #11 - ultimatebuffalo (12/09/2012) [-]
Rule 34 - No Exceptions.
#43 - sirlongarm (12/09/2012) [+] (1 reply)
...before throwing him out of a plane?
#16 - klutzyspy (12/09/2012) [-]
umm the extra fee is fuel costs.
its not like it doesnt cost fuel to carry the space shuttle either.

Additionally, did you think the plane ran on money so if you paid a fee and they placed that in the fuel tank, suddenly it could fly with more luggage?
#2 - mydogisbuff (12/09/2012) [-]
thats actually pretty cool how they did that...
pic somewhat related
#44 - ShyRogue (12/09/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Calling bullshit on fees.
#46 - trojandetected (12/09/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Thats just plane wrong.
#37 - heartgoldawesome (12/09/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Comment Picture
#14 - N. Korean citizen (12/09/2012) [-]
The plane is able to carry the shuttle because the shuttle is angled to create additional lift to alleviate some of its own weight. The More You Know.
#84 - N. Korean citizen (12/09/2012) [-]
If a 747 can carry the space shuttle, then I can kinda like bald eagles and kinda like bald eagles with hair.
#78 - baconmonkey ONLINE (12/09/2012) [+] (1 reply)
i thought the same thing, but since the shuttle on top is designed to fly it actually creates more lift and ends up not really weighing anything at all
i was told this by a rocket scientist so i'm not just bullshitting

but bag fees are stupid
#40 - unoletmehavename (12/09/2012) [-]
When i tried this in kerbal space program it went into flaming ball of death
User avatar #25 - badsamaritan (12/09/2012) [-]
I saw it fly overhead on the morning commune to work.
1 2 > [ 100 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)