How it should have gone.. NOT OP WANTED TO SHARE. slurpin" t ‘Hi missing a hill: from tho room? will make sure he is dead by cutting his head off... Gandalf ins things that make
x
Click to expand

How it should have gone.

How it should have gone.. NOT OP WANTED TO SHARE. slurpin" t ‘Hi missing a hill: from tho room? will make sure he is dead by cutting his head off... Gandalf ins

NOT OP WANTED TO SHARE

slurpin" t ‘Hi missing a hill: from tho room?
will make sure he is dead by cutting his head off...
Gandalf instead of walking the ring to Mount Doom
why not use the giant eagles you know and fly?
Frodo that is a much better idea I' m glad you though of that!
Hold on I gotta put the safe}: on my
gun Jules is hitting some bumps...
Please allow '., to fight the
with you
You oan' t fight in the main group but stand
back and throw spears all day little buddy!
I' ll have two men take him to the woods
and take more of it '
TWO MENU! He' s an Roman general
you idiot, send twenty !i' e' ' ., make sure
it gets done right!
...
  • Recommend tagsx
+1294
Views: 36780
Favorited: 100
Submitted: 11/30/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to professorlayton submit to reddit

Comments(92):

[ 92 comments ]
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#3 - thedragonmaster (12/01/2012) [-]
While it seems like a good idea to ride the eagles to Mordor, I feel it is a terrible idea. If they had flown on them the Sauron would have spotted them and dispatched the Nazgul on their flying beasts to intercept them, and if it had been only Frodo and Sam they would be dead within minutes. I'm not trying to be a jerk just putting my opinion out there. :)
User avatar #29 to #3 - deathzor (12/01/2012) [-]
send Gandalf on the eagle with Sam and Frodo

one does not simply fly into mordor
User avatar #37 to #3 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (12/01/2012) [-]
Hooray, you and neodude have both fixed a massive hole in Lord of the Rings and the movie has been vastly improved once again. Balance has been restored.
#93 to #37 - Neodude (12/02/2012) [-]
there was no hole.....we were actually stating why there was no hole in the aspect of why they didn't use the eagles......crack is whack bro.
User avatar #94 to #93 - EdwardNigma ONLINE (12/02/2012) [-]
For people that don't know there was a hole.
By saying that, you have proved the hole is an illusion, thus fixing it.
User avatar #14 to #3 - prisonerzero (12/01/2012) [-]
One last point. If you remember carefully, you see that the council held by Elrond and Gandalf to discuss what to do with the ring was completely secret. They even got pissed when Samwise Gamgee and Merry and Pippin showed up. If they used the Eagles, well people are gonna ****** notice some eagles.
User avatar #15 to #14 - Crusader (12/01/2012) [-]
The eagles have remained largely hidden for thousands of years.
I'm sure that they could have gotten to Moria and then called them into a private area and traveled far away from civilization.
#11 to #3 - hillbillypowpow ONLINE (12/01/2012) [-]
Also in one of the books it says that they can't be near the rings because the are too pure
#60 to #11 - John Cena (12/01/2012) [-]
That's ******** . In the Hobbit, the Eagles carry Bilbo away from the warg army while he has the Ring in his pocket and there were no problems.
#4 to #3 - Neodude (12/01/2012) [-]
Honestly, seeing the whole, "use the eagles" argument always bothers me. By simply reading the Hobbit, anyone can understand that the eagles regarded the on-going war as not of their concern. the only reason they showed up in RotK is that if mankind lost that very final battle, Sauron would have the power to easily wipe them out, and so it became their problem.
#5 to #4 - thedragonmaster (12/01/2012) [-]
Plus they had their own problems to deal with mainly the trolls and orcs in the mountains breaking their nests and capturing them, and honestly in RotK they really were unneeded thanks to Aragorn forcing the Undead king to fulfill his oath which in my opinion turned the tide of battle way to easily.
#6 to #5 - Neodude (12/01/2012) [-]
actually, they needed them in the absolute last battle(outside of the gates of Mordor) The Nazgul would have torn their army several new bloody assholes had the eagles not intervened
User avatar #9 to #6 - shadowstepone (12/01/2012) [-]
but aside from the obvious, their journey was really important politically. because of them, humans got their **** together, overthrowing the steward and re-throning the rightful heir, they got rid of the orc army that could have still been a major threat under saruman when sauron was dead, they convinced the elves and dwarves to go their separate ways to make way for man, they freed the ghosts of the cowardly soldiers, etc.. using the eagles would have made a great number of problems that couldn't be fixed without the power and political influence of the ring.
#7 to #6 - thedragonmaster (12/01/2012) [-]
Ah, yes excellent point I completely forgot about that, thank you my friend. I think I may go rewatch it now because it was simply amazing. Although, while I have someone to talk to this about I was wondering what someone besides my normal group of friends think. Do you believe that if Aragorn really had died fighting the Wargs that they still could have defeated Sauron? I did not think so but I would like other opinions.
#10 to #7 - Neodude (12/01/2012) [-]
Its an interesting thought. I believe that Eomer may have stepped up into the position, doing the same as Aragorn, but to protect his sister. However, that leaves the fact that the ghost army never would have arrived,a s none remained to command their assistance.....its really iffy.
#92 to #10 - thedragonmaster (12/01/2012) [-]
I agree, all in all I thinks it's best that we just thank our lucky stars he survived lol
User avatar #17 - torkildsen (12/01/2012) [-]
The lotr one is a fail. The eagles can't and wouldn't have risked their lives while Sauron was still living and the Nazûgl's would have probably killed several of them. One does not simply fly into Mordor
User avatar #71 to #17 - duudegladiator (12/01/2012) [-]
Eagle are very smart things. Gotta love them. Avians FTW.
User avatar #18 to #17 - HeeroYuy (12/01/2012) [-]
Also, since the Eagles were under direct orders from Manwe to not interfere heavily, they probably wouldn't have done it anyway.
User avatar #22 to #17 - techketzer (12/01/2012) [-]
The thing they actually refused to do was transport the ring.
That's what it was about.
User avatar #24 to #22 - torkildsen (12/01/2012) [-]
I know, there's a lot of reasons, but I'm not going to say every single one. Would be sitting up all night long if I'd do that
#32 - thisisausernamec (12/01/2012) [-]
I might be wrong, but i thiiiink that bilbo first proposed the eagle idea in the hobbit, but Gandalf said that the eagles were great beast and wouldnt get that involved in the lives of "lower beings" (for lack of a better word)
User avatar #77 - thecuriousone (12/01/2012) [-]
JURASSIC PARK:

"I want to build a theme park with real dinosaurs!"
"That sounds dangerous"
"You're right. I shouldn't build it"
THE END
#41 - John Cena (12/01/2012) [-]
Hey, you know what sauron had before the ring was destroyed? ******* NAZGUL. riding giant winged MONSTERS. Think about it.
#43 - John Cena (12/01/2012) [-]
For the LOTR one:
1.eagles are neutral they don't help just anyone.
2. Sauron has a little thing called the nazgul, and they are not neutral they are on saurons side and they have a LOT. of them.
3. Not only that but it wouldnt even be able to escape saurons eye and if it flew that low it'd get shot to hell by archers.
User avatar #55 to #43 - thebritishguy (12/01/2012) [-]
the eagles and Gandalf are homies I bet the eagles would understand, if they got up to the point with the eye of sauron and then dropped them off it would have saved a lot of lives
User avatar #63 to #55 - nightranger (12/01/2012) [-]
They would have never gotten that far though. The eagles are cool but there aren't many, and they really wouldn't want to get involved because it would have risked the extinction of the eagles. The Nazgul would have attacked them and it would have been nasty.
User avatar #67 to #63 - thebritishguy (12/01/2012) [-]
yeah I forgot that there weren't many left, I can't believe they won against the dragons in a war
User avatar #64 to #43 - DrCrumpleBottem (12/01/2012) [-]
That's what I've been telling all my freinds but nooo.
#68 to #43 - auesis ONLINE (12/01/2012) [-]
And that's why Aragorn and crew sit at the Black Gate and moon Sauron to piss him off while the eagles fly around the back.
And that's why Aragorn and crew sit at the Black Gate and moon Sauron to piss him off while the eagles fly around the back.
#27 - frohling (12/01/2012) [-]
no army in the world can kill Russel crowe.
ohh i mean Maximus.
"fighting 'round the world!"
User avatar #39 - BwainPhreeze (12/01/2012) [-]
The Eagles aren't very willing to help as they pose neutral. Plus, I don't think that they would escape the eye of sauron.
User avatar #16 - sirhyden (12/01/2012) [-]
I never liked the Hangover.
User avatar #54 - ASDLSD (12/01/2012) [-]
Ar LOTR.
Because Sauron would've of seen them and send nazguls to eat them up
User avatar #65 to #54 - DrAlt (12/01/2012) [-]
I've seen that retarded question asked before. The huge Sauron eye can shoot magic lasers, summon Nazghuls, and generally controls the airspace. Also if the ring managed to slip off a hobbit finger, or take control of Frodo and make him jump off the Eagle when nearing Mount Doom, good side = screwed.
User avatar #69 to #65 - ASDLSD (12/01/2012) [-]
I didn't say it can shoot lasers
User avatar #70 to #69 - DrAlt (12/01/2012) [-]
I did. It's not in the books directly, but I'd be surprised if Sauron COULDN'T use anti-air magic blasts of some kind. He's like the big bad of middle earth and its his home turf.
#73 to #54 - jamiemsm (12/01/2012) [-]
no because gandalf dont control the eagles. they chose to help at the end.
#58 to #54 - anssi (12/01/2012) [-]
>Because Sauron would've of seen them and send nazguls to eat them up
> would've of seen them
>would've of
>of
>of?!?!?!?!
oh well
User avatar #59 to #58 - ASDLSD (12/01/2012) [-]
I'm sorry, please don't kill me
#61 to #59 - anssi (12/01/2012) [-]
If you can swim I won't
User avatar #62 to #61 - ASDLSD (12/01/2012) [-]
Oh, I consider myself lucky, I attended swimming classes
#30 - xxscopemanxx (12/01/2012) [-]
******* gladiator, best movie ever.
User avatar #46 to #30 - resolo (12/01/2012) [-]
AGREED
#40 to #30 - Spikeydeath (12/01/2012) [-]
are you not entertained!
#26 - maxoverderp (12/01/2012) [-]
Why do people keep ******* doing this
User avatar #28 to #26 - bagguhsleep (12/01/2012) [-]
Idunno. It really get's on my nerve's, though.
User avatar #36 - giblets (12/01/2012) [-]
Vader needed to live as he was the chosen one, and he was needed to bring balance to the force, so if Kenobi killed him at that point, then the sith would have grown more powerful.
In ROTJ he kills Sidious and then dies, killing all sith (I know in the extended universe there's more but still).

TL;DR? If Kenobi killed Vader at that point it'd have done more harm than good.
User avatar #1 - imbartichello (11/30/2012) [-]
i agree with all except for obi wan...
if he had killed him luke wouldn't have been able to kill the emperor i think since it was anakin that threw him down the shaft...
User avatar #2 to #1 - professorlayton (11/30/2012) [-]
Agreed
User avatar #12 to #1 - dragonhorn (12/01/2012) [-]
Also, Obi-wan didn't want to kill Anakin.
#34 to #1 - muchosgustaman (12/01/2012) [-]
He was the one to bring balance to the force, by wiping out the sith. just took a little longer than Qui-gon and Obi-wan anticipated.
-1
#49 to #34 - gritsreborn **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
#95 to #49 - muchosgustaman (12/02/2012) [-]
But the prophecy said he had to do it.
User avatar #8 to #1 - thepyras (12/01/2012) [-]
Might you say that Vader...gave him the shaft?
User avatar #57 - randomlunchbox (12/01/2012) [-]
Video's about the same thing.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fLyoog562x4
#87 to #57 - catdogsbarf (12/01/2012) [-]
I had the same Idea
good job friend :)

pic related:
<----how it actually happened
0
#42 - John Cena Comment deleted by professorlayton [-]
User avatar #13 - trolololing (12/01/2012) [-]
I have a problem with 300, it's not that it isn't a bad idea, it's just, y'know, it's based on a historical event, yes, if it was just a film that was thought up then that's reasonable enough, but this actually happened so I don't think you can point out flaws in plotlines with that sort of thing
#33 to #13 - muchosgustaman (12/01/2012) [-]
Ephialtes wasn't actually a mutant. He was a greek farmer whom Xerxes approached, he lived near Thermopylae, and was bribed to tell them anyhting he knew. The reason they made him a mutant in the film was to show how brutal the spartans were, even towards their own children. I studied it in Classical studies this year.
User avatar #45 to #13 - IloveWAFFLES (12/01/2012) [-]
Only thing fake about 300 was that it was just the spartans it was many other greek city state soldiers. (Like Lacedaemonians) all though the spartans number was 300 (who all died)

It was truly the first war were greek banded together
+2
#20 to #13 - italianplumberz **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #21 to #20 - trolololing (12/01/2012) [-]
on your last point fair enough, but the thing is is that's just not real spartan psychology, they were simply very judgmental people and he had an unnatural disability, and a Spartan wouldn't have been very compassionate to him and said 'Well ok, how about you just stand at the back and throw spears like a good spartan' he would've been very honest since Spartans just weren't very nice compassionate people
User avatar #56 to #21 - awesomanium (12/01/2012) [-]
Also 301 would be quite a ****** title.
User avatar #38 to #21 - kalthorak (12/01/2012) [-]
Also, Spartans considered combat that wasn't hand to hand to be of cowards, that's why you never see an archer in the movie, just hoplites.
#90 - girlgamerxxx (12/01/2012) [-]
lol wtf all these movies sucked. i preferred the more autobrigaphal stuff like the justin bieber and katy perry movie, i hope they make a 1 direction movie soon! #gamergirl
#96 to #91 - CrazyPsycho (12/05/2012) [-]
**CrazyPsycho rolled a random image posted in comment #1828625 at MLP Brony Board ** that one always makes me chuckle.
**CrazyPsycho rolled a random image posted in comment #1828625 at MLP Brony Board ** that one always makes me chuckle.
User avatar #66 - Loppytaffy (12/01/2012) [-]
I've thought about how much better YuGiOh could have gone for a long time now;
previous Pharoah sees that his brother already has a son. So, he lets his nephew Seto become pharoah.
Millenium items are never made, Bakura has no need for revenge, there aren't any tombkeepers so Marik doesn't get pissy, sure Yuugi still gets bullied every day but that's life, kid.

Everything that goes wrong in that show is Atem's fault just for being born.
User avatar #52 - npfortytwo (12/01/2012) [-]
SPOILERS BELOW IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN PULP FICTION AND WANT TO:

Even if Vincent hadn't shot Marvin, only a part of the story would be missing. They wouldn't have gone to Jimmy's or met The Wolf, nor would they have ended up at that cafe. But, they still delivered the briefcase. Essentially, The Gold Watch and Vincent Vega and Marsellus Wallace's Wife wouldn't have been affected by the situation. Admittedly, The Bonnie Situation does lead to Jules's catharsis, but then again, he still considered the incident with the fourth shooter as divine intervention before Vincent shot Martin.

(Original comment deleted because I used the wrong name for one of them and that would've ****** it up)
[ 92 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)