You'll shoot your eye out, kid.

am i the only fucking person that doesn't actually likes scopes ? don't you like a challenge ?

I see the best of both worlds. Iron sights are pretty freakin' cool, but your guns probably shoot better than you can see anyways, so why not have one with a decent scope on it?

Using a scope in combat has advantages, mostly it aids in target identification, but it also allows for crude rangefinding and ballistic compensation out to 800 meters.

Every soldier in the Army is trained to use iron sights, then when deployed some are given an ACOG to aid in killing the enemy.

I prefer iron sights on many rifles, but when I was in Afghanistan, I was glad I had an ACOG.

dude, most of us just use guns in the shooting range or at the woods for hunting, if i were in a war of course i would use a scope because its easier and better and has advantages, but when shooting for fun i won't use it

I have a 2 tone AEG... How do you think I feel? Bright fucking orange man...

That is a ACOG......

That actually is an ACOG...

That's my favorite Christmas song.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=fI9V2m04QZw

instantrimshot.com/

Screw the Yules, I have Money

They're just 1,500 dollars extra....fucking ACOG's.

1500 dollars for a fucking scope? hory shit. wtf

Depends on which model you get actually. The smaller, more compact ACOG is anywhere from 1,000 - 1,200. Schmidt-Bender Rifle Scopes (the variable zoom scope the USMC uses for the M40A5) are 3,800 a piece.

why are scopes so expensive!?

The ACOGs are purged and sealed with Argon gas, making them fog proof. Also, they have have small amounts of a radioactive material called Tritium that allows the reticle to glow, even in complete darkness.

wow. i never thought so much work went into making scopes...

Learning is half the battle!

w..what? WHY? WHO DID THIS?
this movie was a part of my childhood... and i can't imagine this movie with new actors or setting.

Completely new actors but same characters while ripping off many ideas from the original but also setting place at age 16? for him, but really was and is a prime example of a sequel that should not be made

when was the original film made? You can't do this jokes in a 2000 setting..
just.... NO

1983 and this should give you an idea

Also i completely refuse to ever see it

So you refuse to see it but judge it anyway?

Yes because its completely unnecessary and just the idea of it would more than likely end badly