Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#10 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
*raises hand*

Christian here. Not butthurt for the content, but more for the fact that it's from teh Old testament. the Old Law, that, ya know....according teh the same bible he's quoting, Jesus died so we didn't need that anymore.

Mfw atheists pretend to know **** about teh Bible, and don't know **** about the Bible. For God's sake, I don't care if you don't believe like me, but please, if you're going to try and throw it in my brothers' faces, at least do it right.

Also, to clarify. I'm butthurt because it's annoying, not because you're doing teh whole "Blah blah, slavery in teh Bible, blah blah" thing
User avatar #66 to #10 - habanaro (11/28/2012) [-]
Paul talks about homosexuality too.
Romans 1:26-27.
Pretty sure that's new testament.
User avatar #64 to #10 - thelastamerican (11/28/2012) [-]
I'm cool with that, but she initiated the argument by using quotes from the old law in her original argument. If she opens the can of worms she should be prepared to have it dumped on her head.

If it makes you feel better I already knew about everything you just said. From the brief comment I would say that I don't believe quite like you, but along the same lines.
#55 to #10 - anonymous (11/28/2012) [-]
The new testament clearly says "I do not allow a woman to assume authority over a man. She must remain silent". Or at least something along those lines.

inb4 whats the problem here and everything along those lines
#47 to #10 - RageGuyyourmom (11/28/2012) [-]
Hey, its your book, if the rest of the world cant pick and choose out of it than you cant just disregard half of it.
#39 to #10 - EdwardNigma (11/28/2012) [-]
Yeah, whatever, I have one question. Why the **** are you saying "teh"? Why not say "The" like a normal person?
User avatar #470 to #39 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/29/2012) [-]
I have this terrible habit of hitting the e key before the h key.
User avatar #43 to #39 - cantfindausername (11/28/2012) [-]
He said both "teh" and "the" a few times. It's a common typo.
User avatar #46 to #43 - EdwardNigma (11/28/2012) [-]
I understand once or twice, but seriously, a total of 5 times is ridiculous.
User avatar #49 to #46 - cantfindausername (11/28/2012) [-]
I understand that. What a silly wo/man he is.
User avatar #50 to #49 - cantfindausername (11/28/2012) [-]
woman/man*

he/she *

...How silly I am.
#38 to #10 - adamks ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
MFW people think that the bible can be a argument for ANYTHING IN THE WORLD what so ever.
#26 to #10 - anonymous (11/28/2012) [-]
"for God's sake" ? i'm an atheist, even i know that's using God's name in vain.
User avatar #28 to #26 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
Oh...sorry for sinning. SORRY EVERYBODY! Sorry. That totally invalidates my point, and I redact all previous comments. Sorry! D:
#25 to #10 - drldrl (11/28/2012) [-]
MFW Christians try to say the old rules don't apply anymore.   
   
It's like that asshole kid you played with when you were young that kept making up new rules for the game they made up.
MFW Christians try to say the old rules don't apply anymore.

It's like that asshole kid you played with when you were young that kept making up new rules for the game they made up.
User avatar #68 to #25 - thelastamerican (11/28/2012) [-]
The old testament really doesn't apply in the sense that the rules and laws have to be followed. The reason being that a new set of rules is given in the new testament. It's exactly like the annoying kid changing the rules, but in this case it's an omnipotent, extra dimensional being changing the rules.
User avatar #92 to #68 - drldrl (11/28/2012) [-]
Here's another thing I see wrong with Christianity, God being loving AND omnipotent. He can't be both.
Evil exists in the world, you can't deny it.
And if God is omnipotent, he knows about it and can stop it, but doesn't love us enough to stop it.
He could be able to stop it and wants to, but doesn't know about, meaning he isn't omnipotent.
He could also know about it and wants to help, but can't making him again, not omnipotent.
User avatar #27 to #25 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
But, if you actually read Scripture, that's what Jesus was. He was the game changer. I'm not saying you have to like, it, not saying you have to believe it.

But its like if I picked up a book about an artist, who's style of painting changed completely and said "Oh, he still does the old kind of art, because this book says he did this before, even though it also says it changed."
0
#78 to #27 - amandatoddd **User deleted account** has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #29 to #27 - drldrl (11/28/2012) [-]
You're comparing things that shouldn't be compared.
First, you tell people that if you don't live this way, you're going to Hell for eternal pain.
Next, you say if you lived like that you're going to Hell for eternal pain.
These are major things. Painting a penguin in two different styles isn't.
User avatar #30 to #29 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
No, see, that's still not the point I'm making. The point I'm TRYING to make, is that any arguments, for, or against, Christianity, or any Holy Bible based religion using quotes from the Old Testament, are invalid, and annoy the **** out of me.
User avatar #31 to #30 - drldrl (11/28/2012) [-]
And Christians annoy the **** out of me :D
Did you know, that the people who were born before Christianity even started and were not baptized are in Hell according to Christianity? That's some ****** up **** .
User avatar #32 to #31 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
Actually, according to the Christianity I know, Baptism has nothing to do with it. It's the acceptance of Jesus Christ as you Lord and Saviour
that determines it.
#33 to #32 - zukabazuka (11/28/2012) [-]
So in short, you say the first bible was made by man? and not by god then? Then the second would also be made by man. Not by god. Because in almost every single case bible is brought up this is often repeated.

"ITS THE WORD OF GOD"

You see, this is where the problem begins, if the old rules don't apply does that mean the people who followed it back then would be punished because the new generation thought we needed a new one?

People followed that book for 1000 years or more. I say the old bible is still something that belong to your religion. Its not something you can throw away and say it doesn't matter what it said. Your religion acted in its name and waged war with it. It belongs to you and you can't just get rid of it. Its always going to be brought up.
User avatar #34 to #33 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
Oh come on....

The bible was dictated by God, written by man.

God's original rules, stopped applying, when Jesus died on the cross. How hard is that to understand? When the new rules came into effect, the old ones stopped applying.

TL ****** DR

Officially pissed off, I'm done.
#59 to #34 - fogglebeast (11/28/2012) [-]
Out of all the posts about Old Testament versus New Testament, I have decided to pick yours to reply to - not for any negative reason, but simply because of the fact that what you typed was particularly interesting.

My problem, however, is that you (and others here) keep saying that 'the rules changed'. That makes no sense if we're talking about the Christian god. An all-knowing god would have no need to change its own rules (as they, like their maker, should be perfect), and by doing so, it shows how inconsistant this god really is.

Also, there's no reason to be 'officially pissed off' when it comes to discussing religion and philosophy, etc. When someone questions or pokes holes in your beliefs, don't brood angrily over it; instead, rationally counter the argument, or fill those holes and reinforce your opinions.
#35 to #34 - zukabazuka (11/28/2012) [-]
They stopped applying when Jesus died on the cross... So why did they keep preaching about the rules then? I'm sure the new testament wasn't made straight away after Jesus died on the cross. Which mean people still followed the old rules back then.
#17 to #10 - yunablade (11/28/2012) [-]
**yunablade rolled a random image posted in comment #137 at Oh you... **

Last time I checked, the exodus was still included in the new testament.

Checkmate.
User avatar #52 to #17 - thelastamerican (11/28/2012) [-]
Wait, what?
#22 to #17 - blaque (11/28/2012) [-]
And how long ago was that?
#21 to #17 - gassnake (11/28/2012) [-]
Check again..... it is the 2nd book of the Old Testament.
atleastyoutried.jpg
User avatar #24 to #21 - yunablade (11/28/2012) [-]
Exodus is from the old testament, since is the very first book yes, but in catholic bibles that are supposedly new testament, exodus is still included
#18 to #17 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
I took it with my phone camera, and it does weird stuff, so, sorry about it being sideways.
#16 to #10 - anonymous (11/28/2012) [-]
she quoted it first so why exclude her ?
User avatar #19 to #16 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
If she's quoting Old Law as well, then she's no better.
User avatar #11 to #10 - wesselite ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
*raises eyebrow*

Agnostic here and I can safely say... I don't give a **** about both points of view, just let people do what they want, as long as it doesn't hurt anyone.
#12 to #11 - brokentrucker ONLINE (11/28/2012) [-]
Also good.
#23 to #12 - insanefreak (11/28/2012) [-]
To be honest, I'm muslim, and all I'm saying is:
Don't use religion as an excuse to make war, or butthurt. I mean, let's face something very simple here.

(Almost) every religion (excluding sects and the like) had one goal, and tried to reach that goal by imposing rules on humans to make them reach that goal. To let humans have a good, decent, and peaceful life. People arguing about specific rules are completely ignoring the real idea behind it.

Same thing with people talking about Marxism, communism (related to Marxism, but there are differences), and c(or is it with a k? English is my third language, so pardon the mistakes)apitalism. The goal of those ideas was to create a good economical environment for everyone.


So can't we make a deal people? Make fun of details if you win, but can we please, please, not try to annoy each other for a sake different than humor? Can't we try to improve the world, rather than insult?
Basically, what I'm saying is, can't we try to do good? Be it as a christian, muslim, jew, or whatever you may believe in, can't we just stick to the main ideas of religion? To help people?
 Friends (0)