OWNED!!!!. . The Feed stamp program, a part the Department Agriculture, is pleased be distributing the greatest amount at food stamps ever. Meanwhile, the Park
Home Funny Pictures YouTube Funny Videos Funny GIFs Text/Links Channels Search

OWNED!!!!

The Feed stamp program, a part the Department
Agriculture, is pleased be distributing the
greatest amount at food stamps ever.
Meanwhile, the Park Service, which is also part
the Department of Agriculture, asks us tn
because the animals may grew dependent
and not learn take care for themselves.
...
+1238
Views: 42799
Favorited: 98
Submitted: 11/15/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to jefflsu E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(136):

[ 136 comments ]
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
User avatar #139 - sxespanky (11/17/2012) [-]
lol i like how i got both of my comments negatived because i said theres alotta people who do this. funny junk must be a bunch of ******* !
#104 - kingpongthedon (11/16/2012) [-]
Personal story: My parents owned there own business. They made good money and we all lived comfortably. One day, my mom notices a weird growth in her breast. She goes to the doctor and they say not to worry about it, she's too young to get cancer, it's probably a cyst or something. So she doesn't worry about it. Next year, she still has the lump, doctors say the same thing. Next year she goes to the doctor and, total shocker, she has stage 4 breast cancer. Next thing we know, we're drowning in bills, as insurance refuses to pay for treatment. My mom is out of commission for over a year and my dad spends his time looking after her, rarely working as he has to make sure she gets to her constant appointments. All income goes away. Now for added effect, it's 2008 and we just had a financial collapse.

At this point, I was almost seventeen and seriously considering dropping out of school. Not because I wanted to, I was an A student, but because my family literally could not afford to keep me out of the workforce. However, we got government assistance. To get full benefits, I had to stay in school. And that's how it would stay until I graduated high school. But then what? Well, fortunately I was able to stay focused on my education and maintain a 4+ GPA and get a ton of scholarship money. But it was still only about 3/4 of tuition, and there doesn't seem to be any school who will take 3/4 tuition. Fortunately the government stepped in again and since we were below that line, they subsidized my education again allowing me to get into one of the top schools in the Southeast, where I'm doing quite well.

Realistically, without government assistance, I'd be dealing coke right now. It's easy money and a lot of it. Plus I already knew most of the dealers in my town and could get started in hours. At least until I got caught and go to prison where I cost even more to support.

Most people's story is much closer to this than a new source for rims.
#95 - SubjectThree (11/16/2012) [-]
"Yeah, God forbid animals get hooked on human stuff. They'd probably use it better,anyway."
#106 to #95 - qwertycat (11/16/2012) [-]
I know right? And they are OBVIOUSLY alive today only because they ate your left-over hamburgers from the day they were born until now...

It's not like animals got to survive this long from using their animal skills.

#93 - anonomysmonkey (11/16/2012) [-]
While this is an interesting remark, the information used is false. The Park Service is not a part of the Department of Agriculture (does that  even sound correct?). You can easily look up the Park Services website and see that it's a part of the Department of the Interior.    
Also people on wellfare need that money to survive so it helps them. Bears do just fine on their own and giving them free food to the point where they become dependent would only kill them in the end.    
   
   
   
So 						****					 you.
While this is an interesting remark, the information used is false. The Park Service is not a part of the Department of Agriculture (does that even sound correct?). You can easily look up the Park Services website and see that it's a part of the Department of the Interior.
Also people on wellfare need that money to survive so it helps them. Bears do just fine on their own and giving them free food to the point where they become dependent would only kill them in the end.



So **** you.
#103 to #93 - anonomysmonkey (11/16/2012) [-]
Also, comparing poor people to animals FTW ಠ_ಠ
User avatar #101 to #93 - konages (11/16/2012) [-]
both giving food to bears and people teaches them they don't have to work for **** ...
#108 to #101 - anonomysmonkey (11/16/2012) [-]
Yeah but it's the lesser of two evils: Risk starting a trend of dependence or letting people die of starvation. Also people can think for themselves. Would you rather work and live a normal quality of life or do drugs all day get food stamps?
User avatar #110 to #108 - konages (11/16/2012) [-]
some people choose to not to work and get free money instead of working
#111 to #110 - anonomysmonkey (11/16/2012) [-]
Yeah but that's illegal to scam the government like that. Not much else the government can do but arrest them when caught.
Some people also sell drugs, making drug cartels stronger and stronger and taking money out of the economy and into the black market.... **** happens man. What are you gonna do?
User avatar #113 to #111 - konages (11/16/2012) [-]
not give free money to drug users (i.e. drug test welfare recipients). BTW its not illegal to collect welfare even if you're not looking for a job in most states.
#115 to #113 - anonomysmonkey (11/16/2012) [-]
Go ahead and drug test the 46 million people a month receiving food stamps. Maybe we should just drug test everybody. That way we can be sure we're enforcing our drug policy well enough. Nobody should have to endure the evil temptation and consequences of narcotics.
User avatar #116 to #115 - konages (11/16/2012) [-]
nah we just need to test the ones getting free money so we can make sure government money isn't going towards drugs. everyone else is protected by the 4th amendment
#117 to #116 - anonomysmonkey (11/16/2012) [-]
Let's also drug test all the people payed by the government. I mean they could also spend that money on drugs. Let's also drug test public school teachers before they get their pay checks to make sure that money isn't spent on drugs. Maybe we should also drug test students who get grants to make sure they don't spend their money on drugs. Maybe the fourth amendment just shouldn't apply to anybody getting government funds.
User avatar #123 to #117 - konages (11/16/2012) [-]
all those people get drug tested before they get hired
#127 to #123 - anonomysmonkey (11/16/2012) [-]
I know for a fact that school teachers and students getting financial aid don't.
User avatar #133 to #127 - konages (11/16/2012) [-]
students it depends on the state, every state drug tests teachers before they are hired. Some are even randomly tested during their tenure, depending on the district
#92 - mainstreamed (11/16/2012) [-]
the biggest of  facepalms
the biggest of facepalms
#83 - wishanonscouldpost ONLINE (11/16/2012) [-]
Parks don't want you to feed animals because it attracts them to areas where humans are. Not because they become dependent on humans.

Food stamps are to help poor people eat. Better for the economy to have people alive spending money on other stuff, then have people die and not spend money on anything.
User avatar #87 to #83 - Yardie (11/16/2012) [-]
Somebody doesn't know how the economy works.

Spending doesn't = economy

production = economy

Spending helps production, but only if the spending is going towards domestic products, which most of the time it doesn't. Look at all the poor people who shop at Walmart.
#94 to #87 - wishanonscouldpost ONLINE (11/16/2012) [-]
Just because companies in the US import some of their products, it doesn't mean it doesn't help the American economy. The money still goes to the American company. Production in other countries is still funded by the company you are giving money to.
User avatar #82 - cullenatorguy (11/16/2012) [-]
It's much harder to abuse welfare than it seems OP thinks. You have to be in deep **** to get it, and many people aren't on for very long (2 years).
User avatar #98 to #82 - reaperriley ONLINE (11/16/2012) [-]
I live in PA and I had the most ironic thing happen to me when it comes to welfare. I live in a small town near pittsburgh where our tools are basically people trying to be rednecks. Sadly one of my good friends is kind of like that. And he make a joke that was somethign like "All those ******* in pittsburgh are all probably playing black ops 2 right now because they are on welfare." And his mom seriously agreed with him and went into more detail. When I went to leave with a friend I brought that up. turns out that my friend's family, the one with the racist mom, is on welfare. Oh the sweet irony.
#84 to #82 - captnpl (11/16/2012) [-]
NY has no limit to how long you can be on it.
User avatar #86 to #84 - cullenatorguy (11/16/2012) [-]
The limit doesn't matter. People eventually get off when they no longer require the support welfare brings. That time period is usually two years.
#107 to #86 - captnpl (11/16/2012) [-]
But some don't, some spend there entire lives on it. Also, there are some people in my area that have as many children as possible to get extra government aid, then make the kids get jobs and support themselves as soon as they turn 16.
User avatar #109 to #107 - cullenatorguy (11/16/2012) [-]
Most people who stay on it their whole lives are in really deep **** . There's always going to be someone abusing the system. The fact that the parents make their kids get jobs is good, it means they won't be in the **** their parents are.
#80 - kerplunking (11/16/2012) [-]
Oh great, it's conservatard opinion time.
Oh great, it's conservatard opinion time.
#91 to #80 - jedic (11/16/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#79 - anonymous (11/16/2012) [-]
im all for a good poor people joke, but your completely serious, and completely ignorant. dont give opinions on things you know nothing about
#75 - drimsical (11/16/2012) [-]
this post made no sense to me at all
either im retarded
or i dont understand america at all
-3
#76 to #75 - ragged has deleted their comment [-]
User avatar #73 - imagnetsux ONLINE (11/16/2012) [-]
that's because it's still possible for a mama bear to support her family without our help
#71 - kingpongthedon (11/16/2012) [-]
Does anybody here complaining about welfare actually know the statistics? Because if you look at them, you'll see that the vast majority (>90%) are on for less than 2 years as it is VERY difficult to get any benefits while in good health for any length of time. And the majority of the remaining ten percent are facing debilitating illnesses. All told, less than one in 25 people on welfare could be said to be abusing the system. Compare this to the costs associated with white collar crimes, such as tax evasion, and you'll see it's a much smaller problem than you think it is.
User avatar #99 to #71 - cancerousiguana (11/16/2012) [-]
Nah, dude, I heard all about it from Rush Limbaugh. Everybody (100%) on foodstamps/welfare is a lazy pot smoker who wants to have abortions all day, and it's costing hard-working white christians to pay for it, that's why they voted in the communist muslim socialist Hitler for President.

It's like you don't even know the facts or something.
User avatar #68 - bandoslootshare (11/16/2012) [-]
uh.. if we were surrounded by viable farm land, I'm pretty sure we can feed ourselves off the vegetation, but I live in the city.
#65 - stratosrider (11/16/2012) [-]
THIS. YES.   
(title needs work though...)
THIS. YES.
(title needs work though...)
User avatar #63 - lfunnymanl (11/16/2012) [-]
looks like somefag does not know who patient bear is.
#62 - heyimathespian (11/16/2012) [-]
I sure understand what this post is trying to say, but as long as measures are put in place so the system isn't abused, would you rather tax money go to helping those who need it, or building weapons that we have more than enough of? Considering about 30-40% goes to military and surplus is keeping people from starving really that bad?
#66 to #62 - wyldek (11/16/2012) [-]
The US is trillions of dollars in debt. What surplus?
User avatar #59 - dementedllama (11/16/2012) [-]
This isn't saying food stamps should be discontinued, it's saying the people who are on them simply because they're lazy scum-suckers shouldn't be getting them.
#58 - lolerswagg (11/16/2012) [-]
dat title
dat title
User avatar #56 - ilikearabs (11/16/2012) [-]
some people are born with certain perks and others are born with unfortunate circumstances (poor parents, drunks and **** )... i believe these people should be givin the privilege of food stamps...notice how i said privilege. i believe that food stamps should be taken away if the reverser of said food staps is on drugs or has been committing crimes....
[ 136 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)