| Home | RSS Feeds |
| Funny Pictures | Funny Videos |
| Funny GIFs | YouTube Videos |
| Text/Links | Comic Editor |
| User Rankings | Channels |
| Copyright Removal Request | |
| |
Think about it.
Emma Watson nudes leaked:
adf.ly/ET7jm
Tags: Cars
| |
That's a pretty gay description right there. And a thesaurus would do a better job, using a dictionary would be retarded.
#74
-
zukowashere (11/10/2012) [+]
(1 reply)
Man, this is a gay and retard post.
The word lame used to be used for cripples and the mentally disabled. Then they used the word retarded. You can advance an engine or you can retard it. Now they started using the term "special needs" for those people. I find that that's still offensive. Their needs aren't special. Everyone has unique needs, some more than others. I have a cousin who is allergic to a few things. Is he "special needs" just because he needs to take care of what he eats more than other people do? No, he isn't. He's a perfectly capable human being just like anyone else. Some people just have a harder time achieving the same results.
We also forget that not too long ago "gay" meant happy. Sure, words change, but don't start pointing figures at people who modify a words meaning. You're telling me it's okay for the homosexual community to change a word meaning happy to a word describing a person who prefers their own gender, but it's not okay for me to turn the word from meaning happy to meaning stupid?
The word lame used to be used for cripples and the mentally disabled. Then they used the word retarded. You can advance an engine or you can retard it. Now they started using the term "special needs" for those people. I find that that's still offensive. Their needs aren't special. Everyone has unique needs, some more than others. I have a cousin who is allergic to a few things. Is he "special needs" just because he needs to take care of what he eats more than other people do? No, he isn't. He's a perfectly capable human being just like anyone else. Some people just have a harder time achieving the same results.
We also forget that not too long ago "gay" meant happy. Sure, words change, but don't start pointing figures at people who modify a words meaning. You're telling me it's okay for the homosexual community to change a word meaning happy to a word describing a person who prefers their own gender, but it's not okay for me to turn the word from meaning happy to meaning stupid?
#69
-
N. Korean citizen (11/10/2012) [-]
When I say fag, I don't use it in a derogatory term for homosexuals. I use it when someone's being a fag.