Personally, I'd say the amount of mindless stoners will go down. Sure a lot of people are going to get high now, but the idiotic stoners will probably switch to something like bath salts or cocaine since old mary jane won't be the cool illegal drug now.

**CrazyPsycho rolled a random image posted in comment #34 at what the wut.... ** Not everyone smokes weed because its "cool and illegal" idiot.

And I didn't say that everyone did either.

And Romney would have been better...

I personally don't like either. Clinton was/still is my favorite.

You mean Bush's debt..?

You honestly think Bush was the one who got us that far into debt?

yes and I have hundreds of pages of facts and figures to back it up "you can find them on the internet to just look it up. all u got is fox news's feelings and opinions.

A lot of people don't like obama because he has black in him :l

IMO, They would have been screwed if Romney won because he is for the rich and a lot of those idiot ass hole who were calling Obama a nigger after he won are most likely broke as shit. They make people think that ALL white people are ignorant, racist ass holes.

If he brought us that far into debt, why was it never mentioned during his presidency? Why is it brought up all of a sudden when Barack Obama is in office?

Here you go.
http://zfacts.com/p/318.html

I believe you failed to see the rest of the graph. Bust did in fact increase debt, but did you so happen to see the rest? When Obama took office?

you didn't read it. It said that it's neither Bush nor Obamas fault and it's from the failing economy.

Then why on earth did you bring up the subject that it was Bush's debt at the start of this very conversation?

Why did you say it was Obamas?

Why do you reply to my questions with more questions? If you are not going to answer my question, then I might as well be talking to a wall.

Read the graph. IT says it's nobodies fault. That's the point of my argument.

Once again you contradict yourself. You say, "it's nobodies fault." But you truly fail to see that you said that it was Bush's debt (A.K.A. fault) , at the very start of this conversation,for the current amount of soaring debt today. So now you have two arguments? One that contradicts the other? I am confused sir.