Simple math. Click this: . um 1 Then: 2: 95 xas. real answer
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search

hide menu

Simple math

Tags: Cars | crashes
um 1
Then:
2: 95 xas
...
+1636
Views: 56731
Favorited: 51
Submitted: 11/05/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to instict E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(106):

[ 106 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
#1 - bigbawser (11/05/2012) [+] (3 replies)
Is it bad that i read the title as "Simple Meth"?
#2 to #1 - bleeduntildeath ONLINE (11/05/2012) [-]
fixed
#5 - rainbowtacos (11/05/2012) [+] (16 replies)
#27 to #15 - retardedtriforce (11/06/2012) [-]
Are you 12?
#59 - jasonrussel (11/06/2012) [-]
real answer
User avatar #30 - hyrule (11/06/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Actually the two sided limit is undefined. But as x approaches 8 from the left, the limit is -infinity. As x approaches 8 from the right, the limit goes to +infinity.

Sources: I'm Chinese. I'm born with this knowledge imbued in me.
#33 - darman (11/06/2012) [+] (6 replies)
Neither of the two limits exist.
Neither of the two limits exist.
#35 to #34 - partnerintroll (11/06/2012) [-]
No. Math has notation just like English has grammar. The limit doesnt exist because coming from the right and coming from the left the limits are different, meaning the overall limit does not exist.

Pic related. It's the same way with math. If it was limx->8- [1/(x-8)] then it would be true
-18
#45 - dragonchick has deleted their comment [+] (5 replies)
User avatar #49 to #45 - DrBobsPatient (11/06/2012) [-]
it's the limit of, you idiot. limit doesn't mean equal to.
#79 - gunmetal (11/06/2012) [-]
How the **** repost like this get so many thumbs?
#91 - holololland (11/06/2012) [+] (1 reply)
**holololland rolled a random image posted in comment #1228229 at Item Discussion ** mfw math
User avatar #78 - drastronomy (11/06/2012) [+] (11 replies)
15, do not know this

i am interested in math

someone briefly explain - wikipedia article sucks ass
#83 to #78 - CIS White Male (11/06/2012) [-]
in the first one it is asking for a limit (lim) or the value of y as x approaches 8. The close you get to 8 (8.0001 for instance), the smaller the number you are dividing by, which inscreases the number you are dividing. so when you get really really small like .00000000000001 it approaches infinity.

for the second one it is asking about the value of y as the line of the second equation's graph approaches 5 on the x axis. The close you get to 5, the smaller the denominator becomes and the lager the numerator becomes after division; the limit is infinity again.

the joke is based on the two upright 8's and the "sideways 8" (infinity sign) in the first one and there being 5 upright 5's in the second so someone put a sideways 5 as the answer
#36 - blackenvy (11/06/2012) [+] (1 reply)
I remember seeing the picture as a kid. At that time I was looking at it for 30 min trying to figure out how it is done. In the end I have come to a conclusion that I just can t do it.   
On this very day in exactly 1 h I have a partial exam in limes and demand and supply functions. Is it irony that I see this picture today ?
I remember seeing the picture as a kid. At that time I was looking at it for 30 min trying to figure out how it is done. In the end I have come to a conclusion that I just can t do it.
On this very day in exactly 1 h I have a partial exam in limes and demand and supply functions. Is it irony that I see this picture today ?
#64 - kleip (11/06/2012) [+] (3 replies)
This is actually a common misconception. You see, because of the way the lim matrix is constructed, the vector between the unknown value of x and the constant 5 is unparallel to the equation's infinitly changing result. Thus the final sum must be inverded from the one currently shown.

In this case, I direct your eyes to the attached .png file to my left for the actual result.

You're welcome.
User avatar #56 - kanatana (11/06/2012) [-]
This took me a second to get, I never took higher mathematics
#22 - agentmoleman (11/06/2012) [+] (2 replies)
How do I math?
#4 - CIS White Male (11/05/2012) [+] (5 replies)
the first one is wrong.
#10 to #8 - nexdemise (11/06/2012) [-]
Wrong.
Limit x->8+ (from the right) 1/(x-8) = infinity.
Limit x->8- (from the left) 1/(x-8) = -infinity
If limit x->a+ =/= limit x->a- then limit x->a Does not exist.
#108 - letharg (11/06/2012) [-]
MFW I read the description
#101 - haseotakaeda ONLINE (11/06/2012) [+] (4 replies)
They do not exist due to the fact that infinity is not a number, it is an idea and therefore cannot be treated as a number. If it were a number....
1/0 = inf.
2/0 = inf.
1=2
Yeah, didn't think so.
#110 to #101 - CIS White Male (11/06/2012) [-]
Just to point this out, but by your logic, 0 isn't a number either.
1*0=0
2*0=0
1=2
yeah, doesn't work.
#89 - dishesaredone (11/06/2012) [-]
Comment Picture
#63 - plokijuhygt (11/06/2012) [-]
Mfw everyone here's arguing about math.
Mfw everyone here's arguing about math.
#42 - climbingupthewalls (11/06/2012) [-]
i'm switching to a math major with actuary science concentration, and we're starting integration in calc I soon. MFW i saw this
i'm switching to a math major with actuary science concentration, and we're starting integration in calc I soon. MFW i saw this
#26 - trevanman (11/06/2012) [+] (4 replies)
no because limx = 8 that would mean 1:(8-8), that would be 1 divided by zero....
#29 to #26 - CIS White Male (11/06/2012) [-]
Word of advice don't try to solve a problem if you don't know whats going on.
[ 106 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)