Sapio. Somebody is getting laid tonight . rt) A behavior of becoming attracted to er aroused by intelligence and its use.. how i image sex for them WHATS 5x5 YOU DIRTY SLUT TWEENTEEY FIVVE TWEENTEEY FIIVE!!
Home Original Content Funny Pictures Funny GIFs YouTube Funny Text Funny Movies Channels Search
Buy your amazon goods through FJ's link.
Just click this link and search for any product you want. FJ gets a commission on everything you buy.

Sapio

Somebody is getting laid tonight

rt) A behavior of becoming attracted to
er aroused by intelligence and its use.
...
+2673
Views: 79844
Favorited: 226
Submitted: 11/02/2012
Share On Facebook
Add to favorites Subscribe to rollup E-mail to friend submit to reddit
Share image on facebook Share on StumbleUpon Share on Tumblr Share on Pinterest Share on Google Plus E-mail to friend

Comments(334):

[ 334 comments ]

Show All Replies Show Shortcuts
Show:   Top Rated Controversial Best Lowest Rated Newest Per page:
Order:
What do you think? Give us your opinion. Anonymous comments allowed.
User avatar #27 - patriotpenguin (11/03/2012) [+] (24 replies)
how i image sex for them

WHATS 5x5 YOU DIRTY SLUT

TWEENTEEY FIVVE TWEENTEEY FIIVE!!
#156 - nebuchadnezzaurus (11/03/2012) [+] (13 replies)
I'm literally at a boiling point right now
1. First of all, this looks like it's fresh off Tumblr, 9gag or Facebook. It instantly reminded me of that incredibly dumb post about the supposed "units of pain" that a woman feels.
2. If the word "sapiosexual" were any more forced, it would ******* burst from your computer screen. First of all, it is not a word. It's not in the several actual dictionaries I own, it's not on Merriam-Webster, not in Oxford Dictionaries Online, there's not even a Wikipedia entry about it.
3. It is not a NOUN, it's a ******* adjective. If you make up a word, at least know what part of speech it actually is. But since it's a noun, the description makes no ******* sense: "a behavior that something something". That's like if I said: "Are you sapiosexual (what a dumb word)? - Yes, I am behavior of becoming attracted to intelligence".
4. The concept behind this is so stupid it pains me just to think about it. Really? Sexually attracted to intelligence? That makes no ******* sense. The idea has probably been thrown in by hopeless basement dwellers or permanent residents of "the friend zone", who are very fond of their own alleged "intelligence" and think that hot women should throw their panties at them every time they exhibit their all-encompassing wisdom. But would they ******* do the same for an very unattractive, but smart girl? NO!
Go on, hate. I don't care. I will try to fight stupid **** like this every time I see it, even though I'm probably vastly outnumbered
User avatar #34 - theshaman (11/03/2012) [+] (8 replies)
"Oh wow, your calculus skills are SOO hot!!" - no girl ever
#280 - Wingz (11/03/2012) [-]
I'm still waiting
User avatar #274 - theugandanhero (11/03/2012) [-]
SHE WANTS THE B
User avatar #269 - Mahazama (11/03/2012) [+] (13 replies)
If humans were attracted to intelligence, we'd have already claimed the galaxy by now. But no, women go for "swag" and dicksize, biceps. And guys go for tits and easy girls.
****** is wrong with us?
#231 - arijan (11/03/2012) [+] (1 reply)
This changes the song completely.
#19 - genexxxbloodwing (11/03/2012) [+] (1 reply)
Ohh, This Post is giving me such a Brainer
#110 - kuchikirukia (11/03/2012) [-]
Dat intelligence.
#262 - mattbrad (11/03/2012) [-]
Thats it. Come to daddy.
#95 - TheFixer (11/03/2012) [-]
related.
User avatar #213 - amoussa (11/03/2012) [+] (13 replies)
purpose of life is all about ensuring your genes survival and replication. Inherently, Women look for survival traits in a man (such as social proof, financial sercuity etc) whereas men look for replicative traits in a woman (most notably looks, i.e. hip to waist ratio that produces the healthiest offspring). My point is that looks, especially for a man is always going to be important at the end of the day and I really don't care about personality or intelligence as long as the girl's a nice person. As simple as that.

I'm not an arrogant cunt to disregard dumb women.
#309 - furiousmarshmellow (11/03/2012) [+] (7 replies)
Well, half of this site isn't getting laid then.
Well, half of this site isn't getting laid then.
#204 - Kekuchi (11/03/2012) [+] (8 replies)
I tried to look the word up in a dictionary, nothing really came up. Must be a new word or something.
The idea of being attracted to how intelligent someone is isn't that far-fetched, but being attracted to intelligence alone is not possible.
For example, you meet two ladies, both of which are easily 9/10 (now fj its ok to dream sometimes, coz meeting two girls 9/10 who are interested in us is about as close as Alpha Centauri is to our pokemon card collections)
Both girls are equally attractive but one is much more intelligent, if you find yourself being attracted to the intelligent one then I understand how the term sapiosexual behavior comes into play. You cant tell me, however, that if the intelligent girl was a 1/10 you would still hit that, it just doesn't compute.
#3 - jimboismynameo (11/02/2012) [-]
lets get it on
lets get it on
#294 - goodnewseveryone (11/03/2012) [+] (2 replies)
i'm mind ******* you right now
User avatar #11 - kamisamamema (11/02/2012) [+] (16 replies)
I'm a girl and I'm really into maths and science my self and boys doing or knowing for example algebra and science is a huge turn on for me... Am I a sapiosexual?
User avatar #20 to #11 - guitarguise (11/03/2012) [-]
I dunno... you don't seem to have a very great grasp of good writing. Even though it's not entirely relevant to people who focus on math and science, usually scientists have good diction and structured sentences, if not at least rhetorical sentences.

Your statement was a pretty bad run-on, and you sound like an attention whore. "Oh, I'm smart! and smart boys make me horny! Does this make me a sapiosexual?" Clearly you are fishing for approval and attention. But who knows? I look forward to an intelligent response. I'd be gladly proven wrong :)
[ 334 comments ]
Leave a comment
 Friends (0)